CV-19 PILL ANTI-VIRAL FROM Merck IN TESTING (Page 3/5)
sourmash OCT 02, 10:10 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
I give no credence whatsoever...
Asserting that the survival rate is 99.996% (or 99.995%, as sourmash put it) is a serious underestimation of the potential negative effects of becoming infected by the Covid virus.



Learn to read more carefully. I didn't say that percentage. And do you think people give your statement much credence?

It depends on age. The younger you are the higher it is. On the whole it has a 99.985% survival rate.

Nobody knows how just how bad off the injected are going to be as time goes on. I'm positive the more they get injected the greater the risk to their health.

There's a reason they don't count Injection deaths until 15 days after being jabbed.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 10-02-2021).]

blackrams OCT 02, 10:23 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


And we know that's a bunch of crap. Everybody knows covid has a 99.985% survival rate. That's the stat that matters.



Did I suggest anything about survival rates? Don't think so. Read it again and try to comprehend.

Rams
steve308 OCT 02, 10:25 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


Learn to read more carefully. I didn't say that percentage. And do you think people give your statement much credence?

It depends on age. The younger you are the higher it is. On the whole it has a 99.985% survival rate.

Nobody knows how just how bad off the injected are going to be as time goes on. I'm positive the more they get injected the greater the risk to their health.




So don't get the shot.
Jake_Dragon OCT 02, 10:28 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Jake, you're correct, we don't know the long term effects of the Vaccine(s) and, we also don't know all the long term effects of actually getting the virus.
All I can say is pick your path.

Rams



No one is able to pick their path. I pick the path that leads to not releasing a deadly virus into the wild.
It is what it is, I am no afraid for myself. I have no intention of having any off spring.
sourmash OCT 02, 10:50 PM

quote
Originally posted by steve308:
So don't get the shot.



So the injected need to stop loading unsubstantiated bullcrap against pure-blood people on the internet.
blackrams OCT 02, 10:53 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


So the injected need to stop loading unsubstantiated bullcrap against pure-blood people on the internet.



This just had to be quoted...................

Rams
sourmash OCT 02, 10:54 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
Did I suggest anything about survival rates? Don't think so. Read it again and try to comprehend.

Rams



You said that us pure-blooded people draw info from some erroneous sources.

I countered that the survival rate is my source for why the injections are needless (in the opinion of most of us who avoid the shot agenda). We should all be up to speed now.

sourmash OCT 02, 10:57 PM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:This just had to be quoted................... Rams



So far nobody has taken the time to successfully rebut the articles I post, but maybe that's because you know it can't be done.

You made a claim above that all of us pure-blooded use junk sources as a reason not to get a trial shot. Prove it.

You're a really weird reasoning type of person. How come things have to be re-explained to you so often? I'm sure I know why, but maybe I'm asking if YOU know why?

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 10-02-2021).]

blackrams OCT 02, 11:31 PM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


So the injected need to stop loading unsubstantiated bullcrap against pure-blood people on the internet.



Unsubstantiated ? Go do a count of the threads against COVID vaccinations that are only slightly based on some weird version of science. I don't see pro-vaccine folks doing much of anything. Most of us don't care what you and other anti-vaxers do.


quote
Originally posted by sourmash:


So far nobody has taken the time to successfully rebut the articles I post, but maybe that's because you know it can't be done.

You made a claim above that all of us pure-blooded use junk sources as a reason not to get a trial shot. Prove it.

You're a really weird reasoning type of person. How come things have to be re-explained to you so often? I'm sure I know why, but maybe I'm asking if YOU know why?




I've grown tired of your You wouldn't admit you were wrong if proven a thousand times.

You can claim victory if you wish. I honestly don't care.

Rams
sourmash OCT 02, 11:47 PM

quote

Unsubstantiated ? Go do a count of the threads against COVID vaccinations that are only slightly based on some weird version of science. I don't see pro-vaccine folks doing much of anything. Most of us don't care what you and other anti-vaxers do.



They're constantly shaming pure-blooded people or calling for them to be denied medical care. It never ends with the injectionists.

You did it here yourself telling me how sick I'm going to be if I didn't take the experimental shots. You said you don't want unjabbed people around you until the press admitted that jabbed people spread the virus and are creating break-through variants.

It's common knowledge FBI agents are instigating most terror scares that they thwart and the same is true of the whacko stories about anti-vaxxers so they can make people believe that's what we think. It's called POISONING THE WELL, a tactic created to discredit.


quote
I've grown tired of your You wouldn't admit you were wrong if proven a thousand times.

You can claim victory if you wish. I honestly don't care. Rams



What BS? It's all common knowledge. Prove it's bs if you're so sure. You're the one making false claims about why we don't take dangerous injections. It's because you'll live if you get it. Someone in my family got really sick with it but she has a condition where she's susceptible to getting pneumonia.

My progressive-liberal friend Ive known forever will always bolt when he gets cornered in discussion.