Green Energy (Page 1/2)
Larryinkc FEB 24, 03:31 PM
I read this on another forum and thought it was interesting.

"The first law of thermodynamics, also known as Law of Conservation of Energy, states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; energy can only be transferred or changed from one form to another

The concept of "green energy" has always puzzled me and the assertion that essentially it just needs harvesting via solar panels, windmills, wave generators, etc. and has no effect on anything

The First Law of Thermodynamics might suggests that could be problematic

This "free energy" generally comes to us in one form or another, so if we gather this energy to do things humans see as important its no longer available to do whatever it was doing before


Discuss"
blackrams FEB 24, 04:02 PM

quote
Originally posted by Larryinkc:

The First Law of Thermodynamics might suggests that could be problematic

This "free energy" generally comes to us in one form or another, so if we gather this energy to do things humans see as important its no longer available to do whatever it was doing before


Discuss"



I have tried to tell my wife this many times but, she still finds things for me to do that require my energy.

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 02-24-2021).]

williegoat FEB 24, 04:04 PM
With the exception of geothermal and nuclear power, which have their origins in the formation of the planet, all other energy we use comes from the sun, including hydroelectric, oil and coal.

Hydroelectric dams alter the ecosystem up- and downstream. There is a lot written about the effects of Glen Canyon dam on the Grand Canyon, from sediment deposits to nutrients.

Solar panels block the sun from the ground, so plants will not grow. Plants turn in to coal or are eaten by animals which turn into oil.

Wind turbines kill birds. Birds are responsible for spreading seeds.

Nothing happens in a vacuum. I'm sure you have heard of the "butterfly effect".
MidEngineManiac FEB 24, 04:37 PM
Solar farms stop the sunlight from getting to the ground, preventing or impeding plant growth.
RWDPLZ FEB 24, 05:39 PM
It means you can't convert energy from one form to another without waste of some kind (typically this waste is heat through friction).

Think of these different ways to charge a battery:

Burning coal creates heat and pollution (sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, etc). Building a coal burning plant creates a small fraction of the pollution the plant then puts out over its lifetime.

Charging a solar panel creates heat, but no pollution. Pollution is only created when the panel is made, and thrown away after it's useful life (typically 20-30 years), and like building the coal plant, is a tiny fraction.

The main point of the law is no process is 100% efficient, and cannot be more than 100% efficient, which would make it a perpetual motion machine.



The sunlight absorbed by solar panels is going to be there even if the panel is not. You can then choose to harness that power or not, and maximize the investment by putting it in a location that absorbs the maximum amount of sunlight.

Coal has to be transported from the coal mine to the power plant, typically by rail, creating more pollution by diesel locomotives.

With most solar installations, the panels are absorbing the sunlight, preventing it from being absorbed by the roof of a house. At worst this means you don't get free heating of the roof by the sun to warm up a house more quickly on the floor directly beneath the roof, if the house is poorly insulated.
blackrams FEB 24, 09:24 PM
Got this in an email today, just had to share it.

Brad lived in California.....
He was sick of the world, of Covid-19, Trump, Russian belligerence, China, global warming, racial tensions, and the rest of the disturbing stories that occupy media headlines.

Brad drove his car into his garage and then sealed every doorway and window as best he could. He got back into his car and wound down all the windows, selected his favorite radio station, started the car and revved it to a slow idle.

Two days later, a worried neighbor peered through his garage window and saw him in the car.

She notified the emergency services and they broke in, pulling Brad from the car.

A little sip of water and, surprisingly, he was in perfect condition, but his Tesla had a dead battery.

Brad is a registered California Democrat.

Had me rolling on the floor laughing...


Not that I think all California Dems are like that.

Rams
cliffw FEB 24, 09:46 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
Got this in an email today, just had to share it.



Warning blackrams, about email. If you see one that says "picture of Nancy Pelosi enclosed" do not open it. It's a picture of Nancy Pelosi.
blackrams FEB 24, 10:01 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Warning blackrams, about email. If you see one that says "picture of Nancy Pelosi enclosed" do not open it. It's a picture of Nancy Pelosi.



No worries about that Cliffw. I consider myself forewarned. But, I'm curious, just how do you know this?

Rams
RWDPLZ FEB 24, 10:55 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
...revved it to a slow idle...Tesla



wut.
williegoat FEB 24, 10:58 PM

quote
Originally posted by RWDPLZ:

wut.


If he can take I-20 to Phoenix, he can idle his Tesla.