

 |
Schiff may be indicted ? (Page 1/2) |
|
Valkrie9
|
OCT 05, 08:45 PM
|
|
The Liar of Congress busted for lying ? Sentenced to the mandatory minimum ten years without parole, a fitting penalty.



|
|
|
Raydar
|
OCT 05, 08:59 PM
|
|
Of all of these cork-soakers, Adam Schiff is my "favorite" to despise. I hope he goes away for a long, long time.
|
|
|
Doug85GT
|
OCT 05, 09:00 PM
|
|
Schiff kept saying, "no one is above the law." He never thought that would be applied to him.
|
|
|
Valkrie9
|
OCT 06, 06:44 AM
|
|
 Sentenced to Chino Men's, in there with many he prosecuted, his new old friends, so happy to see him again, [ /maps/place/California+Institution+for+Men/ 33.981973, -117.6852171 ] ' Bend over and pick up that soap Adam, things are going to get real friendly, here in the shower ! ' ' Oh ! Jerome ! You're tearing me apart ! ' The scene fades into an aerial drone landscape view of the Chino horizon, Adam's screams fading, the credits roll. ..A perfect fate for a lifelong fraud, a tds inflicted fiend. A Snidely Whiplash, a bounder. Our Democracy Won’t Survive !

[This message has been edited by Valkrie9 (edited 10-06-2025).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
OCT 07, 11:50 AM
|
|
I'm no expert on what the law is about lying by House Reps but based on my memory of Schiff's statements during the Biden Administration's tenure, most if not all his claims about Russia Gate and other topics concerning DJT were bogues lies. It does appear an indictment is warranted.
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 10-07-2025).]
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
OCT 07, 01:28 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
I'm no expert on what the law is about lying by House Reps but based on my memory of Schiff's statements during the Biden Administration's tenure, most if not all his claims about Russia Gate and other topics concerning DJT were bogues lies. It does appear an indictment is warranted.
Rams
|
|
Completely agree... of all the people who need to be indicted, I've never seen such irresponsible politicization of things. Lying about the things he knows, suggesting that it's classified and that's why he can't share it. It's insane. People like him are very lucky that they don't have to take a polygraph or go through a background investigation... because he would undoubtedly fail.
|
|
|
blackrams
|
OCT 07, 03:02 PM
|
|
quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: Completely agree... of all the people who need to be indicted, I've never seen such irresponsible politicization of things. Lying about the things he knows, suggesting that it's classified and that's why he can't share it. It's insane. People like him are very lucky that they don't have to take a polygraph or go through a background investigation... because he would undoubtedly fail. |
|
Hey! DID I suggest you should agree with me? Back Up The Bus Bud.  Just attempting to throw a little Patricia into the discussion.
Rams  [This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 10-07-2025).]
|
|
|
Notorio
|
OCT 07, 08:26 PM
|
|
Sadly, this is much ado about nothing, merely a 'he said, she said' situation in the end. For the one whistleblower who would testify to what Schiff 'told them to do,' Democrats would produce many more witnesses who would refute the claim. There's no way Schiff would have written anything down, which would have been significant evidence.
About Schiff's continual lying to the American people, there is no law against that. Even though he repeatedly claimed, in public, to have 'irrefutable evidence' of collusion with Russia, when put behind closed doors, under oath, he admitted he did NOT have any such evidence. If he had lied under oath he could be indicted, but not for 'just' lying to The People. (I could be wrong about the closed-door meeting taking place and am too lazy to try looking it up right now. )
|
|
|
Valkrie9
|
OCT 07, 11:08 PM
|
|
Ominous sounds of the heavy footsteps of Justice approaching Schiff's bubble. ' Pop that zit ! ' 

[This message has been edited by Valkrie9 (edited 10-07-2025).]
|
|
|
Valkrie9
|
OCT 08, 12:03 AM
|
|
|

 |
|