 
     |
| "elderly man with a poor memory" (Page 1/15) |
|
williegoat
|
FEB 08, 04:51 PM
|
|
https://www.foxnews.com/pol...l-counsel-robert-hur
| quote | | "We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," Hur wrote in the report. "Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone from whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him—by then a former president well into his eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness." |
|
Well folks, there you have it. This is the official documented evaluation by the U.S. Government of our current president.------------------
"Ain't no rest for the whiskers."
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 08, 04:56 PM
|
|
25th amendment, anyone?
Bueller?....Bueller?
(How many read the title and thought I was talking about a forum member?)[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 02-08-2024).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 08, 06:13 PM
|
|
The thought just occurred to me that maybe the powers that be have made a deal with ol' Joe.
They might have offered him a deal where he bows out gracefully in exchange for immunity.
Probably more accurately, they made an offer to Jill.
Now, the question is: What about Kamala? Was she a signatory to the deal? Will she also "fade away"? They could easily destroy her.
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 08, 06:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 08, 06:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 08, 07:49 PM
|
|
We are waiting on the president to address the nation...if he doesn't get lost.
We shall see.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 08, 08:07 PM
|
|
Andrew Weissmann, former top official at the U.S. Department of Justice, and Neal Katyal, former Acting U.S. Solicitor General, are like the Roger Maris and Mickey Mantle of MSNBC's roster of legal analysts.
These "M&M Boys" had no way of knowing that they were echoing my own thoughts upon hearing of the Special Counsel's report, which I became privy to (along with anyone else that was watching MSNBC) before these on-air comments.
| quote | | Andrew Weissmann, former top official at the Justice Department and Neal Katyal, former Acting U.S. Solicitor General join Alicia Menendez in for Nicolle Wallace on Deadline White House reacts to the Special Counsel report dealing with the investigation President Joe Biden’s handling for classified documents, and why it was inappropriate for Special Counsel Robert Hur, providing commentary of President Biden’s age and memory, rather than sticking to the facts with the news that President Biden will not be charged with any crimes. |
|
MSNBC channel on YouTube; February 8, 2024.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-08-2024).]
|
|
|
|
randye
|
FEB 08, 10:52 PM
|
|
https://townhall.com/tipshe...poor-memory-n2634991
"In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden's memory was worse. He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended ("if it was 2013 - when did I stop being Vice President?"), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began ("in 2009, am I still Vice President?"). He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died. And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he mistakenly said he "had a real difference" of opinion with General Karl Eikenberry, when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr. Biden cited approvingly in his Thanksgiving memo to President Obama."
Pretendadent Potted Plant[This message has been edited by randye (edited 02-08-2024).]
|
|
|
|
Doug85GT
|
FEB 08, 11:10 PM
|
|
|
Not competent enough for criminal charges. So how is he competent enough to be president?
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 08, 11:51 PM
|
|
The text of Special Counsel Robert Hur's report is a disgrace to the Department of Justice. Robert Hur must be auditioning for what he hopes is another Trump administration after the November election. He is either eyeing some role in what he hopes will be a Trump administration, or thinking he can advantage himself as a lawyer in the private sector by packaging himself as a rabidly partisan Republican with overtones of "MAGA."
Where was Attorney General Merrick Garland? Garland shouldn't have allowed the report to be published with all that "extracurricular" editorializing about the case embedded within it.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-09-2024).]
|
|
|
|