My 4th Fiero, My first 2.8 V6. I have A LOT of questions (Page 3/6)
dremu MAR 30, 01:16 PM
Ppl/wht + tan is indeed the cold start injector.

Another thought on the start-stop-won't-start-again-for-a-while is the ignition module inside the distributor. IIRC the 4-bangers are entirely different in this regard, but the V6 is famous for issues with these. I'd pop the cover off the dizzy, unscrew the module, clean and apply new silicone heatsink grease from your local computer store, then careful tighten again. Also make sure its connector (connectors? I forget if they're combined) are nice and tight. If any of the above shifts due to thermal stress you won't get spark. Many owners carry a spare module, and recommend the Delco branded replacement vs. random house brand.

-- A
Curlrup MAR 30, 01:53 PM

quote
Originally posted by dremu:

Ppl/wht + tan is indeed the cold start injector.

Another thought on the start-stop-won't-start-again-for-a-while is the ignition module inside the distributor. IIRC the 4-bangers are entirely different in this regard, but the V6 is famous for issues with these. I'd pop the cover off the dizzy, unscrew the module, clean and apply new silicone heatsink grease from your local computer store, then careful tighten again. Also make sure its connector (connectors? I forget if they're combined) are nice and tight. If any of the above shifts due to thermal stress you won't get spark. Many owners carry a spare module, and recommend the Delco branded replacement vs. random house brand.

-- A



That was next on my list. Spare ignition module. I ALWAYS keep a spare with. On a non distributor Iron Duke I can change them out by feel. Done it a few times, in the rain, and the dark, on the side of the road across the two 88 iron dukes I've owned.
Patrick MAR 30, 03:41 PM

quote
Originally posted by reinhart:

The reason there's some confusion on the unplugged tube running along the firewall, is there were two different designs. The early design the metal tube plugged into the intake snorkel. The later design plugged into the side of the air filter canister.

During the recall, if memory serves, the early design snorkel was replaced with a new snorkel that had no inlet for that metal pipe. Thus the pipe was open on either end and didn't need to be capped.




I believe you're mistaken.

From what I understand, the now non-utilized metal tube on the firewall used to connect the filtered side of the air canister to the front valve cover of the 2.8 engine. This acted as the air intake for the PCV system. The problem is that under certain conditions, air flow temporarily goes the other way. There was a fear of oil collecting in this tube and eventually creating a fire hazard (due to the cat being located immediately below.) The recall eliminated the firewall tube from the equation, and instead, a shorter replacement metal tube is used to connect the front valve cover to a redesigned snorkel with an inlet just ahead of the throttle body. This allows any oil vapors (which are temporarily going the "wrong" way) to more easily be drawn directly into the intake system and burned in the cylinders.

Reinhart, if you have any links which contradict what I've stated, I'd honestly appreciate being corrected.

From earlier in this thread...


quote
Originally posted by Patrick:

At the dealership during recall repairs, this particular task was dealt with a couple of different ways (from what I've discovered on my own and other people's Fieros). The left side end of that tube connects to the filtered side of the air filter canister. In most recalls, it appears that the tube was left attached to the canister, and the right side end of the tube was capped. Sometimes though, it appears that the tube was disconnected at the canister, and the canister itself was plugged/capped. In this situation, then sure, the right side end of the tube could remain open, as the tube was no longer connected to anything. However, never assume that this is the method that has been utilized when you see an uncapped tube, because if the tube is still connected to the air filter canister, then filthy unfiltered air is being drawn directly into the intake system.


[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 03-30-2021).]

reinhart MAR 30, 07:40 PM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:





What's your explanation for the OP's post-recall picture with the metal firewall tube that dead ends at the snorkel? What was that pre-recall?
Patrick MAR 30, 08:32 PM

quote
Originally posted by reinhart:

What's your explanation for the OP's post-recall picture with the metal firewall tube that dead ends at the snorkel?



It's not the best picture that the OP posted of that tube, but I already offered an explanation Here.

It is possible that the tube we're seeing is the end of the now unused firewall tube, but even so, that doesn't necessarily change anything I've stated in regards to what was modified for the recall. There would've originally been a rubber elbow attaching the firewall tube to the air filter canister.

Curly, can you please tell us where the other end of that tube goes?


quote
Originally posted by Curlrup:



What for and where?




[EDIT] Curiosity has gotten the best of me, and I've come across this diagram... supposedly of a pre-recall Fiero 2.8 PCV system. I have never ever (in 22 years of being here) seen a photo (rather than an illustration) of this type of setup where the firewall tube connects to the underside of the snorkel. Very strange. My '86 GT has the firewall tube (now capped on one end) connected to the filter canister. It was never at any time attached to a snorkel. It's nowhere near where the metal tube pictured above is located. Perhaps there were two different styles of pre-recall metal firewall tubes?

[This message has been edited by Patrick (edited 03-31-2021).]

Curlrup MAR 31, 07:23 AM
Yeah I'll get some picks when I head out.

Also...car is running decent. There's a lot of hesitation I noticed at low crawling through a parking lot speed.

I'm thinking vac lines still. Come on smoke machine hurry up.

Regardless, when you get on it. It goes! More fun than the 4 cylinder.
Curlrup MAR 31, 09:24 AM

quote
Originally posted by Patrick:


[EDIT] Curiosity has gotten the best of me, and I've come across this diagram... supposedly of a pre-recall Fiero 2.8 PCV system. I have never ever (in 22 years of being here) seen a photo (rather than an illustration) of this type of setup where the firewall tube connects to the underside of the snorkel. Very strange. My '86 GT has the firewall tube (now capped on one end) connected to the filter canister. It was never at any time attached to a snorkel. It's nowhere near where the metal tube pictured above is located. Perhaps there were two different styles of pre-recall metal firewall tubes?






I can't get a good angle to get a good photo. However, the two hardlines I speak of are actually ONE tube. It runs along the firewall, behind the air cleaner, then makes a sharp bend around the air cleaner can and comes out the other side. So the two photos I posts were just the two ends of the same tube. Nothing is connected to the air cleaner or snorkle. So exactly like the illustration shows.

[This message has been edited by Curlrup (edited 03-31-2021).]

Patrick MAR 31, 02:37 PM

quote
Originally posted by Curlrup:

So the two photos I posts were just the two ends of the same tube.



Yes, it's the firewall PCV tube that's no longer used. The surprise (for me anyway), is that there appears to have been two different styles of these metal tubes. They both originally connected to the front valve cover, but on the other end, one originally connected to the air filter canister while the other apparently connected to the underside of the snorkel.


quote
Originally posted by Curlrup:

Nothing is connected to the air cleaner or snorkle.



Correct, sort of. That firewall metal tube is no longer connected to anything, because your engine has had the recall work done. But the replacement PCV tube pictured above now goes from the front valve cover to the replacement snorkel.
Curlrup APR 01, 01:07 PM
Update of sorts. Just had it out for a decent run. Running...decent. At low speeds, say 20 mph when you hit the throttle it hesitates and backfires. If I remember right that is a rich running condition. It also smells very exhausty. Is that a thing? exhausty? Smells rich

Yes the cold start injector has been deleted. There is a huge bolt threaded into the fuel rail.

Still waiting on my smoke machine to hunt down all vac leaks. There has to be more vac leaks.

Other than that it goes great on some hard pulls. Just low speed, it hesitates.

Also if you get on the gas at 55 mph it feels like it's running on a rough road. It's odd. Off the gas smooth. Get on it. it's rumbly. The whole car is rumbly like it's on gravel. More to come as I work through this thing.
Curlrup APR 01, 04:01 PM
More data. It was on a half tank after 48 miles of driving....topped it off to see how much it actually used. 5.5 gallons. So it's getting 8.72 MPG....something is boned. It's running rich for sure right?

***edit to say O2 sensor ordered****

[This message has been edited by Curlrup (edited 04-01-2021).]