 
     |
| Illegal Aliens Voting (Page 2/2) |
|
blackrams
|
DEC 08, 03:21 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
A S is a very riechwing site
the author works for FOX
AND IT READS ABOUT HOW I EXPECTED
a pro limit the vote site
hint local elections are eazy to gimmick with the SOS tricks
gerrymanders limit enrollments with restrictions poll watchers to dispute
and of course only one place to vote on election day
limit or restrict mail in or drop off or alternate voting sites
and early voting or weekend voting forget it
the whole Gop plan is less votes the better
any way to restrict or limit or prevent that underclass from voting
btw why is the Gop afraid of native americans ? |
|
Ray,
You can make this about whatever you chose to make it about. Really doesn't matter to me. To a certain extent, you have a point, the GOP is concerned about illegal votes. You should be, we all should be. Yes, less illegal votes would be a more accurate and fairer election.
Rams
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
DEC 08, 04:47 PM
|
|
when anywhere from 5 % or so to maybe a max of 50% do vote
that means 9 out 10 do not vote in minor elections
and under 1/2 in most major ones
and that is the percent of REGISTERED VOTERS
NOT all people who can vote legally or all the people in the area
and the Gop's major thing is limiting the existing voter pool
no get out the vote or register to vote just PURGE THE ROLLS
at the open day of the vote pole does the Gop try to make voting eazyer quicker ect
HE!! NO they challenge voters to PROVE THEY ARE REAL their roll is to limit who votes
ONE PARTY WANTS PEOPLE TO VOTE
THE Gop DOES NOT
|
|
|
|
cvxjet
|
DEC 08, 04:53 PM
|
|
No-No-NO! Not "Illegal" aliens.......They are really trying to give voting rights to >>>LIZARD<<< aliens......You guys never get the story........"Right".....
 [This message has been edited by cvxjet (edited 12-08-2021).]
|
|
|
|
blackrams
|
DEC 08, 05:32 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
when anywhere from 5 % or so to maybe a max of 50% do vote
that means 9 out 10 do not vote in minor elections
and under 1/2 in most major ones
and that is the percent of REGISTERED VOTERS
NOT all people who can vote legally or all the people in the area
and the Gop's major thing is limiting the existing voter pool
no get out the vote or register to vote just PURGE THE ROLLS
at the open day of the vote pole does the Gop try to make voting eazyer quicker ect
HE!! NO they challenge voters to PROVE THEY ARE REAL their roll is to limit who votes
ONE PARTY WANTS PEOPLE TO VOTE
THE Gop DOES NOT |
|
Ray, that's  Both parties want as many votes as possible. Voting is a right that must be exercised and sought after, if a person is unwilling to take the steps to ensure that right, I guess you can blame whomever you wish but, that doesn't make you right. The difference is, one party is notorious for getting votes however they can and the other wants to ensure all votes are legal. It appears the difference is very apparent between who wants what and what they are willing to do to win. It says a lot about a person's character that is willing to cheat to win. It's so easy to register and to vote. There are already rules on the books to allow every "legal" citizen to vote if they want to vote. We both know that. There's a reason Dems get so little respect (like they really care) 
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 12-08-2021).]
|
|
|
|
BHall71
|
DEC 08, 08:59 PM
|
|
Damn Ray, I have never seen someone so drunk on the cool-aid as you. Hope you enjoy your new america.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
DEC 09, 02:29 AM
|
|
NFL coaches and game broadcasters talk about "complementary football." It sounds like a strange, if not outright bizarre idea. Should a Las Vegas Raiders cornerback shout "Good one..!" to a New England Patriots wideout that's just blown right past on the way to reeling in what is sure to be a long touchdown pass?
But then comes the realization that they're not talking about "complimentary football." It's the difference between an "e' and an "i".
What they mean by this verbal shorthand is the way that a strong performance from a team's Defense makes the game easier for their teammates on Offense, and vice-versa. Each is thereby complementary to the other, in terms of assessing a team's performance during a game that's been played, or predicting a team's performance in anticipation of a game that is scheduled, but is yet to be played. Or even a game that isn't on the schedule but is being imagined in a hypothetical scenario, like a possible postseason matchup of two contending teams as the end of the NFL regular season draws close.
In much the same way, Elections Integrity can only be assured when there is complementary Election Security in guarding against the Outsider Threat and the Insider Threat.
Illegal Aliens Voting (the topic of this thread) is essentially an "Outsider Threat" because an illegal alien is (generally) an individual that is not an Elections official or a contractor or vendor that's been tasked to function as part of the Elections process,; hence, an illegal alien is outside the Elections system.
Of course, it's possible to imagine that an illegal alien has become an Elections official or an Elections contractor or vendor, which would be a Hybrid threat--an Outsider Threat and an Insider Threat combined--but that possibility is deemed considerably less probable, and need not be dealt with in a Baseline Plan for assuring Elections Integrity, as we have here. (Addressing the Hybrid Threat would be part of an Advanced Plan for assuring Elections Integrity, but not part of a Baseline Plan.)
What about the Insider Threat? It happens that on this very day--December 8, 2021--a new article has been posted or published on the Brennan Center For Justice online, "Addressing Insider Threats in Elections", and it begins with a startling assertion:
| quote | | There is an active effort to recruit rogue election officials to sabotage elections across the country. |
|
It's credited to Lawrence Norden and Derek Tisler and Read-o-Meter's to 8 minutes "on the nose."
https://www.brennancenter.o...er-threats-elections
Elections Integrity can only be assured by an Elections Security performance that is strong in both phases of the Elections Security "game." Strong against both the Outsider Threat, like Illegal Aliens Voting. And strong against the Insider Threat, like Rogue Elections Officials. It has to be a complementary effort, or it's (pun intended) not worth the effort.
Fortunately (for this forum topic) the Brennan Center For Justice came through with this ever so timely reminder.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 12-09-2021).]
|
|
|
|