Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions - Archive
  underdrive pulleys?

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


underdrive pulleys? by quikSIX
Started on: 01-05-2005 04:49 AM
Replies: 11
Last post by: Oreif on 01-06-2005 01:52 AM
quikSIX
Member
Posts: 174
From: shawnee,kansas
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 04:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for quikSIXSend a Private Message to quikSIXDirect Link to This Post
i was thinking of getting some underdrive pulleys for my 86 3.1 and was just wondering if it causes any problems?

thanks

------------------
86-2m6

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
fierobrian
Member
Posts: 2976
From: aurora il 60505
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 80
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 04:53 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierobrianSend a Private Message to fierobrianDirect Link to This Post
i have a set on my 86 se v-6 . if your alt. is good they work great . my alt was allmost 20 years old so i put a cs-130 on and i love the under drive pully . i can really tell the differnce
IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29569
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 08:39 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierobrian:
i have a set on my 86 se v-6 . if your alt. is good they work great . my alt was allmost 20 years old so i put a cs-130 on and i love the under drive pully . i can really tell the differnce

yup - me too. got the pulley, made my old alternator almost useless, got the CS-130, now its great.

------------------
1985 Fiero SE - Plain Red V6 Coupe
3.1 Crane 272 MSD 4.10-4spd

IP: Logged
roys88fiero
Member
Posts: 1042
From: Tucson,AZ
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 11:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for roys88fieroClick Here to visit roys88fiero's HomePageSend a Private Message to roys88fieroDirect Link to This Post
So is the CS-130 a better alt, or is it just a replacement alt for the stock fiero alt?
-Roy

------------------
Real Sports cars only have 2 seats....

Matching numbers GT
#17889 of 26,402 made in 1988, 1of 241 yellow GT's

IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29569
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 12:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by roys88fiero:
So is the CS-130 a better alt, or is it just a replacement alt for the stock fiero alt?
-Roy

it is a better alternator. it is stock in an 88. with MINOR work - cutting off old plug, putting on new plug - it is a direct swap for 84-87

IP: Logged
AaronZ34
Member
Posts: 2322
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Registered: Oct 2004


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 408
User Banned

Report this Post01-05-2005 01:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for AaronZ34Click Here to visit AaronZ34's HomePageSend a Private Message to AaronZ34Direct Link to This Post
I would not use one on a 3.4L DOHC swap whent he battery is in the front. Although it does minimize output losses, it still is less. And with the 3.4L's charging system being as bad as it is, this combined with a front mount battery makes it really bad. I turn on my headlights, and my car almost stalls.

But we did get almost 8 horsepower to the wheels, and I've seen them go higher. Plus they normally weigh less, since they are aluminum. I'd say go for it, especially if a 2.8L's charging system is good.

------------------
1992 Lumina Z34 5-speed For Sale, modified(high 13s), or stock
14.78 @ 92.68

1992 Lumina Z34 5-speed
Stock, takes my butt to work...Sometimes...

3.4L TDC V6, getting built to about 430hp at 8000rpm for a 88GT

IP: Logged
4.9 PFI FIERO
Member
Posts: 189
From: new orleans louisiana
Registered: Jul 2004


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 04:27 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 4.9 PFI FIEROSend a Private Message to 4.9 PFI FIERODirect Link to This Post
i doubt the battery location would make a diffrence on a 3.4 DOHC my friend has a 3.4 DOHC fiero (Exotic Rida) he had it in the back moved it up front and hooked up some 1/0 guage wire with an optima battery and it charges better... go figure

he is getting the pulleys too

IP: Logged
jstricker
Member
Posts: 12956
From: Russell, KS USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score:    (11)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 370
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 06:48 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jstrickerSend a Private Message to jstrickerDirect Link to This Post
Interesting Article on underdrive pulleys and actual dyno test results.

Cliff Notes version, dynoing a car (twin cam Saturn) first with the stock pulleys and all accesories driven, then immediately after with no belt on the engine at all. Showed a massive 3 hp increase. The test was repeatable and corresponded with tests on a BMW.

If you have a reason to do it other than a performance increase, fine, if you're looking for HP, look elsewhere.

John Stricker

IP: Logged
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 08:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jstricker:

Interesting Article on underdrive pulleys and actual dyno test results.

Cliff Notes version, dynoing a car (twin cam Saturn) first with the stock pulleys and all accesories driven, then immediately after with no belt on the engine at all. Showed a massive 3 hp increase. The test was repeatable and corresponded with tests on a BMW.

If you have a reason to do it other than a performance increase, fine, if you're looking for HP, look elsewhere.

John Stricker

It all matters in the pulley design and the engine. Different engines react differently to changes. In the article they do mention that the "pulley" is part of the harmonic balancer.
Reducing this weight can damage the crank. (and per the article, several BMW's did in fact have crank damage.) The thing about removing the belt is flawed since most performance underdrive pulley's are smaller AND lighter which reduces the inertia.
A smaller and lighter pulley will have the same effect as using lighter wheels. The Fiero belt is only driving the waterpump and alternator, Not a power steering pump, tensioner pulley, and A/C and possible another guide pulley, All with a long belt. The Fiero also differs as the balancer and pulley are seperate parts unlike the Saturn and BMW engines in the article.

Here is a website that has dyno's from a Mustang with the 3.8L V-6 with a 7.8hp increase.
http://www.diaboliqueracing.com/pageasppulley.html

And since were talking about using underdrive pulley's on GM 60* V-6's, Here is a place that sells them AND has Dyno'd them on a few 60* V-6 engines including the 3.4TDC and they are seeing 8-10hp gains on the dyno at the high end:
http://www.fastfwdperformance.com/uddyno.htm

The fast fwd performance website is very informative on underdrive pulleys on 2.8L, 3.1L, and 3.4/3400 engines.

Here are the pulley's they make:
http://www.fastfwdperformance.com/ud.htm

[This message has been edited by Oreif (edited 01-05-2005).]

IP: Logged
jstricker
Member
Posts: 12956
From: Russell, KS USA
Registered: Apr 2002


Feedback score:    (11)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 370
Rate this member

Report this Post01-05-2005 11:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for jstrickerSend a Private Message to jstrickerDirect Link to This Post
Oreif,

Lest we forget, BOTH of these places are trying to sell the things.

I have the FS underdrive pulley, the weight difference between it and stock is virtually nil. There might be a few ounces, I didn't weigh them, but the FS one is simply stamped steel just like stock and not aluminum or some other lightweight metal. I'll grant that if the pulley was significantly lighter, you might feel the difference in how the engine revved, but that doesn't necessarily equate to more hp.

The pulley on the 2.8 isn't part of the dampner, so that's a moot point in this discussion which is how much benefit can be derived from underdrive pulleys on the 2.8 in the Fiero?

Well, first you have to determine how much is being used. If the battery is fully charged and there aren't a lot of accesories to load the electrical system, the alternator is drawing very little hp from the engine. It's not quite just an idler, but darn close. If you're at the strip, you can MAKE it an idler just by unplugging it. The water pump draws horsepower in proportion to rpm. I have no idea on what the power required curve for that is, but it won't be linear, it will increase at a higher rate at higher rpm. The question is, how much and how much difference can you have by slowing it down and still maintain adequate cooling at lower rpms.

My experience is, not much.

From your first site, with the dyno results, on the first two they claim a 7-8 hp increase at the wheels. Maybe so, I don't know what all accessories those belts are driving. I know what the Fiero's is driving, though, and it's not much. On the last dyno sheet on that site, they don't even have a "before" sheet, only an "after". On that they guessed at what the stock power was, and then they go on to say that a cat-back exhaust is worth 2-3 hp and an air intake (what that is, nobody knows) is worth 2-3 so THEREFORE their pulley must be worth 11hp? Not exactly empirical proof, IMHO.

On the FastForward site, I tried to find how small the pulleys were, they look smaller than the FS pulleys, but it's hard to tell. The Beretta also has a completely different belt system than the Fiero. Again, these guys are selling their stuff, to me that alone makes their tests at least something to look at with a jaded eye.

The Fiero drives two things that are under load. Water pump that's a fixed load and alternator that you can control by unplugging if you want, at the track. That's it. The point is, there's not much power that's being consumed there and therefore, not much that can be recovered by slowing it down.

I don't think we really have an argument here. UD pulleys can help as much as some claim, on some engines, I just don't see how the Fiero applications in the pushrod V6's are one of them.

John Stricker

 
quote
Originally posted by Oreif:


It all matters in the pulley design and the engine. Different engines react differently to changes. In the article they do mention that the "pulley" is part of the harmonic balancer.
Reducing this weight can damage the crank. (and per the article, several BMW's did in fact have crank damage.) The thing about removing the belt is flawed since most performance underdrive pulley's are smaller AND lighter which reduces the inertia.
A smaller and lighter pulley will have the same effect as using lighter wheels. The Fiero belt is only driving the waterpump and alternator, Not a power steering pump, tensioner pulley, and A/C and possible another guide pulley, All with a long belt. The Fiero also differs as the balancer and pulley are seperate parts unlike the Saturn and BMW engines in the article.

Here is a website that has dyno's from a Mustang with the 3.8L V-6 with a 7.8hp increase.
http://www.diaboliqueracing.com/pageasppulley.html

And since were talking about using underdrive pulley's on GM 60* V-6's, Here is a place that sells them AND has Dyno'd them on a few 60* V-6 engines including the 3.4TDC and they are seeing 8-10hp gains on the dyno at the high end:
http://www.fastfwdperformance.com/uddyno.htm

The fast fwd performance website is very informative on underdrive pulleys on 2.8L, 3.1L, and 3.4/3400 engines.

Here are the pulley's they make:
http://www.fastfwdperformance.com/ud.htm

IP: Logged
fierobrian
Member
Posts: 2976
From: aurora il 60505
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 80
Rate this member

Report this Post01-06-2005 12:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierobrianSend a Private Message to fierobrianDirect Link to This Post
i love mine and i can tell a differnce i changed just that . and before i could do a slight burn out and now i can smoke the tire all day WITH MY STICKSHIFT. if some has one they don't want let mew know i saving to get one for my other fiero as we speak. i can only tell you want i know .i do not have a dnyo but there is a differnce and i have done more thing and haven't seen a differnce as much
k/n aif filter
msd coil
NGK PLUG
ACCEL CAP AND ROTOR
ported upper intake and throotle body

i biggest gain i felt was with the under drive pullys don't know whose pully i got i bought used i think fierostore's
JUST WHAT I HAVE FELT .

[This message has been edited by fierobrian (edited 01-06-2005).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Oreif
Member
Posts: 16460
From: Schaumburg, IL
Registered: Jan 2000


Feedback score:    (19)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post01-06-2005 01:52 AM Click Here to See the Profile for OreifClick Here to visit Oreif's HomePageSend a Private Message to OreifDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by jstricker:

I don't think we really have an argument here. UD pulleys can help as much as some claim, on some engines, I just don't see how the Fiero applications in the pushrod V6's are one of them.

John Stricker


I was just offering a different viewpoint. I don't think that both websites I posted "forged" or "massaged" their dyno's.
But one aspect that hasn't been mentioned is where the pulley's gains are. If you look at the Baretta dyno you'll notice that up to 3300rpm there is no gains. But between 3300 and 4800 the power pulley has a wider flatter power band. Giving the engine a higher average horsepower.
By 4800 there is a 10hp difference. Even though the "peak" horsepower is only 5hp, the power curve is much better with the UD pulley.
It is this wider, flatter power curve that gives the high end "pulling" feel that many get when they install one.
The website you posted doesn't show the actual dyno graph, But I would bet the power curve changed as well.

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock