The Trump Impeachment Proceedings (Page 32/49)
Tony Kania JAN 16, 12:45 PM
A lot of California is represented in The Great Impeachment Managers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I0Mw1tBhdo
olejoedad JAN 16, 12:56 PM
Yeah, I think they are in over their heads.
I will not throw a life preserver.
Tony Kania JAN 16, 01:21 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

The Articles have been delivered and read to the Senate.

Adam Schiff has proven one thing, he can read.

Rams




Have you tried Bloomberg for dinner? It is the alternative to real meat dontcha know?
williegoat JAN 16, 01:44 PM
OK....now I'm scared.
E.Furgal JAN 16, 08:45 PM

quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:


Honestly I don't see any of this as work for the Senate. It is dead on arrival no matter what the House does. The Senate was threatening to just simply dismiss it outright.



Doesn't have too, the goal is to keep it in the news and public's ears. as long as she can.
The old tell a lie enough times, thing.
Jury of public opinion, She is doing this to try to get the swing voters on their side.
She knows it is DOA as soon as it leaves the house, and why it won't be for a while.
To her, the longer it is in the news the better.
rinselberg JAN 17, 03:56 AM
This Lev Parnas
was just interviewed on-air, on a certain known (maybe not well known) TV network. A TV network where one of the daytime anchors, the other day, said "It's Nancy Pelosi's world, and we just live in it."

He (Lev Parnas) made some references to the "Veep"... Mike Pence.

There's this "multiple worlds" theory that still gets talked about in the Science section, in relation to Quantum Physics and Cosmology. So there "could" be a kind of parallel world where both President Trump and the Vice President Pence are impeached and removed from office, and voila... President Nancy Pelosi.

Click to show

If I wanted to, I could (probably) produce a screen image from this forum where I speculated on the possibility of a "double play" that would "force out" both the President and the Vice President in this way. But then, it would have led to President Paul Ryan (anyone remember him?)

Click to show

That was early on, during or during the run-up to the Mueller investigation. Maybe when the first "clues" started to emerge in the New York Times and the Washington Post during the "24 Days of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn." At the beginning of 2017.

You could say that the President crossed the line--or came close to crossing the line--when he tried to "Lev-erage" the powers of his office for [fill in the blank.]

Click to show

Or not.


Now back to your regularly scheduled programming. I didn't come here to be "real." Not tonight, anyway.


"PS" Where is this forum member?

Click to show

Long time (lately), no see.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-17-2020).]

blackrams JAN 17, 05:49 AM

quote
Originally posted by E.Furgal:


Doesn't have too, the goal is to keep it in the news and public's ears. as long as she can.
The old tell a lie enough times, thing.
Jury of public opinion, She is doing this to try to get the swing voters on their side.
She knows it is DOA as soon as it leaves the house, and why it won't be for a while.
To her, the longer it is in the news the better.



Agreed. It's all about those swing voters and the Dems trying to get them to cross over.
Now, she will always say she tried to do something about that evil DJT.
This has become one of those never ending dramas. It appears that Days of Our Lives has a few fans within the Dem leadership.
I sincerely hope her district wakes up and sends her packing but, the chances are greater that SF will drop off into the Pacific first.

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 01-17-2020).]

rinselberg JAN 17, 01:53 PM
Picking up here again, from where I stopped last night... what was that, anyway? A "weak side (t)rollout"..? There was some confusion in the backfield right after the snap.

Back in the year 2020, during what became known as the "Ukraine-gate" episode, the Government Accountability Office, described as a nonpartisan watchdog kind of agency that reported to Congress, issued a finding that President Donald Trump and his administration had violated a stricture about federal budget expenditures that had been a part of so-called "black letter" federal law since 1974.

Click to show

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-17-2020).]

olejoedad JAN 17, 02:01 PM
You were saying?


https://bongino.com/flashba...n-broke-federal-law/
rinselberg JAN 17, 02:23 PM
Well, I'll check that out. Later. Time for me to be somewhere else.