 
     |
| 250 WHP Supernatural 3.4 Build (Page 41/47) |
|
Will
|
DEC 24, 02:28 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Raydar:
Holy crap! Is that forum still in existence? Last time I checked, it looked like a lot of dead links, and only a few recent posts.
There's a guy in AZ who has one that he is planning to push to 8K+. Lots of mods, though.
|
|
I have a billet 3" stroke crank for sale if he wants it
|
|
|
|
ericjon262
|
DEC 24, 06:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Raydar:
Holy crap! Is that forum still in existence? Last time I checked, it looked like a lot of dead links, and only a few recent posts.
|
|
it does, I'm one of only a small handful of people who still post there, facebook stripped all of the users away. Same for many of the forums that used to have a large following with hundreds of posts per day.
------------------
"I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."
"The day I tried to live, I stole a thousand beggars' change and gave it to the rich."
http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
DEC 24, 09:48 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ericjon262:
By efficiency, I'm meaning that a N* like Will's probably burns less fuel to make similar power. it probably also has a ton more room to grow compared to your 3.4
|
|
Totally agree with you!
|
|
|
|
lou_dias
|
DEC 25, 10:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by La fiera:
Totally agree with you!
|
|
I love how your engine is being compared to N*s and 3800SC's now instead of the swap that never made sense to me 3400...
|
|
|
|
ericjon262
|
DEC 25, 01:26 PM
|
|
edit:
not going to feed a troll.[This message has been edited by ericjon262 (edited 12-25-2019).]
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
DEC 25, 07:34 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Will:
A Dynojet drum has a known moment of inertia. A power source that can change that drum's RPM from X1 to X2 in Y time makes (X2^2-X1^2)/Y power. This is physics. Any tool that measures that same power source at the same rate of change of RPM and produces a different number is WRONG. There are LOT of ways a Mustang dyno can produce radically different results than a Dynojet.
|
|
Yep you are right Will but that test was Dynojet sponsored. But to get that out of the way I took my 2.8 to both dynos and look what happened.
Dynojet dyno
Mustang dyno
Exactly the same!
But like you said, I use dynos as a tool to measure my improvements not to brag.
I use the comparison with your N* as a reference of what an individual can achieve with any engine.
I know that if you make yours as radical as mine you'll be in almost at the 500WHP N/A because it has the hardware to achieve that.
Through your build I've admired the skills you have to make parts. For example, I don't have the machinery or the knowledge to
make a Quater Master clutch set fit in my engine (my dream) but I know that's beyond me, and you did it and I admire that.
So what I'm trying to say is that if you felt that I was putting you down in any way by comparing my engine to yours that was not the case.
And if you felt that way I owe you an apology, you are my best critic!
I'm looking forward to see your N* on the dragstrip and not brake more axles like me!
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
DEC 25, 09:26 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by claude dalpe:
You know La Fiera I love the way you have added so much power to an 3.4 and you have proven it many times congratulations!
The points I want to bring is: Engine reliability, not sure how many km this 3.4 will endure,
Fuel consumption = Ouff ...
Of course, your goal is not to make it an everyday car.
I made a swap in my fiero 87 with a 3.5L Pontiac G6 2005 LX9 5 speed and I have another fiero 86 with a 3.8SC automatic, both with very few modifications.
The 2 engines run like clocks with very good performance and a good fuel consumption and a very good reliability.
We have 2 different thought.
And for finish your 3.4 since you converted it to the E85 I really don't like is rough idle.
Merry christmas everybody and La fiera continues to surprise us with some new modifications on the future 3.7 L |
|
Its nice to see international fans Claude!
Fuel comsumption I don't care, its a Time Attack Racing car. More gas means more power!
Reliability, better than any stock 3.4 or any other stock GM engine at this power level because I improved things the factory missed because of budget.
The Idle roughness is not because of the E85, its because of the aggresiveness of the camshaft. Here where I live in the south they call that Lickin'!
Thanks for the support Claude![This message has been edited by La fiera (edited 12-25-2019).]
|
|
|
|
Frenchrafe
|
DEC 26, 09:51 AM
|
|
I've seen one of your videos and your car looks and sounds radical!
Very well built engine.
Like to know what wheels and tyres you are using?
Regards, Rafe
------------------
'87 Fiero GT. 3800 turbo. Sticky tyres. Driven hard!
|
|
|
|
lou_dias
|
DEC 26, 11:52 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ericjon262:
edit:
not going to feed a troll.
|
|
So you are fasting for the holidays? Best of luck!
|
|
|
|
claude dalpe
|
DEC 26, 12:26 PM
|
|
Just to clarify my point for the Idle roughness.
I said: And for finish your 3.4 since you converted it to the E85 I really don't like is rough Idle:
You replied: The Idle roughness is not because of the E85, its because of the aggresiveness of the camshaft. Here where I live in the south they call that Lickin '!
I watched the 2 videos again: https://youtu.be/qaDRamsYUtY
You are going to the dyno session and your Idle is really sweeter than on the other video: https://youtu.be/CUCOC4cxjo8
Did you change anything other than the coil pack and the E85 between the 2 videos.
In the future can you explain more your session of tuning please I'd appreciate lot's.[This message has been edited by claude dalpe (edited 12-26-2019).]
|
|
|
