Sometime ago I did a more scientific calculation with real dyno data as follows (no tranny specified so I guess is a mix).
I went to this site(http://www.etrackmasters.com/modules.php?name=Dyno_Charts) and took average HP #s for 2.8 and 3.4 engines and calculated drive-train losses using stock HP numbers for those engines (2.8: 138hp/165tq, I used 138 instead of 135 or 140) (3.4: 160hp/200tq). Dividing rear wheel HP by those gave me almost identical losses for HP and TQ as shown below which was expected. You can use these to estimate your engines crank output;
Engine-----HP------------TQ
2.8---------109.5---------144.8 Average HP/TQ
--------------0.79---------0.87 RWHP-TQ/Engine #s (Ex: 109.5/138)
--------------0.21---------0.12 Calculated loss (RWHP/Spec HP, using 138HP & 165TQ)
Engine-----HP------------TQ
3.4---------127.5--------175.3 Average HP/TQ
-------------0.796---------0.87 rwhp/Spec-tq
-------------0.20---------0.12 Calculated loss (RWHP/Spec HP, using 160HP & 200TQ)
------------------
Palm Beach Fieros
http://pbfieros.tripod.com