 
     |
| Banning of Conservatives on Social Media (Page 7/13) |
|
2.5
|
JAN 13, 02:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
The govt, thru their constitutional mandate to provide for the general welfare and common defense of it's citizens would have to assume almost all are legit until proven otherwise via investigation. The investigation would take various forms but govt has to assume a role in that process if they are to find out which are "rooted in reality" and which are 'total nonsense'. |
|
Do you believe that was done with all the election fraud claims?
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
JAN 13, 05:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
JAN 13, 07:20 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 2.5:
Do you believe that was done with all the election fraud claims? |
|
I've seen nothing but rhetoric and hyperbole to prove otherwise, but do note I said "almost all".
Some the 'claims of election fraud" I read about were so far out in the middle of the weeds I doubt even the most ardent monitor would give them any credence 'from the git go'. That includes the Falun Gong claims.
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JAN 13, 07:31 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
I've seen nothing but rhetoric and hyperbole to prove otherwise, but do note I said "almost all".
Some the 'claims of election fraud" I read about were so far out in the middle of the weeds I doubt even the most ardent monitor would give them any credence 'from the git go'. That includes the Falun Gong claims. |
|
I don't know why or how you keep saying this. There have been dozens of arrests, they're just not really making the news because it goes against the narrative the media is trying to portray. One of them was a Republican, even one of them was outed by Project Veritas. The only thing that's fact is that the courts have been throwing out the cases without even seeing the evidence... it's not about law, it's about risk mitigation. No one wanted to be responsible for potentially overturning an election. Hopefully they'll take it a bit more seriously after inauguration.
|
|
|
|
hammer
|
JAN 13, 08:02 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
I've seen nothing but rhetoric and hyperbole to prove otherwise, but do note I said "almost all".
Some the 'claims of election fraud" I read about were so far out in the middle of the weeds I doubt even the most ardent monitor would give them any credence 'from the git go'. That includes the Falun Gong claims. |
|
Well I'm from the state where over 6000 votes were switched to Biden from Trump in one rural county, so I don't necessarlly share that sentiment...
|
|
|
cliffw
|
JAN 13, 08:26 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
The only thing that's fact is that the courts have been throwing out the cases without even seeing the evidence...
|
|
The DBub has said on this forum that it has been demonstrably been proven false. Google it.
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 13, 08:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
JAN 13, 08:57 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by hammer:
Well I'm from the state where over 6000 votes were switched to Biden from Trump in one rural county, so I don't necessarlly share that sentiment... |
|
It's this kind of thing I keep hearing about, but nothing meat and potatoes to go along with it ever seems to surface..
'Who' switched them? (names please and official title if it's known)
How and/or when did you learn of 'the switch' and from whom?
"How" was it done? Details would be great.
"When" was the switch actually done?
How many people knew about 'the switch" as it was being done?
"Who" (names/titles) ordered or authorized 'the switch'?
Was it corrected once "the switch" was detected?
How did the 'switcher' plead when charged with whatever state or county crime was applicable?[This message has been edited by maryjane (edited 01-13-2021).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 13, 09:18 PM
|
|
Hillary will never be charged, so that's how things are done sometimes. She committed a felony even if it was negligence according to the code. But removing classified info and walking it to her private unsecured server offsite wasnt allowed. Letting friends and Weiner's possession of it isn't allowed either.
Everyone knows she absolutely did it but the FBI won't prosecute.
|
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JAN 13, 11:39 PM
|
|
Somebody mentioned that they are putting "conservatives" in a digital ghetto. That's a good analogy.
|
|
|
