Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Info Shows Over $1 Billion in Business Losses 1985-1994. (Page 19/20)
randye OCT 04, 05:09 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


A fine example of fake news, fake logic and the age old ploy of children.....he did this.....with no proof.

Fakery, chicanery.......liars spreading lies if there is no proof.



It isn't as though the "Noo Yawk Slimes" hasn't been caught lying about the President many times before, but the willingness of LEFTISTS to believe and regurgitate their crap time after time is bewildering.

It's either gullibility on an amazing level or it's "participatory dishonesty" or some of both.

No rational, reasonable, adult can be lied to so many times and still rely on the same source as credible.

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 10-04-2020).]

Jake_Dragon OCT 04, 05:38 PM
False accusations and half truths should be held accountable.

If you think because its in print that its the truth then perhaps a couple hours researching who Nick Sandmann is.
blackrams OCT 04, 05:41 PM


Rams
rinselberg OCT 04, 06:28 PM
"The Internal Revenue Service Is Outgunned"


quote
The agency doesn’t have the resources to battle the tax lawyers of the ultrarich. Trump’s returns are just one example of how little the wealthy pay.


Natasha Sarin for the New York Times; NYT Opinion and Editorial section; October 2, 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...come-inequality.html

"Dr. Sarin is an assistant professor at Penn Law and the Wharton School of Business."


Just for good measure.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 10-04-2020).]

Jake_Dragon OCT 04, 06:38 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

"The Internal Revenue Service Is Outgunned"

Natasha Sarin for the New York Times; NYT Opinion and Editorial section; October 2, 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...come-inequality.html

"Dr. Sarin is an assistant professor at Penn Law and the Wharton School of Business."


Just for good measure.




So fix the tax laws. There have been people in office for over 40 years. If its still an issue then why is it only an issue now for a sitting president that they disagree with?
Honest question. Because I don't think the president is responsible for tax code.
randye OCT 04, 06:46 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

"The Internal Revenue Service Is Outgunned"

" The agency doesn’t have the resources to battle the tax lawyers of the ultrarich. Trump’s returns are just one example of how little the wealthy pay."


Natasha Sarin for the New York Times; NYT Opinion and Editorial section; October 2, 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...come-inequality.html

"Dr. Sarin is an assistant professor at Penn Law and the Wharton School of Business."


Just for good measure.






Are you STILL talking about New York Slimes FAIRY TALES?

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 10-04-2020).]

williegoat OCT 04, 06:46 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

"The Internal Revenue Service Is Outgunned"

Natasha Sarin for the New York Times; NYT Opinion and Editorial section; October 2, 2020.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...come-inequality.html

"Dr. Sarin is an assistant professor at Penn Law and the Wharton School of Business."


Just for good measure.



Perhaps they should have allocated there resources a bit more wisely and judiciously.


rinselberg OCT 04, 07:22 PM

quote
Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:
So fix the tax laws. There have been people in office for over 40 years. If its still an issue then why is it only an issue now for a sitting president that they disagree with?

Honest question. Because I don't think the president is responsible for tax code.


I can't say that a Biden Harris administration strikes me as a "sure thing" in terms of improving the nation's tax codes and the functionality of the IRS.

I think there's somewhat more hope for it, vs. a second term for President Trump and Vice President Pence.

The idea that this is an issue that was just publicized the other day, by this one opinion column in the NYT--which is kind of what seems to be being expressed here--I can't imagine it being much of a chore to let all the air out of that idea. Just use an online search engine to find previous reports from bygone years like the one that I just presented.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 10-04-2020).]

olejoedad OCT 04, 07:39 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

I can't say that a Biden Harris administration strikes me as a "sure thing" in terms of improving the nation's tax codes and the functionality of the IRS.

I think there's somewhat more hope for it, vs. a second term for President Trump and Vice President Pence.

The idea that this is an issue that was just publicized the other day, by this one opinion column in the NYT--which is kind of what seems to be being expressed here--I can't imagine it being much of a chore to let all the air out of that idea. Just use an online search engine to find previous reports from bygone years like the one that I just presented.




It's a better use of time to ignore your BS posts and the drivel from the NYT.

But, you do you....it's your time to waste.

randye OCT 04, 07:51 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

......by this one opinion column in the NYT--which........




Which is speculative horse-crap, about invisible "tax returns" that are FAIRY TALES, that was written by a VERY privileged and very young woman who attended both Harvard AND Yale and doesn't actually teach law and hasn't passed her state's Bar Exam.





quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

I can't say that a Biden Harris administration strikes me as a "sure thing" in terms of improving the nation's tax codes and the functionality of the IRS.




Neither can anyone else because CONGRESS writes the tax laws.......

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 10-05-2020).]