Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions
  High Flow OEM Style Intake (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 4 pages long:  1   2   3   4 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
High Flow OEM Style Intake by HitesFiero
Started on: 09-14-2012 07:31 PM
Replies: 154 (9541 views)
Last post by: PatrickTRoof on 11-26-2014 12:36 AM
masospaghetti
Member
Posts: 2477
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Registered: Dec 2009


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-17-2013 08:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for masospaghettiClick Here to Email masospaghettiSend a Private Message to masospaghettiEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by sleevePAPA:


thats why he said FWD engine.




I don't understand. If you are talking about the Gen 2 aluminum heads, they flow worse than the Fiero iron heads do (hence the FWD 3.1 motor makes no more power than the Fiero 2.8). The later alumium heads won't swap onto the Fiero block without putting the compression ratio too high.
IP: Logged
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post02-17-2013 09:01 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by KurtAKX:
I'm going to begin with a disclaimer: I think the Trueleo intakes are a well thought-out and good product.

That said, I may be overstating the glaringly obvious here, but neither this dyno data nor the data provided on the Trueleo Fiero Intake site give CYLINDER TO CYLINDER flow distribution for a given delta-P, which is what Will was up HitesFiero's A55 about. Not to say it was never done, but it's not provided in this response, any of the threads covering the development of the intakes (any of them, short or long runner), nor is it on the website.

Will's concern for this may be too much - the flow distribution of many factory and aftermarket intakes is terrible- I can't imagine that HitesFieros could be substantially worse than a 1970s/1980s factory of aftermarket piece. Look no further than the Edelbrock intake base for the 2.8, in which the runners are intentionally different

To Hites- the pressure differential seen by each intake runner between atmospheric pressure and a downward moving piston (and scavenging) will most likely be pretty much the same as you state.
I think the point Will's trying to make is that the same pressure differential can exist at both ends of a sewer pipe as at both ends of a coffee stirrer, and you'll end up with radically different flow rates.


I don't think Francis T claimed to have perfect air distribution though, the OP has made claims with nothing to back them up.

------------------
we're in desperate need of a little more religion to nurse your god-like point of view...

Built not bought...

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html

IP: Logged
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post02-17-2013 09:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

ericjon262

2674 posts
Member since Jan 2010
 
quote
Originally posted by masospaghetti:


I don't understand. If you are talking about the Gen 2 aluminum heads, they flow worse than the Fiero iron heads do (hence the FWD 3.1 motor makes no more power than the Fiero 2.8). The later alumium heads won't swap onto the Fiero block without putting the compression ratio too high.


the gen 2 heads do flow better, it's the intake that is total garbage on a gen 2 motor. Gen 2 heads flow about like the small port gen 3 heads peak power isn't everything.

------------------
we're in desperate need of a little more religion to nurse your god-like point of view...

Built not bought...

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html

[This message has been edited by ericjon262 (edited 02-17-2013).]

IP: Logged
sleevePAPA
Member
Posts: 776
From:
Registered: Jan 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-17-2013 11:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for sleevePAPASend a Private Message to sleevePAPAEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by masospaghetti:


I don't understand. If you are talking about the Gen 2 aluminum heads, they flow worse than the Fiero iron heads do (hence the FWD 3.1 motor makes no more power than the Fiero 2.8). The later alumium heads won't swap onto the Fiero block without putting the compression ratio too high.


the Gen II & III engines use a larger dish in the piston due to the smaller CC. i wouldnt hang on to every word of iron head enthusiast, GEN II heads do have better flow characteristics due to the relation of the height of the port to the cylinder and the relation of the valve. GEN II heads stall the port easily because of if the increased flow and velocity from the raised port, canted valves. quench areas were also revised to help create better swirl characteristics for added atomization.
IP: Logged
Francis T
Member
Posts: 6620
From: spotsylvania va. usa
Registered: Oct 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 119
Rate this member

Report this Post02-18-2013 09:02 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Francis TClick Here to visit Francis T's HomePageClick Here to Email Francis TSend a Private Message to Francis TEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by KurtAKX:
I'm going to begin with a disclaimer: I think the Trueleo intakes are a well thought-out and good product.


That said, I may be overstating the glaringly obvious here, but neither this dyno data nor the data provided on the Trueleo Fiero Intake site give CYLINDER TO CYLINDER flow distribution for a given delta-P, which is what Will was up HitesFiero's A55 about. Not to say it was never done, but it's not provided in this response, any of the threads covering the development of the intakes (any of them, short or long runner), nor is it on the website.

To Hites- the pressure differential seen by each intake runner between atmospheric pressure and a downward moving piston (and scavenging) will most likely be pretty much the same as you state.
I think the point Will's trying to make is that the same pressure differential can exist at both ends of a sewer pipe as at both ends of a coffee stirrer, and you'll end up with radically different flow rates.


Our intakes and headers are VERY limited production items. They're intended for sale to a small market not know for deep pockets. That said, it's quite difficult to recoup R&D $$$! Considering how well our intakes work, think we went spent more than enough R&D dollars on the product. BTW: there are no glaring differences in our runners that would indicate a need for a flow differential testing. One other point, those dyno numbers were taken from one of our first prototypes, currant units have almost 10 fewer seems and thus better flow. To anyone thinking about making a product for the Fiero crowd, keep your R&D cost down.
IP: Logged
secre7skw3rl
Member
Posts: 63
From: Grafton, Ohio
Registered: Mar 2011


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-18-2013 12:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for secre7skw3rlClick Here to Email secre7skw3rlSend a Private Message to secre7skw3rlEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
OP ignore these trolls, you are doing what needs to be done around here. You already have something in hand, not playing armchair engineer. Can't wait to see the results, as everyone should be.
IP: Logged
masospaghetti
Member
Posts: 2477
From: Charlotte, NC USA
Registered: Dec 2009


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-18-2013 12:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for masospaghettiClick Here to Email masospaghettiSend a Private Message to masospaghettiEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ericjon262:


the gen 2 heads do flow better, it's the intake that is total garbage on a gen 2 motor. Gen 2 heads flow about like the small port gen 3 heads peak power isn't everything.


Why aren't Gen 2 heads a common upgrade for the Fiero 2.8 if they flow better? Do they also put the CR too high?
IP: Logged
sleevePAPA
Member
Posts: 776
From:
Registered: Jan 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-18-2013 01:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for sleevePAPASend a Private Message to sleevePAPAEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by masospaghetti:


Why aren't Gen 2 heads a common upgrade for the Fiero 2.8 if they flow better? Do they also put the CR too high?


with ample supply of GEN III heads, theres no reason to use those. yes, all of the production aluminum heads have the small CC

IP: Logged
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post02-18-2013 08:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by masospaghetti:


Why aren't Gen 2 heads a common upgrade for the Fiero 2.8 if they flow better? Do they also put the CR too high?



it's just as much work as upgrading to better Gen 3 heads so you might as well upgrade to the best.

------------------
we're in desperate need of a little more religion to nurse your god-like point of view...

Built not bought...

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html

IP: Logged
My87gt
Member
Posts: 142
From: New York, NY
Registered: Jul 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-03-2013 10:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for My87gtClick Here to visit My87gt's HomePageClick Here to Email My87gtSend a Private Message to My87gtEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Any update on this intake?
IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 13344
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 234
Rate this member

Report this Post03-03-2013 02:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillClick Here to Email WillSend a Private Message to WillEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by n7vrz:

Then make it easier on us all, Will. Design one yourself. Be sure to have it do everything exactly right in the design phase. That way no one will have to build one to test as it will be right to start with.


 
quote
Originally posted by Grantman:

Will, Remember this design?



Yes, I do. Thanks for bringing it back up.

Unfortunately I never saw dyno results for that piece.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
uhlanstan
Member
Posts: 6446
From: orlando florida
Registered: Apr 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 427
User Banned

Report this Post03-03-2013 04:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for uhlanstanClick Here to Email uhlanstanSend a Private Message to uhlanstanEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Accolades,Salut, this seems like a difficult project to complete ,I like this very much ..
do you really think 20 to 25 horsepower would be possible ??
as the cost will be high for the cheapskate Fiero owners!!So many Fiero enthusiast have cobwebs on thier
credit cards & wash thier paper plates !!
but even a $500.oo cost might be possible if the performance is there,Fierophiles might break out the skimask & pistol for a worthy project!!
the Fiero 2.8 needs more torque ,but horsepower sells
any projected date for usable model to mount on engine
this is one of the more worthy attemps I have seen for an attractive fiero part !
Im A rooting for you,,Im thinking about this with the excellent truelo exhaust
IP: Logged
lou_dias
Member
Posts: 5070
From: Warwick, RI
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post03-04-2013 01:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for lou_diasClick Here to Email lou_diasSend a Private Message to lou_diasEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Funny thing about small CC combustion chamber heads...
LS6 pistons are flat top with larger CC heads. What comes around goes around. Yep, the valves aren't splayed either...

I believe GM used dished pistons, splayed valves and smaller CC heads to keep the height of the V6/60 down and not because it was a better design. They needed to keep low profile hoods for FWD cars. All those "changes" weren't always "improvements".

[This message has been edited by lou_dias (edited 03-04-2013).]

IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20298
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (11)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 349
Rate this member

Report this Post03-04-2013 04:13 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageClick Here to Email BlacktreeSend a Private Message to BlacktreeEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by secre7skw3rl:

OP ignore these trolls, you are doing what needs to be done around here. You already have something in hand, not playing armchair engineer. Can't wait to see the results, as everyone should be.

Well said.

Also, this is supposed to be a build thread, not another "engine part fanboy" debate.
IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 13344
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 234
Rate this member

Report this Post03-05-2013 10:50 AM Click Here to See the Profile for WillClick Here to Email WillSend a Private Message to WillEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lou_dias:

Funny thing about small CC combustion chamber heads...
LS6 pistons are flat top with larger CC heads. What comes around goes around. Yep, the valves aren't splayed either...

I believe GM used dished pistons, splayed valves and smaller CC heads to keep the height of the V6/60 down and not because it was a better design. They needed to keep low profile hoods for FWD cars. All those "changes" weren't always "improvements".



BBC's have splayed valves, SBC's don't. Hemis have completely different valve and chamber geometry that's more like that of a 4 valve engine.
More than one way to skin a cat.
IP: Logged
Canyonflyer
Member
Posts: 135
From: Salt Lake City
Registered: Oct 2012


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-06-2013 10:30 PM Click Here to See the Profile for CanyonflyerSend a Private Message to CanyonflyerEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Funny thing was I was thinking last week about how difficult it would be to make a semi-stock looking 2.8/3.1/3.4 intake plenum. What do you think these will go for if/when you're ready for production?

I was going to resign myself to more medieval methods to open the stock one up. I realize there's other ones out there, but I don't want something that looks like an AT-AT sitting on my engine block.

I'll stay tuned!

------------------
Owner of:

1985 Pontiac Fiero Sport 2.5 liter 5 speed Isuzu
1986 Pontiac Fiero GT 2.8 liter 5 speed Muncie 282

IP: Logged
lou_dias
Member
Posts: 5070
From: Warwick, RI
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post03-07-2013 07:56 AM Click Here to See the Profile for lou_diasClick Here to Email lou_diasSend a Private Message to lou_diasEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Canyonflyer:
Funny thing was I was thinking last week about how difficult it would be to make a semi-stock looking 2.8/3.1/3.4 intake plenum. What do you think these will go for if/when you're ready for production?
I was going to resign myself to more medieval methods to open the stock one up. I realize there's other ones out there, but I don't want something that looks like an AT-AT sitting on my engine block.
I'll stay tuned!

I think the Trueleo looks great. If you look at the Northstar and LSx intakes, you'll notice some things. It's basically a TPI intake redesigned to be low-profile. On the Fiero V6, you have the fuel rail and injectors sitting below the main intake plenum. "Newer" low-profile designs aided by other "tweaks" have moved the fuel rail(s) and injectors so that the big tube that, for instance on a Trueleo intake, would normally sit high, now sits between the heads and the intake tubes were made to go over the top to give them the correct TPI tube-length.

This images is larger than 153600 bytes. Click to view.

The intake tubes make a J around the top of the main intake tube. What we are seeing here is a "modern" TPI intake. Since V6/60 heads have not been redesigned with relocated injector ports, we can't have "low-profile" intakes but thanks to the Fiero's rear deck height, we don't "need" them either.

[This message has been edited by lou_dias (edited 03-07-2013).]

IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 13344
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 234
Rate this member

Report this Post03-08-2013 09:19 AM Click Here to See the Profile for WillClick Here to Email WillSend a Private Message to WillEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
TPI intake runner length (plenum to valve): ~26 inches
LS runner length (plenum to valve): ~14 inches
Northstar runner length (plenum to valve): ~16 inches

Get off the TPI kick.

The V6/60 doesn't have a low-slung intake manifold because the 60 degree bank angle means there just isn't room for it in the valley. There's barely room for the cam and lifters. That's why the cam is so much higher in a V6 than it is in an SBC.
IP: Logged
lou_dias
Member
Posts: 5070
From: Warwick, RI
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post03-08-2013 09:39 AM Click Here to See the Profile for lou_diasClick Here to Email lou_diasSend a Private Message to lou_diasEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Will:

TPI intake runner length (plenum to valve): ~26 inches
LS runner length (plenum to valve): ~14 inches
Northstar runner length (plenum to valve): ~16 inches

Get off the TPI kick.

The V6/60 doesn't have a low-slung intake manifold because the 60 degree bank angle means there just isn't room for it in the valley. There's barely room for the cam and lifters. That's why the cam is so much higher in a V6 than it is in an SBC.

Wait! You mean they shortened the runners to make horsepower at a higher RPM? Color me shocked! O_o
:P

Trueleo runner length: 14 inches...

I also don't know where you are pulling 26" from because it's 17 inches:
http://www.smokinvette.com/...owthread.php?t=28356
And the LT1 is less, of course.

[This message has been edited by lou_dias (edited 03-08-2013).]

IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 13344
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 234
Rate this member

Report this Post03-08-2013 11:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for WillClick Here to Email WillSend a Private Message to WillEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Be careful where you google: http://www.hotrod.com/techa...istakes/viewall.html


Interesting that you point out the Fiero's deck lid clearance... Ferrari has extremely tall intake manifolds on their V8's; part of the reason those engines achieve phenomenal specific output. They can do that on the V8's because those engines are mid-mounted and dry-sumped. The combination of the two yields large overhead clearance.
They have to get more creative with the intake systems for the V12's because those engines have to fit in front-engine GT's under hoods that drivers have to see over.
IP: Logged
lou_dias
Member
Posts: 5070
From: Warwick, RI
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post03-08-2013 03:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lou_diasClick Here to Email lou_diasSend a Private Message to lou_diasEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Will:

Be careful where you google: http://www.hotrod.com/techa...istakes/viewall.html


Interesting that you point out the Fiero's deck lid clearance... Ferrari has extremely tall intake manifolds on their V8's; part of the reason those engines achieve phenomenal specific output. They can do that on the V8's because those engines are mid-mounted and dry-sumped. The combination of the two yields large overhead clearance.
They have to get more creative with the intake systems for the V12's because those engines have to fit in front-engine GT's under hoods that drivers have to see over.

It's like epeens Will, it all depends where you measure from.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
HitesFiero
Member
Posts: 401
From: St. Charles, MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2013 03:17 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HitesFieroClick Here to Email HitesFieroSend a Private Message to HitesFieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The prototype pieces have all been cast.
I'll have some pics to show soon.
IP: Logged
Will
Member
Posts: 13344
From: Where you least expect me
Registered: Jun 2000


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 234
Rate this member

Report this Post03-19-2013 07:29 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WillClick Here to Email WillSend a Private Message to WillEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by lou_dias:

It's like epeens Will, it all depends where you measure from.



Plenum to valve seat is the only measurement that matters...
IP: Logged
Doober
Member
Posts: 445
From: Oro Valley, AZ/Swartz Creek, MI USA
Registered: Nov 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-20-2013 12:11 AM Click Here to See the Profile for DooberSend a Private Message to DooberEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Well I'm anxious... I'm still looking into the whole L67 or turbo 3400 thing, and if this pans out for the 2.8 I may just go for a turbo 3400.
IP: Logged
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post03-20-2013 12:18 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Doober:

Well I'm anxious... I'm still looking into the whole L67 or turbo 3400 thing, and if this pans out for the 2.8 I may just go for a turbo 3400.


you don't need this for a turbo 3400.
IP: Logged
project34
Member
Posts: 2424
From: Menasha
Registered: Jan 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post04-19-2013 04:25 PM Click Here to See the Profile for project34Send a Private Message to project34Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by HitesFiero:
The prototype pieces have all been cast.
I'll have some pics to show soon.

HitesFiero, it's been one month since we last heard from you on this thread, so I hope you're OK.

Assuming you are, have you any updates to share with us regarding your intake manifold project?

IP: Logged
HitesFiero
Member
Posts: 401
From: St. Charles, MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post04-29-2013 06:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HitesFieroClick Here to Email HitesFieroSend a Private Message to HitesFieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Sorry for the lack of updates, work and family have keeping me a lot busier than normal.
I’ve been experimenting with various welding and brazing materials in an effort to find an economical way to join together the high silicon alloy pieces.
I’ve ruled out zinc brazing because the joints where just too brittle.
At this point I’ve had good results gas welding the seams with strait AL filler rod and a fluoric acid based flux.
Here’s a teaser pic;

IP: Logged
project34
Member
Posts: 2424
From: Menasha
Registered: Jan 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post04-30-2013 06:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for project34Send a Private Message to project34Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I feel not like the proverbial excited little kid in a candy store, but like an excited little kid who is watching how the candy store is being built, while anxiously awaiting the end result!


Thanks for the "teaser pic" on your cast aluminum intake manifold prototype, HitesFiero:

 
quote
Originally posted by HitesFiero:

With that photo of your developing aluminum prototype being displayed at a similar angle as was the second drawing you posted at the start of your thread, it appears to me that (except for no intake neck or lid at this early stage), the cast version nonetheless is drawing heavily from the drawn one:

 
quote
Originally posted by HitesFiero:




What I find more interesting is the striking resemblance of the "semi-pyramidal" structure pictured near the rear of the cast prototype, and a similar "semi-pyramidal" shape shown in the fifth drawing you had posted early on:

 
quote
Originally posted by HitesFiero:



Out of curiosity, is that "semi-pyramidal" structure pictured near the rear of the cast prototype (and the similar one shown in your fifth drawing) intended to promote roughly similar amounts of air reaching each of the intake manifold's six runners --- including the "rearmost" ones (i.e., those furthest from the intake manifold's neck) --- or does it have a different purpose?

Either way, please keep your updates coming, HitesFiero.



IP: Logged
lateFormula
Member
Posts: 992
From: Detroit Rock City
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post04-30-2013 09:32 PM Click Here to See the Profile for lateFormulaSend a Private Message to lateFormulaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
From looking at the pictures that looks pretty tall. Do you yet know if it will fit under a decklid without cutting up the decklid?
IP: Logged
trotterlg
Member
Posts: 1378
From: WA
Registered: Aug 2011


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post05-01-2013 12:30 AM Click Here to See the Profile for trotterlgClick Here to Email trotterlgSend a Private Message to trotterlgEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
That is a really tall box for sure, does it need to be that tall to deliver flow to that lower intake? Looks to me that half that height would still deliver twice what could be sucked down those little intakes in the lower. I know this is kind of apples and oranges, but this intake could be done up for an iron head just as easy as for my Aluminum head engine. Larry




IP: Logged
KurtAKX
Member
Posts: 4006
From: West Bloomfield, MI
Registered: Feb 2002


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 128
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2013 09:34 AM Click Here to See the Profile for KurtAKXSend a Private Message to KurtAKXEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by trotterlg:

That is a really tall box for sure, does it need to be that tall to deliver flow to that lower intake? Looks to me that half that height would still deliver twice what could be sucked down those little intakes in the lower. I know this is kind of apples and oranges, but this intake could be done up for an iron head just as easy as for my Aluminum head engine. Larry



That carburetor is turned the wrong way! You have the primaries only feeding one cylinder bank! A Quadrajet does NOT have 4-corner idle.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post05-02-2013 10:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by KurtAKX:


That carburetor is turned the wrong way! You have the primaries only feeding one cylinder bank! A Quadrajet does NOT have 4-corner idle.


!! someone else who gets it!




------------------
we're in desperate need of a little more religion to nurse your god-like point of view...

Built not bought... Because bolt-ons don't.

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html

IP: Logged
StreetRod4
Member
Posts: 177
From: NY
Registered: Apr 2011


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2013 04:08 PM Click Here to See the Profile for StreetRod4Send a Private Message to StreetRod4Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Any updates on this thing??
IP: Logged
HitesFiero
Member
Posts: 401
From: St. Charles, MO, USA
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-11-2014 07:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for HitesFieroClick Here to Email HitesFieroSend a Private Message to HitesFieroEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It's nearly finished, I just haven't had much time to invest in it lately.
IP: Logged
PatrickTRoof
Member
Posts: 547
From: Baltimore, MD, USA
Registered: May 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-13-2014 04:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickTRoofClick Here to Email PatrickTRoofSend a Private Message to PatrickTRoofEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Very exciting! I've always wanted to squeeze some more power out of my 2.8, but really wanted to keep it stock-looking. I will definitely follow the progress of this project!
IP: Logged
Doober
Member
Posts: 445
From: Oro Valley, AZ/Swartz Creek, MI USA
Registered: Nov 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-24-2014 01:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for DooberSend a Private Message to DooberEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It's good to see a reply Hites. So many times I've seen a thread where someone has posted about something that could really have potential, then it poops out because they lose interest, life happens, project goes a different way, etc. If it really has enough volume/flow potential I wouldn't mind taking a stab with one in a 3400 or 3900 project.
IP: Logged
Patrick
Member
Posts: 30164
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 443
Rate this member

Report this Post01-24-2014 01:26 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PatrickClick Here to Email PatrickSend a Private Message to PatrickEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by KurtAKX:

That carburetor is turned the wrong way! You have the primaries only feeding one cylinder bank! A Quadrajet does NOT have 4-corner idle.


 
quote
Originally posted by ericjon262:

!! someone else who gets it!


Assuming that it's an open plenum under the carb (can't imagine it isn't), I don't see a problem. What exactly is the issue?
IP: Logged
ericjon262
Member
Posts: 2674
From: everywhere.
Registered: Jan 2010


Feedback score:    (10)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 63
Rate this member

Report this Post01-24-2014 07:13 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ericjon262Send a Private Message to ericjon262Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

Assuming that it's an open plenum under the carb (can't imagine it isn't), I don't see a problem. What exactly is the issue?


the primaries are going to favor the front bank to quite a strong degree, and the secondaries are going to favor the rear bank. if this was a square bore carb (4 equal size throttles) without a progressive or vacuum secondary, it might be ok. but this a spread bore, with tiny primaries, and giant secondaries.

------------------
we're in desperate need of a little more religion to nurse your god-like point of view...

Built not bought... Because bolt-ons don't.

http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Forum2/HTML/119122.html

IP: Logged
BrittB
Member
Posts: 453
From: Keizer, OR
Registered: Dec 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-24-2014 09:44 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BrittBSend a Private Message to BrittBEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by trotterlg:

That is a really tall box for sure, does it need to be that tall to deliver flow to that lower intake? Looks to me that half that height would still deliver twice what could be sucked down those little intakes in the lower. I know this is kind of apples and oranges, but this intake could be done up for an iron head just as easy as for my Aluminum head engine. Larry






Has anyone tried this sort of idea on a 2.8? Also, would a Holley be a better choice for a plenum like this?
IP: Logged
RobertGT
Member
Posts: 101
From: Denver, CO, USA
Registered: Dec 2013


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-24-2014 11:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for RobertGTSend a Private Message to RobertGTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
That plenum is really poorly designed, and can probably be compared to the stock intake by how much less power it makes.
IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 4 pages long:  1   2   3   4 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock