Germany an ‘occupied state says Russia. (Page 3/4)
sourmash FEB 10, 01:32 PM
That is saying nothing while just saying words.

The image is what I pictured you were talking about. Truespoke made wire wheels, and still makes them, specifically for Cadillac. Those aren't what I pictured, but. The fact that Mexicans put them on low riders doesn't dictate how they were conceived to be used initially.

Is that an example of your perception of what I say?

Anyway, here's what I'm picturing. I didn't picture a sled.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 02-10-2022).]

82-T/A [At Work] FEB 10, 01:44 PM


quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Is that an example of your perception of what I say?




100%



quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

Anyway, here's what I'm picturing. I didn't picture a sled.







That's not bad looking... I've lost a lot of interest in GM though since the forced-bankruptcy, Government take-over, and then subsequent giving away of a 30 billion dollar asset to the United Auto Workers union as a pay-off. I could never really figure out why the US Government felt that GM and Chrysler needed 52 billion dollars of taxpayer money to bail them out of something that really wasn't their problem, but the potential collapse of the union (which wouldn't have been a problem for GM at all).

My last GM car was my Pontiac Solstice. I even had a GM credit card which I used to earn points towards a new GM vehicle. The new Corvette is nice, but there's nothing that GM has that interests me *at-all* anymore. I sold my Solstice because there's no back seat, and I had 9 cars, and needed something that I could put my child in. I kept the Fiero though.

But over the past few years, I've just bought Fords... and I see nothing in GM's line-up that interests me.


I do still have that Oldsmobile 455 big block, and I may still go buy a big 60s / 70s car that I can drop it in... I just don't have the time anymore.
sourmash FEB 10, 01:48 PM
I also like low riders.
blackrams FEB 10, 02:55 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:






That's a nice looking convertible but, you couldn't give it to me today. Fuel has gotten too expensive and getting parts for that convertible could be extremely difficult.

Rams
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 10, 04:49 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


That's a nice looking convertible but, you couldn't give it to me today. Fuel has gotten too expensive and getting parts for that convertible could be extremely difficult.

Rams




I could be completely wrong, and I assume someone will correct me, but I don't think that year Cadillac actually came as a convertible, I have to assume that all of the ones that were done like that, were probably dealer-ordered kits... like C&C T-Tops or other things that GM does Camaro SS / Firebird Firehawk, etc. Does look really well put together and very clean, I don't know that generation of that platform enough to know if it was a full-framed either, or some form of uni-body / hybrid.

When I cut the roof off the Cadillac that I had, I didn't know enough about cars back then to even know if it would be a problem. Although they were no longer selling a convertible in 78 (and maybe 77 and 76?), that chassis was designed from the beginning to support a convertible... re: Boss Hog's car. It is in fact a hybrid uni-body and framed car. There's a large subframe that the engine sits in, and connects all the way to just before the rear wheels... so, the body bolts directly to this. If I remember correctly, the rear suspension then ties into end of the subframe, and connects to the unibody portion in the back... none of which is overly important back there because of course, it's front wheel drive. I assume the one above is also front wheel drive as well.


Random, but my friend and I found a really rare 1971 Cadillac Eldorado Convertible in the junkyard. A tree had fallen on it during the storm. I assume maybe a tree fell on a garage, which then fell on the car. But the car had 21k miles on it, and it was all original... immaculate... except for the fact that it looked like a phone pole or tree fell on the middle of it. Best part though, it had the FULL 500 cubic inch Cadillac V8 in it... with all the fixings. U-Pull-It of Davie, Florida... sold my friend the complete engine, with everything attached, for $250 bucks back in... 2008 or 2009? Fantastic motor that was.
rinselberg FEB 10, 04:50 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
And? None of that applies to what you're saying. Every time you take an elevator with the "Thyssen Krupp" logo, do you tell the other occupants... "No, sorry... Krupp made all the military hardware that fought our allies in WW2, I'm taking the stairs."


If I was taking an elevator, how could I be taking the stairs?

Great discussion but a lot of it is over my head.



cvxjet FEB 10, 07:31 PM
Take that older car, and install an LS V8 and 4 speed trans....a little (Secret) air management in front, and you could get 18-20 mpg in town and 30+ on the highway.....If you can add that intriguing Flywheel/starter/generator (From the trucks a few years ago) on it with start/stop, you could actually get the in-town mpg up around 25.

I actually wonder what a Fiero would do with a 3900 with DOD/AFM....Possibly get up around 24-26 in town and then 35+ on the highway....(Yet have 240 HP to play with)
82-T/A [At Work] FEB 10, 07:54 PM

quote
Originally posted by cvxjet:

Take that older car, and install an LS V8 and 4 speed trans....a little (Secret) air management in front, and you could get 18-20 mpg in town and 30+ on the highway.....If you can add that intriguing Flywheel/starter/generator (From the trucks a few years ago) on it with start/stop, you could actually get the in-town mpg up around 25.

I actually wonder what a Fiero would do with a 3900 with DOD/AFM....Possibly get up around 24-26 in town and then 35+ on the highway....(Yet have 240 HP to play with)




Those cars were weird, they used a longitudinally mounted engine. In the prior generation, it was the TH-425, and in that one above (early to mid 80s), it was the TH-325 if I'm not mistaken. Basically, the motor sat longitudinally, and there was basically no driveshaft, it was almost a direct connection from the torque-converter to the differential housing... pretty wild. I'm not a fan of front wheel drive, but the efficiency loss was far less significant than say, the rear wheel drive equivalent Cadillac sedan that saw anywhere from 15-20% drivetrain loss.

I can't remember if the LS motors had the same bolt pattern as the older small block Chevy, but you could certainly put an LS motor in there, and just use highway gears.


This is the 425 (for the big block). I couldn't really find a good Th325 picture for the SBCs... but it basically connects the engine to the differential using what is effectively a 1 foot long super wide chain. They are super durable.




It also requires a special oil pan too in order to clear one of the drive-shafts.


EDIT: There's also a super-special version of the Th-400 / Th-425, it's called the "Switch Pitch." They also offer the "Switch Pitch" option on another transmission known as the TH-300 (which was like a Th-350) as well. It was a VERY, VERY cool "performance" option that was offered for vehicles in certain numbers in the 70s and early 80s. Basically, it was a torque converter that allowed for different stall speeds. Coming out of the same hole where the connector to engage the torque lockup, there would be a second prong that, when grounded, engaged the switch pitch. Basically, this switch would be mounted UNDER the gas pedal. When you SLAMMED the gas pedal down, it allowed the RPM stall speed of the torque converter to be something like 3,200 rpms, where as in normal driving conditions, the stall speed would instead be only 2,200 rpms (give or take depending on options).

This was hugely awesome because it meant you could actually have a vehicle that performed really well in a drag-race, but that could still accelerate normal if you weren't going crazy. They used them more commonly though in the lower horsepower cars, like V6s and such with the Th-300 because it allowed the V6 to rev more quickly and get up into the power range.

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 02-10-2022).]

Raydar FEB 10, 09:09 PM

quote
Originally posted by cvxjet:
...
I actually wonder what a Fiero would do with a 3900 with DOD/AFM....Possibly get up around 24-26 in town and then 35+ on the highway....(Yet have 240 HP to play with)



VVT was a good idea, in that engine and the 3.5 which was based on similar architecture. The DOD, OTOH, not so much.
One of the folks on this forum had an Impala with the DOD 3.9, and mentioned that it was really uninspiring. Rough and gutless in DOD mode, and didn't save enough fuel to make it worthwhile.

FWIW, I've got a 2010 G6 GT with the VVT3.5. (220 HP instead of 240). I have often thought that it would be a superb swap into a Fiero.
And that's even with all the GM "nannyware", that stops the 4T45E from fragging itself under all that power.
(All kidding aside, whoever wrote the program for that particular trans in that particular car should have received a huge bonus. It's one of the best, most useful, shift routines I've ever driven in a GM 4 speed automatic.)

[This message has been edited by Raydar (edited 02-10-2022).]

randye FEB 10, 09:50 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

Germany should be an occupied country.

Historically, they have not been good neighbors.




Germany has been the source of a lot of very bad things: