 
     |
| 250 WHP Supernatural 3.4 Build (Page 32/47) |
|
lou_dias
|
MAY 19, 06:25 PM
|
|
But but but but but but but but but but but didn't the trolls tell you IRON HEADS DON'T FLOW!
LMFAO!
For the love of god don't use a Dynojet dyno or the trolls will really poop their panties!
Congrats Rei !!!
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 19, 10:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 19, 10:58 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by lou_dias:
But but but but but but but but but but but didn't the trolls tell you IRON HEADS DON'T FLOW!
LMFAO!
For the love of god don't use a Dynojet dyno or the trolls will really poop their panties!
Congrats Rei !!! |
|
Thank you Lou!
I quoted Dennis not to put him down or anything like that.
I did it just to show that we should think before we speak.
I set a goal for myself and limited myself to iron heads.
It took me a year or so but I did not give up. I had comitted myself in public to this challenge
and I read, researched, brainstormed and analized a lot of things that suppousebly didn't make sense
scientifically or mathematically but suddenly made sense when applicable at different parameters.
These things made sense to a down to earth person, like the average guys like you and I, but for
the intelligent scientists-like thinking people it was just impossible because science and math said so.
And that when I said screw science and math, I'm going with my gut! There you have it!
You and I have heard thousands of times that "iron heads don't flow".
But why don't they flow?
because mathematically they don't?
Is it because there is a replacement aluminum head that outflow the iron head?
No, its because no one has ever taken the time and effort to disproof this theory.
The internet made a lot of individuals inteligent but the reality is that it made them dumb.
But dumb how? Well, dumb in the sense that they are repeating what other people said and
they never trully had taken the time to proof otherwise.
So, I can say that Lou was right on the iron head theory. They flow, as much and even more
than the aluminum couterparts when done properly.
One more thing, you dont need a roller cam to make power! Sorry Lou. 
|
|
|
|
lou_dias
|
MAY 20, 07:47 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by La fiera:
One more thing, you dont need a roller cam to make power! Sorry Lou. |
|
That's it! Now we are fighting! ;-)
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 20, 11:33 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Spadesluck
|
MAY 21, 12:47 AM
|
|
That does sound mean. Seems to rev up fast as well. Now throw a turbo in it!  [This message has been edited by Spadesluck (edited 05-21-2019).]
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 21, 10:32 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Spadesluck:
That does sound mean. Seems to rev up fast as well. Now throw a turbo in it!
|
|
That would be too easy!!
I've got some other prototype stuff that I'm working on for the other engine which I'll be testing on this one. It'll be awesome if I hit the 300+whp! 
|
|
|
|
lou_dias
|
MAY 21, 04:25 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by La fiera:
It'll be awesome if I hit the 300+whp!
|
|
Just find a Dynojet dyno instead of a Mustang dyno...
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 21, 09:56 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by lou_dias:
Just find a Dynojet dyno instead of a Mustang dyno... |
|
Nah, I want to make the haters suffer so I'll keep the Mustang!
In another note, the peak numbers were good for me but what really impressed me was the area under the curve power gained
at this last tuning session compared to one before this one when I posted the 245whp dyno sheet.
Look at this hand made page,
left column is dyno before this one, the middle column is this dyno session and the last column is the gain from the first one to this last session.
This I can really feel on the seat of my pants!
|
|
|
|
La fiera
|
MAY 23, 07:06 PM
|
|
This are the valves in this motor. I don't think I showed them before but I found this picture.
The two outer are the stock 1.72int and 1.42exh and in the middle the Chromoly 1.8int and 1.5exh.
|
|
|
