 
     |
| Is Social Justice a disease? (Page 6/21) |
|
sourmash
|
JAN 08, 10:21 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
No you don't and no it isn't.
IF you were ever sufficiently "high up in Corporate America" (sic) YOU wouldn't be so absorbed in silly, ancillary, nonsense that ISN'T the goal or "extremely relevant" to "corporate America" or anyone in senior management, control or ownership.
What YOU claim to be "extremely relevant" is mostly assigned to lower level functionaries and HR managers (that purposefully is a position now inhabited by young SJW's that are hired to fill their role of keeping equal opportunity lawsuits away from the corporation while actual business is conducted by the productive people of the company.)
I suspect that you really have no clue what is actually "extremely relevant" to corporate America.
By the way your capitalizing "Corporate America" (sic) is both unimpressive, unconvincing, and indicative of someone who isn't as "relatively high up" as he thinks he is or is attempting to convince others he is.
|
|
Randye, damn. You're brutal, man lol. You're not wrong, though. The positions are on the deficit side of the ledger, but it's been made mandatory in corporate America.
|
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 09, 12:36 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
No you don't and no it isn't.
IF you were ever sufficiently "high up in Corporate America" (sic) YOU wouldn't be so absorbed in silly, ancillary, nonsense that ISN'T the goal or "extremely relevant" to "corporate America" or anyone in senior management, control or ownership.
What YOU claim to be "extremely relevant" is mostly assigned to lower level functionaries and HR managers (that, purposefully, is a position now inhabited by young SJW's that are hired to fill their role of keeping equal opportunity nuisance lawsuits away from the corporation while actual business is conducted by the productive people of the company.)
I suspect that you really have no clue what is actually "extremely relevant" to corporate America.
By the way your capitalizing "Corporate America" (sic) is both unimpressive, unconvincing, and indicative of someone who isn't as "relatively high up" as he thinks he is or is attempting to convince others he is.
|
|
It doesn’t really matter what you think of my job. My intent was only to show why I’m invested. You can believe what you will, otherwise.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 09, 02:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
It doesn’t really matter what you think of my job. My intent was only to show why I’m invested. You can believe what you will, otherwise.
|
|
It's pretty obvious that young SJWs unhappiness and perennial discontent with life is a direct result of their compulsive bad investments and bad judgment.
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 09, 09:02 AM
|
|
Hey someone has to do the job, right?
Plus it's lucrative for the skill level required. Gets a person paid for mining trigger words, insensitivities, offenses from the English language or behavior.
Wonder what sort of formal college achievement is required? Of course one must be a POC or qualifying homosexual, transexual, bisexual if not a POC.
Director of Snowflake Awareness and Training[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 01-09-2021).]
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
JAN 09, 09:09 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
Hey someone has to do the job, right?
Plus it's lucrative for the skill level required. Gets a person paid for mining trigger words, insensitivities, offenses from the English language or behavior.
Wonder what sort of formal college achievement is required? Of course one must be a POC or qualifying homosexual, transexual, bisexual if not a POC.
Director of Snowflake Awareness and Training
|
|
Totally false.
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 09, 09:37 AM
|
|
|
Mostly true, but done in haste. Of course hetero women are approved for the positions too.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 09, 07:43 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
Hey someone has to do the job, right?
Plus it's lucrative for the skill level required. Gets a person paid for mining trigger words, insensitivities, offenses from the English language or behavior.
Wonder what sort of formal college achievement is required? Of course one must be a POC or qualifying homosexual, transexual, bisexual if not a POC.
Director of Snowflake Awareness and Training
|
|
Speaking as someone who has interviewed and approved the hiring of multiple HR managers over the course of my career, I can assure you that I didn't inquire about their sexual preferences and I don't know of anyone else who did.
I never asked about their politics or racial ideas either.
That said, one HR manager I approved for hire later turned out to have an odd inability to find any qualified candidates for positions in the company other than young Puerto Rican females, which she "coincidentally" was herself, (as well as her being possessed of the habit of loudly expressing her Leftist politics and personal racial grievances.)
That in itself wouldn't have been an insurmountable problem IF the candidates she found later turned out to be qualified, productive and fit well into the company, however a few turned out to have falsified resumes, which should have been very easily screened out by the HR manager, and most of the rest that were hired proved to be spectacularly incapable at their jobs or were abrasive with coworkers, angry, confrontational and such a disruption within the company that we had to let them go before their 90 day probationary hiring was completed.
The young HR manager soon followed them into unemployment.
Of course she immediately filed a "discrimination" lawsuit which she also lost by summary judgment.
If allowed to take root, "social justice" activism within a company is like a cancer. It will gradually disable the company from proper functioning and will eventually kill it.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-09-2021).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 09, 08:54 PM
|
|
|
My last employer outsourced to a contractor to come in and teach us how not to offend anyone, because look what happened to Starbucks when they asked the 2 Black men to leave for not buying anything.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 09, 11:43 PM
|
|
The bottom line is:
"Social justice" is the politics of covetousness and the creed of sloth.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-09-2021).]
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JAN 10, 11:12 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
Is it a disease...? No...
Social justice is interesting. It's often that there is no right decision, just one that is more correct than another. Take the following statements and possible actions as an example:
White men make up more of senior leadership at F500 companies than their "share" of the population. That's not necessarily an issue on its own, just a fact. |
|
White people made up a SIGNIFICANT majority of citizens in this country from Revolutionary times to present time. Obviously the native Americans lived here first, but they did not exist in the same numbers as those that came here. They fought constantly amongst themselves and killed themselves off. We have a pristine idea of Native American Indians as being one with Earth, but largely they were warring tribes that barbarically killed eachother. Super-awesome culture, but never the less, they did not exist in enormous numbers like the Colonists did. From the founding of the United States, to even just ~30 years ago, whites made up almost 80% of the population in the United States.
Fortune 500 is a list of 500 American companies. Since at the time most of these CEOs were born, white people dominated the population, it would only make sense that the overwhelming vast majority of these would be run by white people.
Incidentally, we've had massive immigration from all over the world in the span of the last 30 years, and the United States is now more diverse than it's ever been in 30 years, I expect the Fortune 500 companies to be reflective of the population break-out as it exists *TODAY*, not 30 years from now.
Incidentally, white people are a minority in overall world population. The top 10 wealthiest people, 8 of them are white, and 7 of them are American. This is because the United States is also the wealthiest nation in the world... for a variety of reasons:
1 - We didn't get our country completely destroyed during WW2 since the battle was fought in Europe and in Asia
2 - We have (had?) the most successful free-market system in the world which coupled with #1, allowed us to quickly become the dominant economy in the world
Both of these led to where we are with Fortune 500 companies.
|
|
|
|