

 |
| Biden to cancel Keystone XL pipeline permit (Page 8/13) |
|
maryjane
|
JAN 20, 06:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
I really doubt Canada is going to change Biden's mind, their oil isn't really needed at this time. Though, I do firmly support their efforts, I'd rather us use their oil so we don't have to our oil.. I don't believe the price difference is significant. Feel free to correct me if I am incorrect on that.
Rams |
|
You are, partly wrong. Unlike babies, not all oil is created equal. Even tho we as a nation are a net exporter of crude oil and refined crude products, it isn't true for all states. People think oil is cheap to ship/transport. It isn't. It IS,complicated. Pipelines are generally owned by pipeline companies with sometimes a refining company owning a share of it, but federal law requires the ownership to allow any refinery or midstream company access to the lines as long as there is capacity available and the user pays the tolls. Cost/bbl/mile and, it is also dependent on the spot price (value of the product) and the type crude or finished product being pumped thru the line. For the Canada side of the Keystone, the cost is calculated on cu litre and not the standard 42 gal bbl. It's cost also depends where the oil is going (it's destination) Looking at the tolls on Dec 31 2020, heavy crude pumped from Hardisty, Alberta to the U.S. border near Haskett Manitoba, with deliver to Houston Texas it cost the destination $16.53/cu ltr. On the same day, heavy crude from the same source going to Cushing Ok cost $19.38. Crude going to Wood River/Patoka Ill cost $17.50/cu ltr the same date. Why was it cheaper to ship all the way to Houston--because they have what is known as a 20 yr committed contract for certain oil coming thru the Keystone. Cushing and Patoka have comitted contracts for some products, and are uncomitted for others. In the above case, they were getting oil not comitted to their contract.
It's complicated.. Only the Gulf Coast states and NM are really energy independent, with most of the other states dependent on gulf coast oil or foreign oil. That mostly means Canada and Mexico currently. Why? Gravity, terrain, distance. It is extremely difficult (and costly) to pump crude oil from the Gulf Coast over the Rockies, Appalacians and Smokey Mountains and of course, the distance is a big factor as well. Even without the mountains, LA Calif, Patoka Illinois, Cushing Ok, Hardisty Alberta are all higher above sea level than Houston Tx by hundreds of feet. (Hardisty Alberta is nearly 2000' higher in elevation than Houston)
 Almost all the crude we import from Canada ends up at Gulf Coast refineries and it is predominantly heavy high sulfur crude oil. High sulfur oil is often called sour oil as opposed to light sweet crude that is found on 'some' of the gulf coast and the West Texas Permian Basin. West Texas Intermediate is one of the 3 benchmark crude oils traded on the world market. (The Gulf Coast DOES produce a lot of heavy sour crude. The other 2 benchmarks are Brent (NorthSea) and Dubai.) The benchmark designations have more to do with availability and destination than specific gravity or sulfur content. Within those benchmarks are various other & more definitive designations for different types of crude. Another aspect is TAN.. total acid number. Much of the oil produced today has a higher TAN and it is more corrosive to pipelines and processing equipment.
it's complicated.. The crude being transported thru Keystone from Canada is called WCS. Western Canadian Select. Tar sands crude are thick and are bituminous and will NOT flow well as produced. It's either strip mined of forced to flow by high pressure steam which heats it up and makes it less viscous. To be transported very far, they have to be diluted with something thinner in order for the product to be pumped. There is a product at the wellhead of many conventional oil wells called condensate. We used to call it 'drip gas'. Thin, highly flamable and it could be burned right from the wellhead in farm equipment and early automobiles. This is often used to dilute the btumen 'oil' but there isn't enough of it so they use synthetic oil to thin it with. The product that comes across in the Keystone from the oil sands is actually known as Dilbit. Diluted Bitumen. This, will usually get blended with non Dilbit at the destination. Almost all Gulf Coast refiners can and do process heavy high sulfur crude, while refiners on the East coasts and in the heartland usually do not. California refiners like Phillips66 can and do processheavy high sulfur crude and Calif, uses a combination of regional produced oil but previpously imported a lot of South American and Mexican crude via tanker ship.
Heavy sour crude historically came at a discount. It was cheaper, but. (again, it's complicated) with the ban on Venezuela and Iranian oil, heavy sour crude has become harder to get.. and thus, more expensive. The spread between light sweet and heavy sour has narrowed enough that some refiners that had planned to add cokers (they remove sulfur) to existing or new units have cancelled those plans. What effect the permit loss for KeystoneXL will have is yet unknown, but I suspect if the spread between domestic light sweet and imported heavy sour again increases, we will see increases at the retail level.[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 01-20-2021).]
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 20, 08:06 AM
|
|
Biden has only one opinion on every subject and that is, Whatever "they" tell me is politically expedient is what I think. The man has no character and no beliefs.
|
|
|
maryjane
|
JAN 20, 08:59 AM
|
|
Google is watching....

up yours greenies
How dare me!!![This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 01-20-2021).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 20, 09:09 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
I suspect if the spread between domestic light sweet and imported heavy sour again increases, we will see increases at the retail level.
|
|
Some of what you just posted I was aware of but I learned quite a bit reading it. The end result we are agreed on but, not simply due to the canceling of the pipeline but due to the Harris/Biden goals.
Rams
|
|
|
Patrick
|
JAN 20, 01:53 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
Gravity... Hardisty Alberta is nearly 2000' higher in elevation than Houston
|
|
Interesting. Have to admit that I hadn't considered the gravity of the situation. 
Seems to me that politics aside, it would benefit both Canadian and American interests for the Keystone XL pipeline to continue.
Full disclosure... I'd prefer that Alberta crude not be shipped out through the Port of Vancouver to wherever. I'd hate to see a Exxon Valdez type disaster occur locally.
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 20, 02:11 PM
|
|
|
Do they pump across the Smoky Mountains/Appalachians or go up the valleys and around the mountains with taps for destinations to the higher elevations, then truck it to little communities?
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 20, 02:25 PM
|
|
OK, what's a Skyrider? Looks like some kind of Drone.
Says it's free............... No Thanks, I've learned from experience, nothing is really free.
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 01-20-2021).]
|
|
|
Old Lar
|
JAN 20, 03:01 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
I looked into Solar when constructing my new home. Very expensive with a life span of less than twenty years as I remember. The south side of my home would have been loaded up with solar panels. Just wasn't feasible with the expense and ROI. This also makes the price of home ownership much more costly. I don't know about you but, my home is the biggest investment of my life. I don't need to add cost to something with such a low ROI. What about all those folks that live in large apartment buildings, are home owners expected to carry the entire cost for them to have cheap energy? There will have to be significant improvements to make those systems more efficient and last longer before they will ever be on every home. Not all of us live in the Sun Shine State so, Solar doesn't make sense in a lot of places.
Rams |
|
I had installed solar on my house in 2018. My electric bill has dropped considerably. The solar panels (21 in total) are on the east, south and west side of my house. ROI is maybe break even as the panels cost $23K . My complaint is that I receive a daily or two calls per day wanting me to "invest" in solar for my house "at no cost". Scam calls. Living in Florida it sort of makes sense as we do get lots of sun. The solar power generated gets fed back into Florida Power and Light's grid.
Some think the panels are ugly, but the only ones you can see are a few on the front of my house. My highest electric bill was $43 (it was really hot in October) with $6.80 in taxes. My usual bill runs from $9.60- $16.00 including taxes. Prior to the solar my electric bill ran from $110-300/ month. (again October always seemed to be the highest bill).
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 20, 03:24 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Old Lar:
I had installed solar on my house in 2018. My electric bill has dropped considerably. The solar panels (21 in total) are on the east, south and west side of my house. ROI is maybe break even as the panels cost $23K . My complaint is that I receive a daily or two calls per day wanting me to "invest" in solar for my house "at no cost". Scam calls. Living in Florida it sort of makes sense as we do get lots of sun. The solar power generated gets fed back into Florida Power and Light's grid.
Some think the panels are ugly, but the only ones you can see are a few on the front of my house. My highest electric bill was $43 (it was really hot in October) with $6.80 in taxes. My usual bill runs from $9.60- $16.00 including taxes. Prior to the solar my electric bill ran from $110-300/ month. (again October always seemed to be the highest bill). |
|
Good, I'm glad it's working out for you.
My original estimate for Solar Panel installation, everything needed was just over $32,000 as I remember. Adding them would have meant we didn't get something else we wanted. Just couldn't justify it myself but, that's me.
Rams
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 20, 03:56 PM
|
|
If you're looking for energy independence or lowering dependence or even supplementing for times of outages then that has a value aside from lowering bills on a grid tied system.
Not sure a grid tied system is that attractive to me. But then again you pay a minimum monthly electric charge already.
Looking at Colonial Pipeline's supply system they don't traverse mountain ranges from Houston to NYC.
|
|

 |
|