

 |
| The legacy of biden grows,....down (Page 4/10) |
|
randye
|
AUG 16, 10:37 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by FieroSTETZ:
I'll generally state my intentions pretty plainly.
|
|
Which is why it's manifestly obvious that you're here to argue and insult people while attempting to pretend that you're somehow "above the vulgar fray".
In the time that you have been absent young Mr. "Fiero S TETZ****" we have seen a lot of pompous young pretenders just like you come and go.
You arrived on this forum at the "ripe old age" of 17 and in the intervening years, other than becoming marginally more glib, you don't seem to have developed much beyond that, so drop the bullshit pretense.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 16, 11:47 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
Which is why it's manifestly obvious that you're here to simply argue and insult people while attempting to pretend that you're somehow "above the vulgar fray".
In the time that you have been absent young Mr. "Fiero S TETZ****" we have seen a lot of pompous young pretenders just like you come and go.
You arrived on this forum at the "ripe old age" of 17 and in the intervening years, other than becoming marginally more glib, you don't seem to have developed much beyond that, so drop the bullshit pretense.
|
|
I don't care about the fray, it holds no interest for me. You're in here, again, gesticulating wildly and throwing around assumptions and insults. It's exactly as I remembered!
Now you've learned to threaten to dox people because you learned how google works - thats new it does violate the forum rules, so be careful 
I just thought it was funny when I came back and the first thread I saw was you and someone else getting pretty heated over whether Alexander the great was gay or not I think. It stuck with me because it was amusing.[This message has been edited by FieroSTETZ (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 17, 12:08 AM
|
|

Because nothing says "I'm a hyperventilating buffoon with a hopelessly outsized opinion of myself" like the royal we.
FieroSTETZ probably feels an urgent need to shower, after being breathed upon by the likes of that.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 17, 12:29 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:

Nothing says "I'm a hyperventilating buffoon with a hopelessly outsized opinion of myself" like the royal we.
FieroSTETZ probably feels an urgent need to shower, after being breathed upon by the likes of that.
|
|
:sigh: again with the assuming and projecting
|
|
|
williegoat
|
AUG 17, 12:43 AM
|
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 17, 12:50 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
 |
|
Ha is that the queen playing wii I'm saving that. - sidebar, I'm trying to find an old thread and not finding it in search - it was about a member refinishing an old aluminum airstream, does anyone remember that? It was specifically about refinishing the aluminum I think.[This message has been edited by FieroSTETZ (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|
|
williegoat
|
AUG 17, 12:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by FieroSTETZ:
Ha is that the queen playing wii I'm saving that.
|
|
It is the Royal Wii.
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 17, 01:07 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
It is the Royal Wii. |
|
|
|
|
randye
|
AUG 17, 01:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by FieroSTETZ:
Now you've learned to threaten to dox people because you learned how google works - thats new it does violate the forum rules, so be careful 
|
|
"dox people" ...derp...derp..."learned how google works""..derp...derp...
If I had publically disclosed personal information about you (that you didn't already disclose yourself), then you would have a valid "forum rules complaint"......
....but I didn't.... so you don't.
Additionally, it cannot reasonably be called "dox" or "doxing" if you use the same dumb nickname EVERYWHERE....FOR YEARS.... and you leave a huge web trail that a blind man could easily follow.
You are about the same age as my children and they have successfully learned about the importance of personal privacy on the internet and how to maintain it, a simple skill that you quite obviously lack.
| quote | Originally posted by FieroSTETZ:
gesticulating wildly
|
|
By the way it's also obvious that you don't understand the meaning of the word "gesticulate" and you are looking (even more) stupid trying to use it attempting to insult me, however since you are clearly enamored with that term here is a gesticulation just for you:

I've already given you a lot more attention in this thread than you merit and I wouldn't have given you any attention except that you chose to insult me without provocation or cause.
What is most notable is how you have contributed nothing substantive to the discussion topic but instead chose from the outset to focus on other forum members.
| quote | Originally posted by FieroSTETZ:
It speaks volumes.
|
|
Yes it does.
You should pull up your pants now, your little agenda is hanging out.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 17, 02:37 AM
|
|
Before anything else - Mr. Rogers randye? Is nothing sacred? I know he did it during the thumbkin song but... it's Mr. Rogers :|
--
It's disingenuous to claim you weren't making a thinly veiled threat to disclose personal information. Whether you did a google search or hired a PI, disclosing a person's information in a public forum with malicious intent is doxing. That's the definition in merriam webster, and that's what it looked like you were implying.
--
I say "wildly gesticulating" with frequency because I find it funny to picture it as follows:

With that context, picturing you doing that every time you make a grumpy post is incredibly funny. The bold pink text re: Alexander the great - WITH the flailing arms? The first thread I opened on my return (the Alexander the great one, unfortunately not the Julie Newmar one) had you doing the exact same thing I remembered and I found it *funny*, so I referenced it. I went back and re-read it, and I still don't think it was insulting. I reiterate that it was said tongue in cheek, but if you insist on being offended by it I cannot stop you - it's your choice. I think if I was trying to be deliberately insulting, I probably would've been a lot more obvious or aggressive about it.
The only "agenda" I had was, as stated, to explore the data that led to some of the claims made in the original post.[This message has been edited by FieroSTETZ (edited 08-17-2021).]
|
|

 |
|