 
     |
| Strength, critical thinking from being called mean names. (Page 4/10) |
|
Patrick
|
FEB 12, 01:54 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
 | | CLICK FOR FULL SIZE |
|
|
Nor clever.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 12, 07:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
randye
|
FEB 13, 12:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
blackrams
|
FEB 13, 06:52 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
The approach of a leftist is to disrupt and behave badly by personally attacking people to try to drive them away if they can't convince them to give in to the moral and intellecrual intellectual corruption of leftist beliefs. |
|
Sorry, that's not a "leftist" tactic. That approach tactic is seen coming from those who claim to be on the other side of the aisle also. Oh, I also fixed the spelling error. Feel free to fix any I make. I do the same thing from time to time.
Rams
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
FEB 13, 07:50 AM
|
|
People with no intellectual or a false moral high ground snipe at others with pettiness, like name calling, grammar and spelling sneers. They have no defense so they try to deflect and ridicule. It falls under the same things I already outlined. If names don't work they try it from a diff angle.
I see the people who claim to be things that they aren't. I see the people who try to hide who they really are as a tactic to fool others into supporting them.
But who they really are comes out fairly easily. The support they find is only from others who have been exposed. Edit insertion: and occassionally from nastier lefties who arent trying to hide. And together they (the hiding lefties) drift left to their natural position, because they're angered at being exposed.[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 02-13-2022).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
FEB 13, 08:07 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
People with no intellectual or a false moral high ground snipe at others with pettiness, like name calling, grammar and spelling sneers. They have no defense so they try to deflect and ridicule. It falls under the same things I already outlined. If names don't work they try it from a diff angle.
I see the people who claim to be things that they aren't. I see the people who try to hide who they really are as a tactic to fool others into supporting them.
But who they really are comes out fairly easily. The support they find is only from others who have been exposed. Edit insertion: and occassionally from nastier lefties who arent trying to hide. And together they (the hiding lefties) drift left to their natural position, because they're angered at being exposed.
|
|
Gotcha, that made me smile, thanks I needed that.
Thanks for proving my point. 
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 02-13-2022).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
FEB 13, 08:17 AM
|
|
Your first response was too revealing, eh? It always is.
Your point is left of center. We both know that. Everybody sees the few who side and agree with you.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 13, 10:42 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
Sorry, that's [what sourmash was describing] not a "leftist" tactic. That approach tactic (or tactic) is seen coming from those who claim to be on the other side of the aisle also. Oh, I also fixed the spelling error. Feel free to fix any I make. I do the same thing from time to time. |
|
FTFY 
I couldn't agree more with blackrams on this.
To reference or describe the expressions and deeds of all kinds of groups and individuals, that are seen in just about any context or circumstance, and say that's a characteristic or hallmark of the "Left", is a canard. It's absurd. That's what sourmash has done here. He's "canard'ing."
And there's another forum member at the table (so to speak) who seldom says anything on this forum that doesn't include some version of this same ridiculous canard. It would be dead accurate to say, of that particular forum member, that's his "calling ca(na)rd." His endless baloney about the "Left".
See what I just did there?
 [This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-13-2022).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
FEB 13, 11:11 AM
|
|
Gee, who's that agreeing with blackrams?
The right doesn't pretend to have leftist moral superiority like the leftist pretends to be a right winger (in most all cases). The true right ridicules the ideology by logic, and will ridicule the person for trying to smear a poop covering to look like chocolate cake icing.
For those who think logically, it's obvious that there is no cake being presented. We see the poop. The leftist is personally offended that a hatedul person wouldn't pretend that it could be cake since it's cake shaped and being called 'cake'.
Rules for Radicals is the leftist hand book. What I detailed comes from the leftist guide book on the politics of personal attack. How to defeat the opposition without having to present a winning opinion.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 13, 11:49 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
Gee, who's that agreeing with blackrams? . . . |
|
You're giving that other forum member (the one that I just singled out, without using his screen name) some top notch competition in the race for Olympic gold, in the Boredom Inducing event.
I went looking for my "file photo" of a man yawning. It's a "gif". I couldn't find it. I'm sure it's there. I often find that when I review the images that I've saved on imgur(.com) it's hard to spot the image that I want to retrieve. Of course, I have quite a number of them.
You're drowning in abstractions; in an empty word salad of your own making.
Did you just describe blackrams (a few messages back) as "left of center"..? Where you said his "point" was "left of center"..?
The only way that blackrams is "left of center" (in a political or cultural context) is if the Multiverse speculations of certain cosmologists are reality, and there's some other universe with some other "blackrams" on some other online messaging board.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-13-2022).]
|
|
|
|
