|
Can we have Florida instead ? (Page 1/2) |
|
MidEngineManiac
|
FEB 14, 11:02 AM
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 14, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 14, 01:06 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
You can have Minnesota. |
|
|
|
|
RWDPLZ
|
FEB 14, 02:23 PM
|
|
Montana is worth keeping. You guys can have New York. We can also sweeten the deal with Minnesota, North Dakota (oil!), New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts...
|
|
|
Blacktree
|
FEB 14, 02:42 PM
|
|
No, you cannot have Florida.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 14, 02:51 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by RWDPLZ:
Montana is worth keeping. You guys can have New York. We can also sweeten the deal with Minnesota, North Dakota (oil!), New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts... |
|
And california, you are very welcome to it, as a bonus.
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
FEB 14, 02:56 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
And california, you are very welcome to it, as a bonus. |
|
There IS a reason we ship people like Justin Bieber there. HELL NO, we need a dumping ground too !!
|
|
|
RWDPLZ
|
FEB 14, 03:48 PM
|
|
Replace Scotland and Scots with California and Californians.
|
|
|
Zeb
|
FEB 16, 05:55 PM
|
|
Hey! We could sell New Jersey, to Canada too, and....
Ah, hell. They're smarter than that.
|
|
|
RWDPLZ
|
FEB 16, 06:05 PM
|
|
No, New Jersey has the worst drivers, but the best Italian food.
|
|
|
|