 
     |
| KYLE RITTENHOUSE TRIAL (Page 4/16) |
|
randye
|
NOV 08, 10:08 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
I also am no expert on Wisconsin Penal codes but, based on what I have seen in the videos, I'm baffled as to how they came up with some of the charges against this young man.
Rams
|
|
This should have NEVER gone to trial.
Neither the facts, Wisconsin penal codes, Wisconsin statutes or the law had anything to do with bringing homicide charges against that kid.
POLITICS did.
Additionally, there was very likely the assumption that they could intimidate this jury the same as the Derrick Chauvin jury was intimidated, however the facts, evidence and especially the witnesses make this case an entirely "different animal" and there may be no appeasing of the radical Left demanding this kid's head but as I said before, you can never guess what a jury will do....especially a frightened jury.
This case isn't about "justice".
It's about trying to appease the mob and prevent more rioting.....(which is already being threatened again)[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-09-2021).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
NOV 09, 04:38 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
This should have NEVER gone to trial.
SNIP
This case isn't about "justice".
It's about trying to appease the mob and prevent more rioting.....(which is already being threatened again)
|
|
It does appear (from my perspective) you hit the nail on the head with that last sentence.
Rams
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
NOV 09, 08:54 AM
|
|
|
Only partially. It's about teaching a certain group that they will be punished for standing in the gap. The gap was intentionally created. The mob is intentionally emboldened by the same people creating the gap.
|
|
|
|
maryjane
|
NOV 09, 07:07 PM
|
|
|
The prosecution 'rested' it's case earlier today. Defense began.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
NOV 09, 07:46 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by maryjane:
The prosecution 'rested' it's case earlier today. Defense began. |
|
"Once the prosecution rested, Judge Bruce Schroeder agreed to dismiss a curfew violation charge against Rittenhouse, ruling that prosecutors had failed to present any evidence a curfew was in place."
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11...l-tuesday/index.html
The prosecution rested it's case after also failing to present any evidence that Mr. Rittenhouse didn't act in self defense.
..........................................................................................................................
I have a close friend who is a Florida Circuit Court judge. We've known each other for many years and he is the one who prodded me to go to law school.
He once told me that " Cross examination is the best tool devised by the mind of man for the determination of the TRUTH".
I haven't followed the videos or transcripts in minute detail but, from what I've seen, young Mr. Rittenhouse's associate defense counsel, Corey Chirafisi, seems to have done all of the "heavy lifting" so far with regard to cross examining the prosecution's witnesses and what is apparent is that he is a master at the art.
It obviously doesn't hurt that the prosecution has such horrible witnesses but watching Mr. Chirafisi take these witnesses apart so deftly and get the truth out of them is a beautiful thing to behold.
 [This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-10-2021).]
|
|
|
|
Rickady88GT
|
NOV 09, 11:20 PM
|
|
|
They should have dropped the charges and let him go a long time ago to avoid a lot of embarrassment
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
NOV 10, 08:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
blackrams
|
NOV 10, 07:38 PM
|
|
Saw a short clip today of the Judge (after sending jury out) ripped the Prosecuting attorney a new one. I would have liked to have been watching the Defense attorney's faces. I'm sure it pleased them.
Rams
|
|
|
|
randye
|
NOV 10, 08:10 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
Saw a short clip today of the Judge (after sending jury out) ripped the Prosecuting attorney a new one. I would have liked to have been watching the Defense attorney's faces. I'm sure it pleased them.
Rams |
|
It pleased them very much.
Prosecutorial misconduct. They know that have a losing case on their hands now and they tried a very dirty stunt and didn't get away with it.
"During cross-examination by lead prosecutor Thomas Binger, Judge Bruce Schroeder twice paused the proceedings to admonish Binger over improper lines of questioning.
Afterward, defense attorney Corey Chirafisi asked for a mistrial with prejudice and suggested that Binger's questions were an intentional attempt to "provoke a mistrial in order to get another kick at the cat because the first trial is going badly."
(Judge) Schroeder said he would consider the request.
https://www.npr.org/2021/11...se-testimony-kenosha
NEVER VIOLATE A JUDGE'S PRETRIAL ORDER...NEVER ARGUE WITH A JUDGE....NEVER ATTEMPT TO "SCHOOL" A JUDGE
JUDGE IS PISSED OFF
KYLE RITTENHOUSE DIRECT EXAMINATION
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-10-2021).]
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
NOV 11, 06:07 AM
|
|
|
KR could still be convicted. Several groups have conducted informal polls where the person being polled said he was guilty because he shouldn't have been there. My guess is these people were perfectly fine with the burning and looting and feel no one has a right to defend themselves. Damn shame it took a 17 year old to stand up to the mob.
|
|
|
