quote Originally posted by rinselberg: I doubt that you've heard the end of that. And I don't mean just the end of that from me.

Your predictions are the same as the Super Bowl records for the Cleveland Browns, Detroit Lions and Jacksonville Jaguars.

From the Mueller investigation to impeachment to General Flynn your prognostications have ALL been consistently and spectacularly:

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 03-17-2021).]

quote Originally posted by cvxjet: And here is Randy....Telling us what he heard from his RUSSIAN "News" sources......Always good to here what russia says about >>Russian<< interference....... SO did russia pay bounties on US troops and your happy about that? Or.....Did that never happen....Which is it Rusandy?

My Lord you must have consumed vast amounts of that kool aid.
Before you respond, please note, I'm not a Trump fan. You really do have a heart full of hate.
Tell me this, did President Trump do one thing you approved of during his term?
I couldn't bring myself to vote for President Obama but, I do give him credit for the few things he did that I thought were in America's interest. There's not much there that he did I approved of but, I can't think of any President that was 100% wrong on everything he did.

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 03-17-2021).]

quote Originally posted by sourmash: My source calls it correctly! The chute wipe rag that ot busted reporting fake news doesn't get to determine the definition. They relinquish that when admitting they faked the claim. It's not a misspelling. It's not an incorrect date. It's fake news you broadcast. Thank you for confirming my statement about your honesty.

Just for the record, I invoked the Internet Time Machine or Wayback Machine in an attempt to reveal to myself the first report about this in the Washington Post, back in January. "This" being the telephone conversation between (then) President Donald J. Trump and Frances Watson, who was (and is, I would think) an official within the Georgia Department of State who had a remit to investigate any credible evidence of fraud, dishonesty or significant irregularities in the national election of 2020 in the state of Georgia. This was a telephone conversation that was initiated by President Trump (he placed the call) and took place on December 23, 2020, give or take a day or two. "Shortly before Christmas." I think I've seen it narrowed to December 23.

I made this one attempt, but it didn't work. It did not reveal to me the first or original report about this in the Washington Post. I can only see the report as it was subsequently updated on March 11, after the report was changed and updated on the basis of an audio recording of the Trump-Watson telephone conversation which later emerge. This updated report starts with a "Correction" paragraph which I posted here in one of my previous messages in this thread.

WaPo also reported about the audio recording on March 11.

Without an easy way for me to go back to the first reporting about this in WaPo, I cannot agree with these remarks (above) from sourmash, about the Washington Post, and about me.

I would like an easy way to see how it was originally reported in the Washington Post. Did the report just flat out say that "President Trump said" this and that during the phone call? Or was it reported as "according to a a well placed source inside (or close to) the Georgia Department of State, President Trump said" this and that.

I think that would make a difference in how I would weigh the significance of sourmash's commentary here. . But I don't have it. I guess it's "out there" but I am reluctant to pursue this any further, because of the constraints of time. It's like an episode of "The X-Files" that was setup for a sequel episode that was never produced. The episodic TV series came to its end before that sequel was ever produced.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-18-2021).]

quote Originally posted by rinselberg: Without an easy way for me to go back to the first reporting about this in WaPo, ...

There is an easy way. Easy Peasy. The WaPo/NY Slimes admitted they were ...

quote Originally posted by rinselberg: I would like an easy way to see how it was originally reported in the Washington Post. Did the report just flat out say that "President Trump said" this and that during the phone call? Or was it reported as "according to a a well placed source inside (or close to) the Georgia Department of State, President Trump said" this and that.

Can you believe your own eyes ? There are many clips out there of "news" outlets parroting the story, saying they also confirmed your President Trump's said that.

"to find the fraud". Which your President DID NOT say, as per a real life recording of the phone call.

What is a well placed source ? The same as an anonymous source ? Were you that anonymous source ?

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 03-18-2021).]