

 |
| Russian Collusion! (Page 6/11) |
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 22, 02:37 PM
|
|
This, for that.

You know what I like about the Mueller investigation? It's full of surprises. Like that Dutch lawyer, Alex Van Der Zwaan, that just plead guilty. From the venerated New York City law firm of Skadden Arps. Who saw that one coming? "Life is like a box of chocolates..."[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-22-2018).]
|
|
|
cliffw
|
FEB 22, 03:13 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by : ... based on the reporting that I find most credible.
|
|
"Houston, we have a problem".
rinselberg, you need better news intelligence.
Let me type slow. I am going to interrogate you. Come out of the closet.
Which reporting, from whom, do you find the most credible ?
One more question, for now.
Are you credible news sources trying to get comments from Andy McCabe, Lisa Page and what's his name, Strock ?
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 22, 04:10 PM
|
|
I am aware of the inappropriate text messaging that went on between the two FBI agents, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
What I have not seen is any idea or theory about how either of these two FBI agents could have diverted any of the DOJ's larger investigations away from its proper course. Such as the Mueller investigation. Or before that, the Hillary Clinton EMAILS investigation. Did either of these two FBI "lovebirds" tamper with any evidence or submit any purposely falsified reports?
My idea about these major DOJ investigations is that they are highly collaborative efforts. I don't think that any one individual, like Peter Strzok, could divert one of these investigations from its proper course, unless he were part of a larger conspiracy. I would expect that when Special Counsel Mueller terminated Strzok's role in the investigation, that Mueller also considered whether it was necessary to have some kind of internal review, to further scrutinize anything of import inside the investigation that had Strzok's "fingerprints" on it.
Ultimately, I think, the credibility of any of these high profile DOJ investigations depends upon the credibility of the people who are at the top. The leadership.
There are Congressional committees that are charged with the oversight of the DOJ. If they are not yet satisfied with the way that Mueller handled the Peter Strzok situation, they should keep pressing on that issue.
I am on the lookout for anything that may become public about a report that is being prepared by the DOJ's Inspector General, that will review the handling of the Hillary Clinton EMAILS investigation. I am on the lookout for anything that comes out of this report about Andrew McCabe.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-22-2018).]
|
|
|
dratts
|
FEB 22, 04:51 PM
|
|
|
More news on the Mueller investigation. More indictments. This thing is far from over. It's looking more and more like Watergate. Fascinating. I have no clue where this will end up but it's like a soap opera.
|
|
|
cliffw
|
FEB 22, 08:43 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
I am aware of the ...
What I have not seen is ...
... unless he were part of a larger conspiracy.
...that had Strzok's "fingerprints" on it.
I think, ...
I am on the lookout ...
|
|
My my. Perhaps you should open your eyes mind. Perhaps you should ask yourself some questions about what you are being spoon fed from your news intelligence.
Do you want me to help you ?
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 22, 09:13 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
This, for that.

You know what I like about the Mueller investigation? It's full of surprises. Like that Dutch lawyer, Alex Van Der Zwaan, that just plead guilty. From the venerated New York City law firm of Skadden Arps. Who saw that one coming? "Life is like a box of chocolates..."
|
|
Oh, you mean that guy who lied to the investigators, then deleted the emails that they requested? Or, was that Hillary?......No, couldn't be Hillary because she was (one of the cool kids, a democrat, friends with the boss) never charged.
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 23, 12:29 AM
|
|
So, according to what seems to be the general consensus of this forum, Hillary got away with something. Or more than just something. Got away with a lot. Got off "scot free."
Would it now be in the best interests of this country to use that as a Get Out Of Jail Free Card (so to speak) for OTHER people and OTHER groups? Such as the friends and associates of one Donald J. Trump, originally from New York City, New York?
If Trump gets a "mulligan" on that basis--because of actions that were not taken against Hillary Clinton--what's the next destination on that road?
How about "Anarchy, USA"..?
President Trump has not been formally accused of any wrongdoing by the Mueller team. Not President Trump. Not Ivanka Trump. Not Jared Kushner. Not Donald Trump Jr or Eric Trump. Not even Barron Trump. Until any of that happens, it has not happened.
Are people here "bummed" about what has befallen former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates, or former National Security Advisor Mike "24 Days" Flynn? Do people here think that these Trump associates have been "railroaded" by the Mueller probe? It is just those three men that have been hit hard by the Mueller team, as it stands right now.
I suggest keeping an eye out for an Inspector General's report, prepared by the currently serving Inspector General for the Department of Justice, that will review what went on during the FBI's investigation of the Hillary Clinton EMAILS and (I expect) other Hillary Clinton-related topics, like the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One.
I think it will be released before summer in the Northern Hemisphere is fully underway.
In the interim, the Muller investigation will continue to make the world safe for democracy, one lyin' Dutch lawyer at a time.
You wouldn't want to be walking around Times Square late at night and be accosted by a lyin' Dutch lawyer, would you?[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-23-2018).]
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 23, 02:18 AM
|
|
When I was but a wee tyke, every children's magazine had a game with sequentially numbered dots placed in seemingly random positions about the page. The object was to draw a line from dot number one, to dot number two, then three and so forth; eventually revealing the image of a bunny rabbit, choo-choo train or other familiar object. When you played that game, I'll bet you always ended up with an ant farm or ball of yarn, didn't you?
 [This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 02-23-2018).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 23, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
Congress needs to press the Trump administration to enact stronger anti-Russian sanctions against the network that is responsible for the manufacture and export of Collushnikov rifles.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 23, 11:57 PM
|
|
If you are referring to the AK-47, it is spelled Kalashnikov, and Russia quit making them decades ago. They sold or gave the manufacturing rights to China, who manufactured them, calling the weapon the SKS. They are very simple and dependable weapons, inexpensive to manufacture and accurate.
Why do you make the statement that the Administration needs to take action?
|
|

 |
|