SAFETY WARNING! Worn Leather Holsters Can Cause Accidental Discharges!
“What the hell was that?!?” she said. It took me a half a second to realize that my gun had just gone off…on my hip…in its holster. My wife and I had just finished breakfast at our favorite café and got into the car.
Me being the passenger, I rotated my torso to the left to fasten my seatbelt like I always do. When I straightened again, my Glock 19 discharged, blowing a 9mm hole through my pants, underwear, the leather seat and bottom of the car’s door frame.
The bullet nicked my hip, but the wound is nothing a bandage couldn’t cover. So what went wrong? Guns never go “Bang” all by themselves.
After ensuring I wasn’t hemorrhaging profusely and didn’t have to make a dash for the hospital, I stayed seated in the car as my wife came around to my door and opened it. I undid my belt and slid the Galco JAK202 Slide Belt Holster, with the gun still in it, off my belt. Why it went off was immediately apparent.
The safety on a Glock (as well as some other major brands of semiautomatics) is nonconventional and the release is incorporated into the first part of the trigger pull motion.
Nelson
quote
Originally posted by Taijiguy:
..and the safety was off why....?
IP: Logged
02:54 PM
Bullet Member
Posts: 797 From: Douglasville, GA Registered: Jul 2007
Because it's a Glock and it has no external safety. The closeup is showing how the holster defeated the trigger safety.
And this is why I'm not comfortable carrying my Glock. I like to shoot it but I don't carry it. I feel much more comfortable with one of my 1911s in condition one and so thats what I carry.
That same basic thing happened to me. Blew that ball off the side of my anklebone. Had to hobble a few miles out of the woods then drive 90 miles to the hospital.
That same basic thing happened to me. Blew that ball off the side of my anklebone. Had to hobble a few miles out of the woods then drive 90 miles to the hospital.
Ugh - that HAD to have sucked...
IP: Logged
03:26 PM
ShadowHawk Member
Posts: 376 From: Broward County, Florida Registered: May 2011
Never carry any gun, especially a glock with a round in the chamber. Unless you are in eminent danger. I have had an accidental discharge with my glock but luckily it was in a safe direction and my fault totally.
Glad you weren’t hurt to bad.
Steve
------------------ Technology is great when it works, and one big pain in the ass when it doesn't.
The safety on a Glock (as well as some other major brands of semiautomatics) is nonconventional and the release is incorporated into the first part of the trigger pull motion.
Nelson
Are you saying what I think you are? I'm totally unfamiliar with guns, but you're telling me you release the safety by PULLING THE TRIGGER?
Please don't take this the wrong way. If I ever get a pistol I'd like to know this kind of stuff...
IP: Logged
04:23 PM
PFF
System Bot
kwagner Member
Posts: 4257 From: Pittsburgh, PA Registered: Apr 2005
Never carry any gun, especially a glock with a round in the chamber. Unless you are in eminent danger.
That's the trick, though. Imminent danger usually means the time it takes you to rack the slide is too much time. I would factor in safety location/use in the gun purchase process.
IP: Logged
04:39 PM
84fiero123 Member
Posts: 29950 From: farmington, maine usa Registered: Oct 2004
That's the trick, though. Imminent danger usually means the time it takes you to rack the slide is too much time. I would factor in safety location/use in the gun purchase process.
It takes no longer to rack a round In the glock than it does to turn a safety off on any other pistol. I have practiced drawing and racking a round in. Now if I am in Boston it has a round in the chamber.
Steve
------------------ Technology is great when it works, and one big pain in the ass when it doesn't.
Detroit iron rules all the rest are just toys.
IP: Logged
04:48 PM
Doug85GT Member
Posts: 9474 From: Sacramento CA USA Registered: May 2003
Wow, fortunately that guy wasn't hurt too bad. That is the important thing. That choice of holster was not the best. From the looks of things it was too far worn to keep the gun snug. Once the gun rode up all it took was him sitting down and pushing it back down on the slack in the material. It is also a good idea to have a reinforced opening on the holster to keep the sides from closing up and pinching together like that. I carry my XD40 in a similar tuckable holster most of the time, but it is reinforced and the side of the holster covers the entire trigger guard all the way to the grip, a grip safety also makes an event like this almost impossible.
Zeb, the idea behind a trigger safety is to keep the gun from going off without a trigger pull, not so much for the user error part. One example of this is by keeping the gun from firing if it is dropped, similar to how some revolvers have a safety that will prevent them from firing if dropped or if the hammer slips without a trigger pull.
IP: Logged
05:52 PM
Boondawg Member
Posts: 38235 From: Displaced Alaskan Registered: Jun 2003
it is no less ( or more ) safe than any traditional handgun if you handle the weapon properly.
EDIT: And its not just Glock these days as other manufactures have picked up on the idea since they introduced it.
While that is true, no one can anticipate all things at all times. Prior to this gun owner posting his experience, I doubt anyone would have ever considered that their holster could fire a gun like that. There are plenty of other scenarios where the trigger can get caught on something or pulled accidentally.
I keep a round in my pistol but it has a thumb safety lever. IMO, that is a lot safer than a trigger "safety".
To each their own. If anyone likes a Glock, then get a Glock.
Originally posted by Doug85GT: While that is true, no one can anticipate all things at all times. Prior to this gun owner posting his experience, I doubt anyone would have ever considered that their holster could fire a gun like that. There are plenty of other scenarios where the trigger can get caught on something or pulled accidentally.
I keep a round in my pistol but it has a thumb safety lever. IMO, that is a lot safer than a trigger "safety".
To each their own. If anyone likes a Glock, then get a Glock.
I have to disagree about anticipation, as i know personally when i was selecting a proper holster, accidental discharge ( while wearing, presentation, or re-holstering ) was on my list of things to check out, along with comfort, retention safety ( don't want it falling out.. ). I also review my holsters every month or so and if they look the least bit questionable due to wear, they are gone. That said, a couple f my holsters fail the re-holstering 'test' while wearing, so i don't do it while I'm wearing it.
Ultimately, my safety is myself.
[This message has been edited by Nurb432 (edited 05-31-2011).]
IP: Logged
06:35 PM
PFF
System Bot
kwagner Member
Posts: 4257 From: Pittsburgh, PA Registered: Apr 2005
It takes no longer to rack a round In the glock than it does to turn a safety off on any other pistol. I have practiced drawing and racking a round in.
Racking can be fast for sure, and the more practice the better. I would argue though the distance of motion and the need for two hands makes it very difficult for it to be as fast as turning off a thumb safety.
quote
Originally posted by 84fiero123:
Now if I am in Boston it has a round in the chamber.
No argument there
IP: Logged
06:39 PM
jimbolaya Member
Posts: 10652 From: Virginia Beach, Virginia Registered: Feb 2007
Are you saying what I think you are? I'm totally unfamiliar with guns, but you're telling me you release the safety by PULLING THE TRIGGER?
Please don't take this the wrong way. If I ever get a pistol I'd like to know this kind of stuff...
Correct. There are many "safety" devices on a Glock, but none of them are designed to prevent the trigger from being pulled like a typical safety on a semi-auto pistol. The safety devices are to prevent a negligent discharge in the event the weapon is dropped, or hit, etc. But if something pulls back on the trigger - it's going off, if a round has been chambered.
Revolvers also have no safety to prevent the trigger from being pulled, but the trigger pull on a typical revolver requires much more force and a longer pull.
Any gun when handled properly is safe. Of course, all that means is by definition if something unsafe happens, it's just because you were mishandling it. Not very helpful. A Glock is "easier" to mishandle by accident than other types of semi-auto pistols, IMO.
Holding a lit match in one hand and an open bucket of gasoline in the other is also perfectly safe when handled properly, but I'd prefer to carry the gasoline in a closed container with the matches not lit. Which method do you think is easier to handle properly?
IP: Logged
06:43 PM
jimbolaya Member
Posts: 10652 From: Virginia Beach, Virginia Registered: Feb 2007
Now on topic. This was not the guns fault, it was not the holsters fault. It was the gun owners fault. Glock or no Glock, he failed to use a holster that 1. was not in good shape, and 2. not appropriate for the gun. If he was using a Blackhawk Tatical, or replaced this obviously worn out holster, OR JUST PLAIN FREAKIN PAID ATTENTION WHEN HOLSTERING THE WEAPON, this would not have happened.
Jim
[This message has been edited by jimbolaya (edited 05-31-2011).]
IP: Logged
06:47 PM
Boondawg Member
Posts: 38235 From: Displaced Alaskan Registered: Jun 2003
No on topic. This was not the guns fault, it was not the holsters fault. It was the gun owners fault. Glock or no Glock, he failed to use a holster that 1. was not in good shape, and 2. not appropriate for the gun. If he was using a Blackhawk Tatical, or replaced this obviously worn out holster, OR JUST PLAIN FREAKIN PAID ATTENTION WHEN HOLSTERING THE WEAPON, this would not have happened.
Jim
Yup
IP: Logged
06:53 PM
jimbolaya Member
Posts: 10652 From: Virginia Beach, Virginia Registered: Feb 2007
A Glock is "easier" to mishandle by accident than other types of semi-auto pistols, IMO.
Ill give you that one and totally agree, and in the case of the topic, he didn't take that extra step in care that is required if you own one ( or sometime similar ).
IP: Logged
07:01 PM
tmur115 Member
Posts: 888 From: Battle Ground WA Registered: Jan 2006
Originally posted by Zeb: Are you saying what I think you are? I'm totally unfamiliar with guns, but you're telling me you release the safety by PULLING THE TRIGGER? Please don't take this the wrong way. If I ever get a pistol I'd like to know this kind of stuff...
if you ever get a pistol....
1 please get safety lessons... 2 eye protection 3 hearing protection 4 more safety lessons... 5 range time would not hurt
... he failed to use a holster that 1. was not in good shape, and 2. not appropriate for the gun...
^ That's my stance. Most holsters like that are so cheap that it doesn't make sense to risk it. When it gets sloppy toss it and pick up a new one, Amazon has a ton of nice holsters at really good prices btw. I am a firm believer in keeping your booger hook off the bang switch, but in this case it's keep the worn out holster off the bang switch
[This message has been edited by mikejhjr (edited 05-31-2011).]
1 please get safety lessons... 2 eye protection 3 hearing protection 4 more safety lessons... 5 range time would not hurt
DAO revolvers are a good start for a beginner....
=todd=
I would add a #6.. a class on YOUR specific gun: How to take it apart, how to clean it, a thorough understanding of it and its parts and function, not just generic safety lessons.
And this is why I'm not comfortable carrying my Glock. I like to shoot it but I don't carry it. I feel much more comfortable with one of my 1911s in condition one and so thats what I carry.
If you like it enough and want to carry it, there are manual safeties you can get .. just as a side note.
IP: Logged
08:01 PM
Racing_Master Member
Posts: 1460 From: Hooksett, NH, USA Registered: Nov 2007
Yea, I'm not to fond of Glocks myself. I carry my Springfield XD .45 It would make it very hard for the XD's to do this being they have 2 saftys grip safety and trigger. But I guess it is all personal prefrances like all of us driving our fieros over ricers lol
its completely safe to carry a Glock Chambered. Like anything else, this a case of neglect. That was a poor choice of holster for this weapon, and one should inspect the holster they choose to use with a safe action pistol. As an officer, you are taught never go anywhere half cocked. If you are carrying a weapon it should always be ready to go bang with a trigger pull. If you are serious about self defense, never carry a weapon with the safety on and never carry a weapon with a round not chambered. You can, but it would be unwise, as this would greatly put you at a disadvantage. Glocks are combat pistols that require an experienced operator to handle and be confident with. In my opinion, if you lack the confidence to carry a weapon on fire with a round chambered, and must have a safety or no round chambered to feel comfortable, perhaps you should rethink carrying a weapon at all. Always use a safe and proper holster. The one in this pic is cut way short of the trigger housing and should never have had that kind of ability in motion to get in there.
This is what the person who AD said "This truly brings home the importance of taking care of your equipment and ensuring it’s in proper working order. Hopefully you can learn from my situation and prevent an accident like this from happening to you."
Exactly.
Don't spend hundreds on a weapon, and then go cheap on a holster.
[This message has been edited by NickD3.4 (edited 05-31-2011).]
IP: Logged
08:48 PM
Rainman Member
Posts: 3877 From: Cincinnati, Ohio Registered: Jan 2003
That is 100% user fault. That guy was just asking for it with that holster.
I disagree with some of the remarks about safety, etc. I carry and M&P with no thumb-safety, just the trigger safety. I don't want anything getting in the way if a situation occurred that I needed it to fire. A solid holster and everything is just fine. Its safer in a holster than out.
On the rackin a round vs flipping off the saftey... If you have a weapon with a manual safety (I have a Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact), with practice, you can disengage that safety as your hand slides down onto the weapon to pull it out of it's holster. You can take the best of the best and i'll bet I can turn off my safety, unholster and fire a round before someone can unholster, rack a round and then fire.
I would never carry a firearm (for protection or on duty) without a round chambered.
IP: Logged
08:53 PM
Racing_Master Member
Posts: 1460 From: Hooksett, NH, USA Registered: Nov 2007
its completely safe to carry a Glock Chambered. Like anything else, this a case of neglect. That was a poor choice of holster for this weapon, and one should inspect the holster they choose to use with a safe action pistol. As an officer, you are taught never go anywhere half cocked. If you are carrying a weapon it should always be ready to go bang with a trigger pull. If you are serious about self defense, never carry a weapon with the safety on and never carry a weapon with a round not chambered. You can, but it would be unwise, as this would greatly put you at a disadvantage. Glocks are combat pistols that require an experienced operator to handle and be confident with. In my opinion, if you lack the confidence to carry a weapon on fire with a round chambered, and must have a safety or no round chambered to feel comfortable, perhaps you should rethink carrying a weapon at all. Always use a safe and proper holster. The one in this pic is cut way short of the trigger housing and should never have had that kind of ability in motion to get in their.
I am only doubting the M1911 to carry "Cocked and locked" because I heared the grip safety can fail... that and a .45 cal round might not feel good at close range. I hear its safe, so I plan on getting one. I just might only carry it loaded and ready to go when I feel where I am going is unsafe. if I am just going to a friends house or just somewhere that there is slim to no possibility of encountering a bad situation I would have the barrel loaded but the hammer down, so it cant go boom.
On the rackin a round vs flipping off the saftey... If you have a weapon with a manual safety (I have a Beretta PX4 Storm Subcompact), with practice, you can disengage that safety as your hand slides down onto the weapon to pull it out of it's holster. You can take the best of the best and i'll bet I can turn off my safety, unholster and fire a round before someone can unholster, rack a round and then fire.
I would never carry a firearm (for protection or on duty) without a round chambered.
thats you choice if you want to carry a weapon with the safety on, but I would highly advise against it.