 
     |
| The evidence against anthropogenic global warming (Page 576/600) |
|
E.Furgal
|
AUG 24, 01:32 AM
|
|
yesterday.. the record for the hottest day recorded in the boston area was in 1880 ..
not 1980 not 2010 not 2015 1880
must suck when your own record keeping debunks, the fraud that is global "pick a new buzz word every few years" warming.
most use the polar ice caps as "proof" of man made global warming..
but when asked what caused the rest of the ice from the ice age to melt, it's well, um, you see, well that's different, um, well, oh, go away..
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
AUG 24, 09:16 AM
|
|
small minds note local events
pull your head out of your xxx
and note the world wide events------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?
|
|
|
|
Tony Kania
|
AUG 24, 09:41 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
small minds note local events
pull your head out of your xxx
and note the world wide events
|
|
History actually backs up his words on a world wide scale. Not just Boston. But you should already know that.
Small minds note short time periods. 
|
|
|
|
newf
|
AUG 24, 09:47 AM
|
|
|
|
|
jmclemore
|
AUG 24, 01:12 PM
|
|
2015 is the hottest year on record?
Under the Obama Administration?
While a Democrat is in Office?
After all of the restriction imposed by the government?
Despite All fines issued by the EPA?
At what point do we have enough evidence that anthropogenic intervention is not effective under the current model and that may perhaps suggest that our understanding of global climate change is a Mis-Understanding.
| quote | | Climate change feedback is important in the understanding of global warming because feedback processes may amplify or diminish the effect of each climate forcing, and so play an important part in determining the climate sensitivity and future climate state. Feedback in general is the process in which changing one quantity changes a second quantity, and the change in the second quantity in turn changes the first. Positive feedback amplifies the change in the first quantity while negative feedback reduces it. |
|
Catch22:
environment protection policies are VITAL to address global climate change and yet 2015 was the hottest year on record. Either 1 of those are factually incorrect or we are trying to treat the symptoms not the disease. The logic as I see it is this. If we are concerned about rising temperatures, we should be seeing a cosistant increase in temperatures annually even if it is a fraction of a degree. Not just a few spikes, here and there, that are quickly erased by the previous or following year.
|
|
|
|
newf
|
AUG 24, 02:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jmclemore:
2015 is the hottest year on record?
Under the Obama Administration?
While a Democrat is in Office?
After all of the restriction imposed by the government?
Despite All fines issued by the EPA?
|
|
This is a common mistake by many but America does not = the Earth.
| quote | Originally posted by jmclemore:
At what point do we have enough evidence that anthropogenic intervention is not effective under the current model and that may perhaps suggest that our understanding of global climate change is a Mis-Understanding.
|
|
Intervention is not effective, I agree most scientists are warning that we are not doing near enough.
| quote | Originally posted by jmclemore:
Catch22:
environment protection policies are VITAL to address global climate change and yet 2015 was the hottest year on record. Either 1 of those are factually incorrect or we are trying to treat the symptoms not the disease. The logic as I see it is this. If we are concerned about rising temperatures, we should be seeing a cosistant increase in temperatures annually even if it is a fraction of a degree. Not just a few spikes, here and there, that are quickly erased by the previous or following year.
|
|
As you said that logic as YOU see it, however the science is pretty consistent. Expecting a consistent yearly increase in something like Climate is like expecting someone's cancer to grow consistently with every cigarette they smoke.[This message has been edited by newf (edited 08-24-2016).]
|
|
|
|
jmclemore
|
AUG 24, 02:33 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by newf:
As you said that logic as YOU see it, however the science is pretty consistent. Expecting a consistent yearly increase in something like Climate is like expecting someone's cancer to grow consistently with every cigarette they smoke.
|
|
Granted, but if we aren't doing enough and climate change still moves forward, is there any way to measure our effect at slowing it's progress?
Likewise, if we are not doing nearly enough now, what would nearly enough be and can we afford it?
If we are not slowing this puppy down, we need to redirect resource and consider a different approach. And if we can not afford to do nearly enough, we must begin preparing for migration.....
|
|
|
|
newf
|
AUG 24, 03:00 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jmclemore:
Granted, but if we aren't doing enough and climate change still moves forward, is there any way to measure our effect at slowing it's progress?
Likewise, if we are not doing nearly enough now, what would nearly enough be and can we afford it?
If we are not slowing this puppy down, we need to redirect resource and consider a different approach. And if we can not afford to do nearly enough, we must begin preparing for migration..... |
|
Yes I agree once one accepts that it is happening there is a debate to be had on what to do.
|
|
|
|
avengador1
|
AUG 25, 10:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
avengador1
|
AUG 27, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|