 
     |
| The first 2020 'official' election prediction thread..... (Page 45/76) |
|
williegoat
|
DEC 07, 12:25 PM
|
|
From your linked article:
| quote | | They left with eight hard drives, three computers and a bag of USB sticks. The resident of the property, a 56-year-old IT expert named Elliot Kerwin, was served the warrant. He is not yet facing charges and was unreachable for comment at the time of publication. There is no indication that anything other than voters’ information, which can be acquired for a few hundred dollars in Arizona counties, was taken from the affected office. |
|
So, no one is being charged for stealing data that is available to anyone for a small fee. Yes, I read several articles and none really say much other than that the FBI took his stuff.
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
DEC 08, 09:34 PM
|
|
Straight from the Global Times (CCP mouth piece):
Biden government will likely keep Aussies and allies from wild actions
The current cartoon spat between Australia and China is taking a new turn. After Australian government reacted strongly to the tweet of a computer-generated image of an Australian soldier holding a knife to the throat of an Afghan boy, its friends, including the UK, France and New Zealand, came out to express support to Australia.
The incoming Joe Biden team, however, has taken a different approach. Jake Sullivan, appointed national security adviser for the Biden team, posted an even handed if veiled tweet on Thursday. It recognized that Australians, "have made great sacrifices to protect freedom and democracy around the world," and that the US will, "stand shoulder to shoulder with our ally Australia and rally fellow democracies to advance our shared security, prosperity, and values." Apart from him, no other senior official from the Biden camp has made any response to this case. However, we can never exclude the possibility that the Biden camp might show more support to Canberra, a long-term and steadfast ally of Washington, in the near future.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1209144.shtml
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
DEC 08, 09:50 PM
|
|
It appears that SCOTUS has declined to get involved in the election fracas.
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice
Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Coming any moment:
The fix is in and the US Supreme Court has joined the vast left wing/deep state conspiracy to deny Trump of his rightful landslide victory..
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
DEC 08, 10:14 PM
|
|
Don't forget Texas has filed suit directly with SCOTUS charging 4 other states with election fraud.
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors. The lawsuit says:
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.
…
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Texas approached the Supreme Court directly because Article III provides that it is the court of first impression on subjects where it has original jurisdiction, such as disputes between two or more states.
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
DEC 08, 11:08 PM
|
|
I've 'kinda' kept up with that 'Texas sues' to SCOTUS' thing, but Bill Paxton is apt to sue anyone at any given time for anything.
We'll have to see how it goes.
|
|
|
Boondawg
|
DEC 08, 11:18 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
I've 'kinda' kept up with that 'Texas sues' to SCOTUS' thing, but Bill Paxton is apt to sue anyone at any given time for anything.
We'll have to see how it goes. |
|
I got my eye there, too.
You might not believe it by looking at my text, but Texas is mecca to a idealistic "country-boy" like myself! 
|
|
|
|
RandomTask
|
DEC 09, 12:44 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
It appears that SCOTUS has declined to get involved in the election fracas.
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice
Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Coming any moment:
The fix is in and the US Supreme Court has joined the vast left wing/deep state conspiracy to deny Trump of his rightful landslide victory.. |
|
...or Trump actually lost?
|
|
|
Boondawg
|
DEC 09, 01:26 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by RandomTask:
...or Trump actually lost? |
|
That's what i'm hearing...but i gotta' tell ya', i've heard quite a bit of sh!t before.
See, here's the thing...
|
|
|
|
randye
|
DEC 09, 05:02 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
It appears that SCOTUS has declined to get involved in the election fracas.
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice
Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Coming any moment:
The fix is in and the US Supreme Court has joined the vast left wing/deep state conspiracy to deny Trump of his rightful landslide victory.. |
|
The Supreme Court ONLY denied the emergency injunctive relief sought by the Plaintiff as part of the case filed.
They did not to my knowledge dismiss the case itself as it is certed and docketed by the court.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 12-10-2020).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
DEC 09, 06:31 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
It appears that SCOTUS has declined to get involved in the election fracas.
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice
Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Coming any moment:
The fix is in and the US Supreme Court has joined the vast left wing/deep state conspiracy to deny Trump of his rightful landslide victory.. |
|
No, this was Mike Kelly challenging the rules changes. They said he waited too long.
|
|
|
|