Obama Ordered Brits to Spy on Trump (Page 1/1)
Doug85GT FEB 16, 03:01 PM
The corruption is deep. No need to hire low level thugs to bug your political opponent's. Just have a foreign power do the spying for you.


https://public.substack.com...-allies-spy-on-trump

[This message has been edited by Doug85GT (edited 02-16-2024).]

BingB FEB 16, 03:21 PM
This has been proven to be a fake. In fact it is a very poor one.

-Confuses "Christopher Steele" with "Michael Steele"

-Confuses "M15" with "M16"

-Multiple grammar and puncuation mistakes

-They even found the real document that the header and signature were copied from ( GCHQ director Robert Hannigan’s January 2017 resignation letter)


So if you want to claim it is real then tell us where it came from.

I'll wait.
ray b FEB 16, 04:15 PM
355,000,000.00 plus 83.000.000.00

does he have 440 million in cash LOL

only the best people work for the rump org
rinselberg FEB 16, 09:07 PM
Three years ago, a former high-ranking FBI official discussed how to guard against candidates for public office who have been groomed by foreign intelligence services as "assets."

The article includes links to other articles for background, distinguished by blue-colored text, which shows up well against the white background.

This is a generously-sized slice from the pie (so to speak) that is comprised by the entire article:

quote
Many Americans understandably, but mistakenly, assume that elected officials — particularly those whose positions come with security clearances — undergo a background investigation. Yet, the truth is that they don’t. A worker in the coffee shop at FBI headquarters is subjected to far more security vetting than any presidential candidate. The reason is tied to our national values as a democracy.

Rightfully, Americans place high value on the freedom to choose whomever they want as their next member of Congress or their next president. We are proud of the notion that anyone can rise to high office if they simply win an election. Imagine if we imposed some type of barrier to the Oval Office in the form of an FBI background investigation. At that point, a bunch of bureaucrats, not the American voters, would decide who could or could not become a senator or a president. No one wants that.

But there are measures we can and should demand, now that we’ve experienced our first president who personified a national security threat. The Fordham University School of Law issued a proposal in January 2020 that represents an excellent start. At minimum, we should see mandatory public disclosures of tax records, debt, property ownership, business holdings, international travel history, serious health issues, and any foreign interests of the candidate and immediate family to be collected and disseminated by the Federal Election Commission.

Let’s equip the American voter with the intelligence they need to make the most informed decision possible before electing someone hand-picked by our adversary — again.



"How to stop Russia from recruiting the next Trump"

quote
Voters deserve to know more about who they're electing.


Frank Figliuzzi for MSNBC; February 2, 2021.
https://www.msnbc.com/opini...-next-trump-n1256331

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-16-2024).]

rinselberg FEB 16, 10:37 PM
"Obama ordered Brits to spy on Trump"... that can't be right. Oh, I know:

"Obama ordered grits and pie for Trump" when President-Elect Trump met with President Obama at the White House on November 10, 2016.

Sometimes the words get a little bit jumbled. Like when people are playing "Telephone." It's a common thing.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-16-2024).]