 
     |
| Is Social Justice a disease? (Page 19/21) |
|
Jake_Dragon
|
JAN 22, 06:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 22, 08:11 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
Lots of suppositions in here, but nothing regarding redlining. That must have just been too much.
|
|
Too much?
That's hilarious.
Son you're 50 years late and not nearly enough with your redlining delusion.
Then you piddle out an article founding it's premise on a SCOTUS case from 48 YEARS AGO that the plaintiff LOST which perfectly illustrates the point against your delusion and, as if that wasn't enough, you spew a smattering of more opinion articles , which you doubtless believe to be "facts".
Do you even read and understand the excrement you quote, because It sure as hell looks like just a bunch of random, disjointed, "copy pasta" that you throw at the wall like wet spaghetti and hope it somehow sticks,....but what the hell right?, the title looked good enough....
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
You have entirely the wrong idea of my beliefs.
|
|
Nope.
You have made your racist, SJW, beliefs abundantly and disgustingly clear over and over again in this thread.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-23-2021).]
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
JAN 22, 08:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
<snip>
Even where it's not happening, those areas identified as having a "heavy concentration of negro" by the government have since been underserved. Why? It's not hard calculus. POC were corralled to certain areas for generations, and investment in infrastructure, home improvement loans, SMB loans all went to White areas. This created a huge disparity in the quality of those areas, which doesn't just go away with a new law. Poorer areas have lower housing prices. School funding is largely provided by property taxes in that area, which then feeds into how much a public school can spend on their students. How much a school spends per child, including resulting class size, have lasting effects for students.
With all of this, we know restrictive housing policies have had lasting effects on access to quality education. The two are interlinked. And access to quality education at a young age feeds into success in education in the teen years. Success in education in high school leads to better access and success in higher education, which despite increasing in cost, remains a good investment. College graduates earn 80% higher than high school graduates.
<snip>
. |
|
Except that has changed years ago. In my county more money per student goes to areas with the lowest property taxes. The poorest schools get the most money. And guess what? Those students still under perform the more affluent schools. Maybe you are assigning race to issues that are mainly cultural.
It's like Chicago calling it "gun violence" when black people shoot other black people. Maybe, just maybe, it's not the gun's fault. Maybe it's actually the person pulling the trigger's fault. And maybe, just maybe, it's cultural, not racist. But that doesn't follow the party line so disregard. Remember, if you vote trump, "you ain't black" -Uncle Joe.
|
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 26, 09:54 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
Too much?
That's hilarious.
Son you're 50 years late and not nearly enough with your redlining delusion.
Then you piddle out an article founding it's premise on a SCOTUS case from 48 YEARS AGO that the plaintiff LOST which perfectly illustrates the point against your delusion and, as if that wasn't enough, you spew a smattering of more opinion articles , which you doubtless believe to be "facts".
Do you even read and understand the excrement you quote, because It sure as hell looks like just a bunch of random, disjointed, "copy pasta" that you throw at the wall like wet spaghetti and hope it somehow sticks,....but what the hell right?, the title looked good enough....
---
Nope.
You have made your racist, SJW, beliefs abundantly and disgustingly clear over and over again in this thread.
|
|
San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez formed the decision that education was not a right outlined in the constitution. It did not say that it was not unfair, or that it didn't result in unfairness.
Do you have any actual factual disagreements with anything I posted? Or do you just disagree with me posting links further explaining how redlining is still causing issues today, while you post none for yourself?
|
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 26, 09:58 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 2.5:
This question is for anyone. Yes you 
Describe to me how one creates racial equity of outcome in a department (for example), without hiring or promoting, or firing based on race?
Then describe to me how that is not discrimination based on race. (Which is illegal)
|
|
The only way to do so would be to affect change in the community (education, crime, etc.) to create equality of opportunity, so the applicants were representative of the population.
To directly answer it, you can't. But I'd argue racial equity of outcome is the wrong target.[This message has been edited by theBDub (edited 01-26-2021).]
|
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 26, 10:10 AM
|
|
Isnt it Kamala who has a video absolutely stating equity of outcome is the goal of this movement?
Wouldn't your affirmation of the movement just be one of the hand holds for people like her to gain the greater goal that is in her video? And thusly, even though you say it's not your goal, you are one of the tools used for ultimate quotas of equal outcome?
Isnt it a common ploy to claim not supporting a goal but really just pushing the pile toward the ultimate goal?
"Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place." - Kamala Harris
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=k...me+video&t=h_&ia=web
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
JAN 26, 02:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
To directly answer it, you can't. But I'd argue racial equity of outcome is the wrong target. |
|
Absolutely it is.
Make sure you aren't supporting it.[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 01-26-2021).]
|
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JAN 26, 02:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Larryinkc
|
JAN 26, 02:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 26, 04:48 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez formed the decision that education was not a right outlined in the constitution. It did not say that it was not unfair, or that it didn't result in unfairness.
|
|
The loser in every civil lawsuit and the convicted criminal in every criminal case shouts "IT'S UNFAIR".
Coincidentally, every child that is denied what they want also shouts "IT'S UNFAIR"
Despite your gossamer thin denials, all of your arguments in this thread so far come from either your racist perspective or from your childish notion of "fairness" of outcome.
Coincidentally, both of those traits are endemic to young SJWs.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-26-2021).]
|
|
|
|
