"There are too many people" vs "A population collapse is coming" (Page 4/4)
Patrick MAR 04, 11:46 PM

quote
Originally posted by Hudini:

You are mostly correct but not because of any nanobots in the vaccine.



But... but... someone else here said it was true!

ray b MAR 05, 12:34 AM
there are no nanobots anywhere

it is a SI-FI IDEA FROM A NOVEL CALLED The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer
is a science fiction novel by American writer Neal Stephenson.

Neal Stephenson IS A VERY GOOD WRITER
82-T/A [At Work] MAR 07, 09:03 AM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

there are no nanobots anywhere

it is a SI-FI IDEA FROM A NOVEL CALLED The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer
is a science fiction novel by American writer Neal Stephenson.

Neal Stephenson IS A VERY GOOD WRITER




There are nanobots! I don't know about in the vaccine! But it is technology that's currently being researched, already prototyped, that attacks cancer cells.

I'll see if I can find a video...





... there's another video I saw a couple of months ago... much better design and functionality, but this was the quickest / easiest one to find.


.
Ok, here's the technology I was looking for, actually a robot with a chip...

2.5 MAR 08, 12:01 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
There are nanobots! I don't know about in the vaccine! But it is technology that's currently being researched, already prototyped, that attacks cancer cells.




Yep

https://www.weforum.org/age...er-cells-60-seconds/

"They are now experimenting on micro-organisms and small fish, before moving on to rodents. Clinical trials in humans are expected to follow and it is hoped that the results may have the potential to save millions of lives.

These minute molecules have components that enable them to identify and attach themselves to a cancer cell.

When activated by light, the nanobots’ rota-like chain of atoms begin to spin at an incredible rate – around two to three million times per second. This causes the nanobot to drill into the cancer cell, blasting it open.

The study is still in its early stages, but researchers are optimistic it has the potential to lead to new types of cancer treatment.

The destructive properties of the nanobots make them perfect for killing cancer cells. But the technology can also be used to repair damaged or diseased tissues at a molecular level.

In the future, these nanomachines could essentially patrol the circulatory system of the human body. They could be used to detect specific chemicals or toxins and give early warnings of organ failure or tissue rejection.

Another potential function may involve taking biometric measurements to monitor a person’s general health.

The medicinal advantages of nanobots are clear to see, but industry might also benefit from the technology.

Oil and gas is one example. The idea is that nanobots could be injected into geologic formations thousands of feet into the earth. Changes to the chemical make-up of the machines would point to the location of reservoirs.

Meanwhile, it’s also been suggested that nanotechnology could become a valuable tool in cleaning up oil spills.

There is a long way to go before this tiny technology enters the mainstream, but it has the potential to make a massive impact on the world."
Jake_Dragon MAR 23, 11:46 AM
2.5 MAR 25, 10:56 AM
Elon Musk's opinion


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP5Z14X-moM


How many younger folk do you know who are getting married and having kids, creating families?
82-T/A [At Work] MAR 25, 08:34 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:

Elon Musk's opinion


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP5Z14X-moM


How many younger folk do you know who are getting married and having kids, creating families?




I actually have two friends that each had 4 kids, but that is super rare. They are both really intelligent, so that's good... but one of them is ultra liberal, and the other is super conservative.

All my other friends though, only have 1 or 2 children tops...
maryjane MAR 26, 12:23 PM
I come from parentage that had 5 children, (plus 1 stillborn in the late 40s)
As for myself.... I have 4 spawn. I have 11 grandchildren and one great grandchild.
2.5 APR 01, 10:02 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I actually have two friends that each had 4 kids, but that is super rare. They are both really intelligent, so that's good... but one of them is ultra liberal, and the other is super conservative.

All my other friends though, only have 1 or 2 children tops...



Arent you and your friends in your 40s or more though?
That is perhaps the trailing edge...

[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 04-01-2022).]