"Is this a simulation" (Page 4/8)
sourmash NOV 14, 05:25 PM
Lol. That's funny.

But.....I'm not the one inventing things not said. That would be crazy.
Gee, everybody saw you calling me sourboy.


[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 11-14-2021).]

Rickady88GT NOV 14, 05:58 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Rinse disappeared when asked to re-engage on an honest foot. He chose not to admit his mistake.

It's your turn. Acknowledge your misinterpretation or don't. He.made his decision. Well?



Rinselberg hasn't gone anywhere, it's not his style.
My turn,?
You still haven't even explained your comments, you rarely do. IF, there is a misunderstanding it is simple enough to clear up just by you explaining your point of view more clearly,...it really is that simple. You communicate in riddles and insults, so yes it is easy to come to conclusions you didn't intend,....but it isn't my fault or Rinselberg's.
sourmash NOV 14, 06:09 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:


Rinselberg hasn't gone anywhere, it's not his style.
My turn,?
You still haven't even explained your comments, you rarely do. IF, there is a misunderstanding it is simple enough to clear up just by you explaining your point of view more clearly,...it really is that simple. You communicate in riddles and insults, so yes it is easy to come to conclusions you didn't intend,....but it isn't my fault or Rinselberg's.



The explanation is in the post directly above that one you're commenting about Rinse. This just keeps getting whackier with you. You're asking this after I put it in a complete explanation and you still can't understand it. You aren't usually so confused. Is there something about yourself I should know to explain your inability to comprehend? Seriously.

But, yes. It's Rinse's typical to avoid admitting his mistake. So far you're doing the same. So show a quote of my stating non-Christians can't be leaders. You might as well admit it, dude. It's painfully obvious that you're avoiding it.
2.5 NOV 14, 06:56 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:
YOU are way off base and having a disagreement with someone you invented in your mind



I know this wasn't aimed at myself, but I noticed this seems to be what you do alot, hedge people into categories you create. I like to think I might enjoy our opinion on the actual subjects of the threads.
sourmash NOV 14, 07:14 PM
I like to stick with the facts.

Read my initial statement THAT HE QUOTED (twice) where he says he disagrees with me for saying these people can't be leaders. You'll note that I never said they can't be leaders. Which means they can still be leaders in my scenario. People should just know what they believe.

Prove me wrong. You obviously haven't bothered to read what you're commenting about. Try it. Buck the herd for a change. Freedom awaits.

You also should understand that "alot" is incorrect. You use it a lot. I've noticed.

Willie uses herd logic like Limbaugh taught. If you're a Republican you think you're a conservative. If you don't agree with him on Republicanism then you're a Democrat. Limbaugh was a drug addict. Conservatism has no party. Republicanism isn't conservatism.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 11-14-2021).]

Jake_Dragon NOV 14, 07:25 PM
Some people do act like some of the chat "robots" that had only a few people interact with. Then they found each other and had long conversations about a snail and its fear of salt.
williegoat NOV 14, 07:28 PM

quote
Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:

Some people do act like some of the chat "robots" that had only a few people interact with. Then they found each other and had long conversations about a snail and its fear of salt.




Regarding the question posed in the thread title, that I exist is the only fact of which I am certain. This is expressed by Descartes’ assertion, “Cogito ergo sum.” Y’all could be a figment of my imagination, an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of underdone potato. There's more of gravy than of grave about you, whatever you are.

Regarding the discussion in the video, I agree with Shapiro that immersion in the “metaverse” could mean the end of civilization and the eventual demise of mankind, altogether.
williegoat NOV 14, 07:30 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Willie uses herd logic like Limbaugh taught. If you're a Republican you think you're a conservative. If you don't agree with him on Republicanism then you're a Democrat. Limbaugh was a drug addict. Conservatism has no party. Republicanism isn't conservatism.



You know, if you are really that fascinated by what I think, you should just buy the book. No, I will not help you find it.
sourmash NOV 14, 07:43 PM
Sounds like sleep medication based on half of the topics that interest you. Notice almost nobody comments on them. Especially your musical threads.
rinselberg NOV 14, 07:52 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:
The Republican voter group is a largely Christian contingency or has a belief in Jesus Christ as God. A person who is belligerent to that belief who is PROMOTED as a voice of leadership for that group should be openly presented as such on the subject of Christ.


Is Ben Shapiro "belligerent" towards the Christian belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ? Is he "belligerent" towards this central tenet of Christianity because he does not ascribe to this belief, himself? I don't think there's a straight line that goes from Ben Shapiro not sharing in this belief, all the way to Ben Shapiro is (or has been) "belligerent" towards this belief. Perhaps you could enlarge (in a small way) on why you said "belligerent."

Then there's the matter of "openly presented." This suggests to my mind that you think that not enough has been made of Ben Shapiro's allegiance to Judaism. In my previous message--easy to find by looking for the photo of the Holometer experiment at FermiLab--I tried to draw you out on that point.

I don't know hardly anything about Ben Shapiro. I have only described him as an Orthodox Jew because when I got drawn into this forum conversation, I searched about him online.

I think this statement of yours--the statement that I've just quoted (again) at the top of this message--is "underperforming," and will continue to underperform, all the way into Q1 2022 and beyond, absent a clearer and more concrete enlargement upon it, from yourself. An enlargement, along the lines of a midcourse correction, or a restructuring of its architectural outline to broaden its base. Or something.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-14-2021).]