 
     |
| Global climate change fires? (Page 3/4) |
|
cvxjet
|
SEP 16, 11:58 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Lambo nut:
You don't happen to wear a vagina (aka pussy) hat do you? |
|
I Enjoy wearing them and yet I don't judge gay boys like you...Go play with your boyfriend who you hero-whoreship......
You just do what the Oil industry tells you and tell your grandchildren you don't give an "F" about their future....Why do you like to crap all over the world that God gave us? Next you'll be crapping in your church......
Willie.....SHould we eliminate all plant life? CA has millions of square mile of forest- Why don't you come here and start cleaning the forest- after you have done 1000 square miles I will start helping you.
Question; Why have we NEVER had so many and such bad fires in the history of the west?[This message has been edited by cvxjet (edited 09-16-2020).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
SEP 16, 12:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cvxjet:
Willie.....SHould we eliminate all plant life?
|
|
Of course not, that would just be ridiculous. Plant life provides us with food, shelter and clean air.
| quote |
CA has millions of square mile of forest- Why don't you come here and start cleaning the forest- after you have done 1000 square miles I will start helping you.
|
|
I already spent 18 years working for Weyerhaeuser Co, a pioneer in forest management and stewardship. Now it is your turn to do your part. Change the laws in your state. Elect representatives who care more about the environment than votes.
| quote |
Question; Why have we NEVER had so many and such bad fires in the history of the west?
|
|
Because environmental buffoonery has prevented companies such as Weyerhaeuser, Georgia Pacific and Boise Cascade from effectively managing our forests.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 16, 12:35 PM
|
|
The SacBee (Sacramento Bee) has some impressive looking investigative-style reporting on this topic, and registration (with the SacBee) is free.
Why California spends billions but can’t control its wildfires. ‘No simple or cheap solution’
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy
Fact check: Trump downplays climate change, says California must thin forests. What he got wrong
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 09-16-2020).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
SEP 16, 12:37 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
The Sacramento Bee has some impressive lookire |
|
Is Joe Biden writing your copy now?
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
SEP 16, 12:49 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
The SacBee (Sacramento Bee) has some impressive looking investigative-style reporting on this topic, and registration (with the SacBee) is free.
Why California spends billions but can’t control its wildfires. ‘No simple or cheap solution’
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy
Fact check: Trump downplays climate change, says California must thin forests. What he got wrong
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy
|
|
The image I posted above is undeniable proof that thinning the forest can slow the spread of, and mitigate the damage from wildfires. Trump is right, again.
Lumber companies can thin the forests, protecting the environment and making a profit at the same time. It is a win/win. Environmental Capitalism, how about that?
|
|
|
|
Lambo nut
|
SEP 16, 12:49 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cvxjet:
I Enjoy wearing them and yet I don't judge gay boys like you...Go play with your boyfriend who you hero-whoreship......
|
|
Kind of figured. Now I can only guess you are in about 4th or 5th grade too?
Have fun with your hissy fit. It's the type of drama I enjoy here.
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
SEP 16, 12:56 PM
|
|
Did you know:
Most of the US used to be under water?
There was an Ice Age?
Climates change.
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
SEP 16, 12:58 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 2.5:
Did you know:
Most of the US used to be under water?
There was an Ice Age?
Climates change.
|
|
Then Trump came along and ruined all that.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
SEP 16, 01:09 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
The image I posted above is undeniable proof that thinning the forest can slow the spread of, and mitigate the damage from wildfires. Trump is right, again. Lumber companies can thin the forests, protecting the environment and making a profit at the same time. It is a win/win. Environmental Capitalism, how about that. |
|
Fact check: Trump downplays climate change, says California must thin forests. What he got wrong
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy
The other report that I posted is a long one, but this one right here is a "shorty."
It doesn't say that there shouldn't be more aggressive and widespread wildfire mitigation practices, including forest thinning (possibly for lumber) and controlled burns.
It says "But..."
?[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 09-16-2020).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
SEP 16, 01:22 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
Fact check: Trump downplays climate change, says California must thin forests. What he got wrong
Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news...5.html#storylink=cpy
The other report that I posted is a long one, but this one right here is a "shorty."
It doesn't say that there shouldn't be more aggressive and widespread wildfire mitigation practices, including forest thinning (possibly for lumber) and controlled burns.
It says "But..."
?
|
|
Your article starts by blaming the feds for not doing enough, then goes on to say that Governor Newsom has now agreed to allow the feds to double their mitigation effort. Those two ideas contradict each other.
What it means is that California and the Obama administration did not do enough to manage the forest, but Trump has now convinced California to accept responsibility and undertake an enlightened approach to environmental stewardship.
|
|
|
