
 |
| Abbott V Biden (Page 9/9) |
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 06, 11:02 AM
|
|
The Supreme Court can still gum up the works and eliminate any possibility of Trump being tried before the election in the federal (Jack Smith) 2020 election interference case.
Trump can appeal to the Supreme Court by Monday next. The "Supremes" can drag out their deliberations long enough to prevent Trump going to trial before the election. Even their deliberations about whether to "grant cert" or hear the case.
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 06, 11:06 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
Anyone want to bet on whether or not there is appeal to the full appeals court? 
Rams |
|
It will go to the supreme court. That is why the trial is on hold. The left is now crying "Justice delayed is justice denied", not understanding that that concept applies to the defendant, not the prosecution. In fact, that concept should be applied to the J6 defendants.
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 06, 11:09 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
The Supreme Court can still gum up the works and eliminate any possibility of Trump being tried before the election in the federal (Jack Smith) 2020 election interference case.
Trump can appeal to the Supreme Court by Monday next. The "Supremes" can drag out their deliberations long enough to prevent Trump going to trial before the election. Even their deliberations about whether to "grant cert" or hear the case. |
|
So, what were you just saying on the last page?
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 06, 11:56 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat: It will go to the Supreme Court. That is why the trial is on hold. The left is now crying "Justice delayed is justice denied", not understanding that that concept applies to the defendant, not the prosecution. In fact, that concept should be applied to the J6 defendants. |
|
It's not just a defendant that has a right to a "speedy" trial. It's also the nation at large, that is looking on and awaiting to see how justice is served.
I have this on the authority of numerous "talking heads" who are credited as "contributors" on MSNBC cable TV broadcasts.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 06, 11:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
It's not just a defendant that has a right to a "speedy" trial. It's also the nation at large, that is looking on and awaiting to see how justice is served.
I have this on the authority of numerous "talking heads" who are credited as "contributors" on MSNBC cable TV broadcasts. |
|
You suck up bad information like a thirsty sponge.
|
|
|
williegoat
|
FEB 06, 12:05 PM
|
|
https://constitution.congre...itution/amendment-6/
| quote | Sixth Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. |
|
|
|

 |