Google search - interesting results (Page 4/7)
williegoat JUL 12, 01:32 PM
Acosta has resigned.
(in before rinselberg)

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-12-2019).]

randye JUL 12, 03:22 PM

quote
Originally posted by williegoat:

It seems that the left is working very hard to discredit the one guy who just might know more about the Epstein case than anyone other than Epstein or Clinton.



I shouldn't have to say it again, but....

The truth always eventually comes out and it is NEVER what the leftist media originally told you.
williegoat JUL 12, 04:19 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

Igor Derysh, Kathleen Parker
Dahlia Lithwick, and old Julie Brown.

Oh that line forms on the right, babe
Now that Jeffrey's back in town



Years ago, I was watching this video with a friend who was an accomplished drummer (now passed). He could not get over the fact that Darin was snapping his fingers on one and three.
rinselberg JUL 13, 11:46 AM
I think there are a number of other shoes that could be dropping in connection with the Alexander Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein saga. I have questions.

According to a segment that I just viewed on the Rachel Maddow show that was broadcast earlier this week, even before Acosta announced his resignation, part of what Acosta released at his press conference was a document with parts of an official letter, on DOJ letterhead, from the lead U.S. attorney on the Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida or SDFL. That attorney was reporting directly to Alexander Acosta. This is from December, 2007.

The letter was addressed to the defense lawyer that was heading up Epstein's legal defense and Epstein's negotiations with the Southern District of Florida, and there were two sentences of that letter that I think are remarkable:

The first was that SDFL--Acosta's office--had notified three underage victims about the now famously concealed federal non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, but had stopped that process, and did not notify any of the other 27 known underage victims because Epstein's lawyer asked SDFL to stop this victim notifications process. This is what eventually led a federal judge to declare that the Acosta-brokered non-prosecution agreement was in violation of federal law.

The second was an assertion by the federal prosecutor that neither Epstein or his lawyers had any honest intentions of honoring the conditions imposed upon them by the non-prosecution agreeement or NPA, and had already violated (some of) those conditions.

I am not read in on what exactly those conditions were about, but it is a startling assertion, and raises the obvious question, that if the NPA was, almost immediately after its signing, already not being honored by Epstein and his lawyers, and if SDFL had concluded that there was no honest intention of fully honoring the NPA on the part of Epstein and his lawyers, why didn't the SDFL declare the NPA null and void and either roll out the 53-page federal indictment that had been drafted against Epstein, or keep the case open and continue to investigate and work towards building an even more "bulletproof" courtroom case against Epstein?

I think that investigation could have been continued and interwoven with efforts to prevent any new and additional underage victims from falling prey to Epstein. I would want to at least submit this idea about it (on my part) as a question. Was that a reasonable option for SDFL?

It's known that Alexander Acosta had prior friendly association with Jay Lefkowitz, who was part of Epstein's legal defense team and is the defense lawyer that I have been referencing here. The questions that spring from that observation are fairly obvious.

How did Epstein acquire his wealth? The narrative that he was a "genius" investor and honest but shrewd investment funds manager with wealthy clients seems to be somewhat suspect. How would that hold up under further investigations that (I hope) are going to continue?

And where was Bill Clinton in all of this, and how much did he actually know about it?

Seems like there's some nice investigative work in the offing here for AG Bill (William) Barr.

"Questions are the answers."

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-13-2019).]

williegoat JUL 13, 12:16 PM
This could be the beginning of the big "drain the swamp" purge, and the reason so many have been so afraid of Trump.

It is also possible that the people who told Acosta to back off, the same ones who pulled Comey's strings could still shut this whole thing down. We will (hopefully) see.....

As I said above, I have a theory. But I might just be a crazy old retired truck driver.

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-13-2019).]

williegoat JUL 13, 12:31 PM


[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 07-13-2019).]

randye JUL 14, 04:18 AM
Tony Kania JUL 14, 11:20 AM
You fine folks are going to see more glee from me in the upcoming months. Got to admit it here, it feels damn good to know which side one is on. No flim flam here.

Feet planted, and firmly rooted in truths.
Hudini JUL 14, 10:15 PM
I like how rinselberg immediately trolls the post with a deflection.

Clinton flew 26 times on Epstein's plane that we know about. I would love to talk to his Secret Service detail.
MadMark JUL 14, 10:59 PM
In between this investigation and the whole Russian Collusion counter investigation now by the AG, it could really get interesting in Washington. It would sure be nice to see the perpetrators of this hoax put in prison. There is no way that there was not illegal, unconstitutional and even treasonous things that have happened. All with the promotion of the Democrats the main stream media. Surveilling US citizens without proper reasoning is a violation of their constitutional rights. Colluding with British and Russians to come up with this Dossier is also a crime. Lying to congress, revealing secrets to their friends in the media all are crimes.

To me it looks like the timing is going to be just about perfect. All of this seems like it will come to head within a year of the next Presidential Election. And what a hoot the Democrats are right now. 23 candidates and all of them want to give everything away to the illegals and even to eliminate ICE and all laws that control the border. Tie that in with all of them trying to outdo the others with their adherence to Socialism. It just makes me wonder what the heck they are thinking. Do they really think that Socialism is going to work here in the US? When it has not worked anywhere else and ends up with an Authoritarian regime and all of us plebes equal, but poor beyond belief. Want recent examples just look at Venezuela, or Cuba. How many times do you want to see a government kill off its own people? Look to the 20th Century to see what Socialism/Communism/Nazism toll of human life is. Over 100 million dead by the hands of their own government.

[This message has been edited by MadMark (edited 07-14-2019).]