

 |
| Not until they pervert your wholesome thoughts. Robin forced to do homo pron. (Page 2/4) |
|
Jake_Dragon
|
AUG 13, 06:02 PM
|
|
Shouldn't that stay in the closet with the rest of the suit so is this a new Robin or did they just rewrite history, you know never mind I don't care. The old man is dead and the clowns have taken over.
|
|
|
FieroSTETZ
|
AUG 13, 06:50 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by sourmash:
The complaint is that he never was, but since they haven't proven that they can create a successful super hero that's a homosexual, they decided to pervert a successful one after the fact.
New America sucks. |
|
I dunno man. Someone coming out and saying "Robin is gay" hit me like someone saying "Liberace was gay". I would try to act surprised, while not actually being so. Don't worry, gay Robin won't hurt you. It's gay Flash you'd have to look out for. That guy could do some damage, and you wouldn't even see him coming 
I read up on a couple of surveys, and it looks like an average of surveys across several western cultural demographics shows roughly 7% of men and 13% of women identify as not strictly heterosexual. Given the cultural stigma of being gay, especially for men, I'm going to guess those numbers are low since a statistically significant number of people are going to lie due to cultural stigma, so they represent "at least" numbers, as in at least 7% of men and 13% of women in an aggregated group of western cultures identified as "not heterosexual". That means that if you take a group of 10 random men, one of them is probably gay. Superheroes are supposed to be "powered up" version of the everyman (everyperson?). That means, 10 random superheroes would likely include at least one identifying as not heterosexual. I don't think "gay america" is co-opting Robin, I think that they're just being more honest about the represented demographics, since they won't be crucified for doing so.
I'm not gay, but if had a gay son, for example, I think it would be nice for him to have a gay superhero to look up to. Sure, he can look up to all of them, but it'd be nice for one of them to be gay so he can relate to them. Same reason it's important to have a black superhero, or a superhero with a learning disability (and it would make an amazing movie - can you imagine an autistic superman?). The problem with making a new, gay superhero, is they'd always have "being gay" as their single biggest identifying characteristic. Taking an already gay-ish hero and having them come out means there's an established character that is also gay, instead of having a character that is gay and also is a superhero.
And since I'm already kicking the anthill... Look at a group of male superheroes. They're all incredibly well groomed, fit, and charismatic with excellent costume design. I'd go out on a limb and assume such a group of people would have a higher than statistically indicated percentage of non-heterosexual members.
To kick the ant-hill again... He-Man was pretty gay. Sure, he knew she-ra, but did you ever see he-man slaying tang? No, he was either in metal speedos hanging out with the boys and exercising, or prancing around his castle in a pink tunic with his giant cat. Fit, single guy, spends his time in speedos working out with only dudes, owns a cat, wears comfortable yet stylish pink jammies... That's pretty gay. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUQO0lUB8KY
One final kick - You know what's also super gay? Spending all your time perseverating about other people's gayness. People are gonna people. There are gay animals, there are gay people, there are probably gay aliens (gayliens?). So many deeply homophobic people come out as gay later in life that one of the gayest things you can possibly do is dislike gay people.[This message has been edited by FieroSTETZ (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
randye
|
AUG 13, 08:12 PM
|
|
THERE YOU GO AGAIN.
MORE HORSE CRAP.
Your "go-to" historical hysterical resource is A HOMOSEXUAL / SEXUAL DEVIANT PUBLICATON put out by "Pride Publishing"
Maybe instead you could provide an actual historical account of Alexander that unequivocally describes him as a homosexual or any other kind of sexual deviant.
You can start here:
The Universal History written by the Greek historian Diodoros Sikeliotes (lived c. 90 – c. 30 BC)
The Histories of Alexander the Great, written by the Roman historian Quintus Curtius Rufus (fl. c. first century AD)
The Anabasis of Alexander, written by the Greek historian Arrianos of Nikomedia (lived c. 86 – after c. 146 AD)
The Life of Alexander the Great, written by the Greek biographer and Middle Platonist philosopher Ploutarchos of Chaironeia (lived c. 46 – c. 120 AD)
The Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus, written by the Roman historian Iustinus (fl. c. second century AD), based on an earlier history written by the Roman historian Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus (fl. c. first century BC)
It's ironic how this thread started out about a character being "morphed" into a "homo hero" and POOF! here you are with a homosexual publication article trying to further the old bullshit that Alexander was a "butt pirate".
Hell the TWINK that scribbled that piece of deviant trash even lumped the Pharoh(ess) Hatshepsut into the bullshit because she is depicted with the symbolic pharonic fake beard and was called "Pharoh" which that "rump ranger" interprets wrongly as meaning "King"[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 13, 08:17 PM
|
|
|
|
randye
|
AUG 13, 08:23 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
You're an idiot. Period. |
|
I'm not the one posting links to homosexual / sexual deviant publications and making false historical claims while attempting to create fake "homo heros".
Period.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 13, 08:43 PM
|
|
Alexander the Great. "Check." Hatshepsut. "Check."
I see Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci and I wonder about those claims.
That still leaves 16 more on the list.
Can you debunk any of the remaining 16?
I only glanced at the text that accompanies the images and photographs.
You're still an idiot and the one thing that would tempt me to waste more time here would be someone else--not "randye"--asking me why I say that, and why I think it's a perfectly appropriate thing to say.
|
|
|
sourmash
|
AUG 13, 08:44 PM
|
|
Robin, a fictional super hero's sidekick, was never a homo. It has nothing to do with any percentage of actual people's behavior. You can work as hard as you want to deflect, but it wont change the case.
They destroyed the Boy Scouts by a similar subversion and now there are thousands of child molestation cases as a result of allowing homosexuals into scouting.
It's about subverting your culture just as they have previously tried and failed at successfully doing with similar and dissimilar genre's of characters. Ghostbusters with all females was a flop for a reason. They pointed their racism finger when it flopped.[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
randye
|
AUG 13, 08:57 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
I only glanced at the text that accompanies the images and photographs.
|
|
So you post historical bullshit from a HOMOSEXUAL / DEVIANT PUBLICATION.......THAT YOU DIDN'T READ
...and YOU call me an "idiot" ?
That's hilarious.
Your lack of self-awareness is absolutely stunning.
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
I see Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci and I wonder about those claims.
|
|
SINCE YOU DIDN'T BOTHER TO READ YOUR "HOMO HISTORY HOAX" ARTICLE
Let's go over THIS excerpt from it for your wondering little mind:
"Despite occasional instances of gossip and innuendo (e.g. Pietro Aretino’s suggestions of pederasty), there is no clear evidence of Michelangelo’s homosexuality or, at least, none indicating overt sexual activity," reads an entry at the university's website."
That sure didn't stop your TENACIOUS TWINK writer from going on to baselessly suggest that Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni was one of his fellow fudge-packers.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
AUG 13, 09:12 PM
|
|
| quote | [b]Originally posted by sourmash:[/b]
Robin, a fictional super hero's sidekick, was never a homo. It has nothing to do with any percentage of actual people's behavior. You can work as hard as you want to deflect, but it wont change the case.
They destroyed the Boy Scouts by a similar subversion and now there are thousands of child molestation cases as a result of allow homosexuals into scouting.
It's about subverting your culture just as they have previously tried and failed at doing with similar and dissimilar genre's of characters. Ghostbusters with all females was a flop for a reason. They pointed their racism finger when it flopped. |
|
I think this (from sourmash) includes some "truthy" observations.
When I posted that list of the "20", it was just a casual reaction, on my part, to the remark from olejoedad, when he said (in so many words) that homosexuals (let me add bisexuals, for good measure) have no one to look upon as heroes or celebrated role models. I wasn't thinking of it in a way that would be restricted to the category of fictional, fantasy or comic book-style characters. I had already said "Alan Turing" and I wanted to enlarge that one name into a list of two or more additional "candidates." Just to continue that line of thought, about it.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|
|
TheDigitalAlchemist
|
AUG 13, 09:27 PM
|
|
I’m sure they’ll make Harley Quinn and the plant babe hook up… and what about She-Ra…
 [This message has been edited by TheDigitalAlchemist (edited 08-13-2021).]
|
|

 |
|