 
     |
| Difference between "Judaism" and "Zionism". (Page 6/15) |
|
williegoat
|
OCT 10, 11:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
the rate is NOT for censorship as you want to do
spouting what ever you do not like is allowed
insults attacks lying is what the ratings try to control [CALL ONE AN IDIOT IS AN ATTACK]
you want an ECHO CHAMBER with only RWNJ POSTS
|
|
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/...m12/HTML/000720.html
|
|
|
|
Raydar
|
OCT 10, 02:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
OCT 10, 02:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:
I apologize for misleading some of you.
 Click to show |
|
Despite the black leather, I'm willing to bet she's Catholic. As a married man, I have tempered how I word things related to this particular topic, so I'm more careful about what I say, but I approve.
|
|
|
Patrick
|
OCT 10, 06:59 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
He was constantly rude and insulting, and revoltingly arrogant; yet the left stood behind him without question. That should be enlightening, but it doesn’t matter because he served his purpose.
|
|
Bullsh!t.
I've been labelled "left" by you and others on this forum, so I'll have to assume that I'm implicated in that comment above. There were plenty of threads initiated by fredtoast that I purposely had no involvement in. Why is it illegal to have sex with animals? was one, as I had no idea what the intent of that thread was and where it was headed. I also initially had no involvement in this particular thread, as I knew (due to the topic matter) that it would lead to nothing but false accusations and exaggerated indignation.
I only spoke up here when I discovered that Jake_Dragon had covertly requested PFF members to rate ray b... and yeah, I doubt it was to rate him positive. 
I thought we had forum rules against the solicitation of ratings.
Was it due to the giddiness of tossing a member of the "left" from the forum, that Jake_Dragon was hoping for a twofer?
As I posted previously.... not cool, Jake.
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
OCT 10, 08:26 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
I've been labelled "left" by you and others on this forum, so I'll have to assume that I'm implicated in that comment above. There were plenty of threads initiated by fredtoast that I purposely had no involvement in. Why is it illegal to have sex with animals? was one, as I had no idea what the intent of that thread was and where it was headed. |
|
Ah yes... we will always be left with this visage of Fredtoast...
Indeed Fred, indeed... why can't we have sex with animals? If Hitler could kill 20+ million Jews, certainly we should be allowed to have sex with animals. No logic more sound than that! This is certainly a question that goes through every normal healthy person's mind, right? While it's perhaps awkward at best to consider that Fred actually thought this, the more realistic explanation... or as the Millennials say, "Occam's Razor," would suggest that he did that in order to engage people like myself, Randye, and others, in some odd-twist of legal logic debate he intended to engage in. And that is the more inane aspect to this... why was that so important to him? But as I expressed to him many times... he's not reading the room, and he's saying things that are not being inferred in the manner in which he intended. Even the PFF System Bot was left speechless. This is poison, and that kind of attitude intentionally creates the same in-kind behavior from others.
EDIT: I have no doubt he'll be back. His type of personality cannot handle a character defeat, so he'll be back in less than a month... under a different name, and a different location.[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 10-10-2023).]
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
OCT 10, 09:19 PM
|
|
His "sex with animals" topic stands in sharp contrast to everything else that he posted, in the way of the topics that he started, and the discussions that he participated in.
I'd say he just "had a bad day" with that one.
That won't be how I remember him.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 10-10-2023).]
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
OCT 10, 09:35 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
MEM shouldn't have been banned.
|
|
MidEngineManiac's "only good cop is a dead cop" routine wore thin years ago when he posted as under8ted. You'd think he would've learned his lesson the first time he was banned, but no, rules didn't apply to him... or so he thought.
|
|
|
|
Jake_Dragon
|
OCT 11, 01:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
Bullsh!t.
I've been labelled "left" by you and others on this forum, so I'll have to assume that I'm implicated in that comment above. There were plenty of threads initiated by fredtoast that I purposely had no involvement in. Why is it illegal to have sex with animals? was one, as I had no idea what the intent of that thread was and where it was headed. I also initially had no involvement in this particular thread, as I knew (due to the topic matter) that it would lead to nothing but false accusations and exaggerated indignation.
I only spoke up here when I discovered that Jake_Dragon had covertly requested PFF members to rate ray b... and yeah, I doubt it was to rate him positive.
I thought we had forum rules against the solicitation of ratings.
Was it due to the giddiness of tossing a member of the "left" from the forum, that Jake_Dragon was hoping for a twofer?
As I posted previously.... not cool, Jake. |
|
Oooo I almost fooled you into rating someone, power of the boobs? I didn't realize I had such power. Perhaps I was just trying to bring someone into the light.
Patrick I could give a **** if you think I'm cool or not, but if you must.Feel free I will wait.
Don't forget Octoberfest is here!
 Click to show
|
|
|
|
Patrick
|
OCT 11, 03:39 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:
Patrick I could give a **** if you think I'm cool or not...
|
|
You think much too highly of yourself if you believe I ever thought you were "cool". Posting images of bimbos here isn't all that much to be in awe of.
| quote | Originally posted by Jake_Dragon:
Oooo I almost fooled you into rating someone, power of the boobs? I didn't realize I had such power.
|
|
It made no sense that you'd be linking to another bimbo photo at that particular time, so I clicked on EDIT of your post... and sure enough, discovered that you were hiding a link to the ratings page for ray b. What a pathetic attempt to get Ray removed from the forum... and all because you don't like what Ray says about that flimflam shyster Trump. Oh boo-hoo.
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
OCT 11, 07:13 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
His "sex with animals" topic stands in sharp contrast to everything else that he posted, in the way of the topics that he started, and the discussions that he participated in.
I'd say he just "had a bad day" with that one.
That won't be how I remember him.
|
|
And a bad day with this one?
| quote | Originally posted by fredtoast:
Now I can claim that my secret sex-slave dungeon was built for my kids. Some children are into "Harry Potter". Mine happen to love "Saw"
|
|
In response to the Harry Potter room that I built for my 14 year old daughter? There were others in the General and T/OT that I totally ignored, but he had several like that. Again, either he's F'ed in the head, or lacks inference... which I warned him about would bite him in the ass like it did JazzMan.
| quote | Originally posted by Patrick:
MidEngineManiac's "only good cop is a dead cop" routine wore thin years ago when he posted as under8ted. You'd think he would've learned his lesson the first time he was banned, but no, rules didn't apply to him... or so he thought.
|
|
Is it any worse than RayB's comments about Jews on here being responsible for everything?
The difference between people like Fred, and people like Ray and MEM... is that people like Fred are actually vile people. Ray and MEM are just goofy and set in their ways, but they're not BAD people. I don't doubt for a second that if there was a hurt Jewish person on the street that Ray would help him up, or if there was a police officer being overwhelmed, that MEM wouldn't step in to help. But I am quite sure that Fred would do neither...
|
|
|
|