
 |
| InBev ... Bud Light is really hitting the fan. (Page 8/10) |
|
cliffw
|
JUL 19, 10:56 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
AB InBev is a global enterprise. There are AB InBev facilities on every continent ....
|
|
Where is the one in Antartica ?
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JUL 23, 07:23 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cliffw: Where is the [AB InBev facility] in Antartica? |
|
Well... I misspoke. But there is an Antarctica Pilsen that's brewed by AB InBev in Brazil's most populous city of São Paulo. A megacity. It's sold in cans and bottles.
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JUL 23, 11:30 PM
|
|
Remember when WaPo used to do real journalism? Now it's a fake news leftist propaganda mill. Remember when the left gave them Pulitzers for Russiagate, when later we found out it was all a hoax, but the left never retracts it's lies because it's all propaganda.
Most of us know this, that's why most don't believe them nor read their crap.
Go Woke, Go Broke.
 [This message has been edited by Wichita (edited 07-23-2023).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JUL 24, 02:28 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Wichita: Remember when WaPo used to do real journalism? Now it's a fake news leftist propaganda mill. Remember when the left gave them Pulitzers for Russiagate, when later we found out it was all a hoax, but the left never retracts [its] lies because it's all propaganda. Most of us know this, that's why most don't believe them nor read their crap. |
|
So... the Special Counsel's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. national elections—"Russiagate" as Wichita has it— was a hoax?
If you like what Wichita said here, then don't look at this web page. You won't like it: https://www.acslaw.org/proj...-the-mueller-report/
| quote | | Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress represents a critical opportunity for the legal community to help the American people understand what is in his March 2019 Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election. The following summary presents key findings from the Mueller Report and is intended to help lawyers and other concerned citizens speak and write about the Special Counsel’s findings in an informed manner. The summary was prepared by the Presidential Investigation Education Project, a partnership between the American Constitution Society (ACS) and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to promote an informed public evaluation of the investigations of Special Counsel Mueller and others into Russian interference in our elections. |
|
These are the section headers for "Key Findings of the Mueller Report":
- The Special Counsel investigation uncovered extensive criminal activity
- Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016
- The investigation “identified numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign” and established that the Trump Campaign “showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their potential to damage candidate Clinton”
- Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct
- Congress needs to continue investigating and assessing elements of the Mueller Report
Each section header is elaborated with text and bullet points; this is how the first section is elaborated:
- The investigation produced 37 indictments; seven guilty pleas or convictions; and compelling evidence that the president obstructed justice on multiple occasions. Mueller also uncovered and referred 14 criminal matters to other components of the Department of Justice.
- Trump associates repeatedly lied to investigators about their contacts with Russians, and President Trump refused to answer questions about his efforts to impede federal proceedings and influence the testimony of witnesses.
- A statement signed by over 1,000 former federal prosecutors concluded that if any other American engaged in the same efforts to impede federal proceedings the way Trump did, they would likely be indicted for multiple charges of obstruction of justice.
 [This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 07-24-2023).]
|
|
|
cliffw
|
JUL 24, 06:59 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg: So... the Special Counsel's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. national elections—"Russiagate" as Wichita has it— was a hoax?
|
|
One morsel of truth does not give them any credibility that they were investigating a hoax !
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JUL 24, 09:05 AM
|
|
Another 27.1% sales down year over year this past week.
And now, DeSantis is suing InBev for intentionally doing something that they likely knew would affect stock prices.
I'm surprised this hasn't turned into a class-action lawsuit yet. If this lawsuit is successful, it'll create precedent that will spook future companies from getting involved in politics as they know it can and would affect their bottom line, and unequivocally lead to successful lawsuits against them.
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JUL 24, 09:09 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
... snip
|
|
The investigation was precipitated by Democrats because they had been led to believe by Hillary Clinton that Trump colluded with Russia to win the election ... which most in the FBI and Mueller already knew not to be true.
We know without a doubt that Trump did not collude with Russia... but they continued it for as long as they could by expanding the size and scope of the investigation into everything they could to try to legitimize it.
|
|
|
fredtoast
|
JUL 24, 09:58 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Wichita:
Remember when WaPo used to do real journalism? Now it's a fake news leftist propaganda mill. Remember when the left gave them Pulitzers for Russiagate, when later we found out it was all a hoax,
|
|
"Russiagate" was never found to be a hoax.
The Meuller Report said it was NOT a hoax.
The REPUBLICAN led Senate intelligence committee said it was NOT a hoax.
The only people who say it was a hoax are those trapped in the right-wing echo chamber.
|
|
|
fredtoast
|
JUL 24, 10:21 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
The investigation was precipitated by Democrats because they had been led to believe by Hillary Clinton that Trump colluded with Russia to win the election ... which most in the FBI and Mueller already knew not to be true.
|
|
This is 100% false.
The FBI started the investigation because Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulus told an ambassador from Australia, Alexander Downer, that the Russians would assist the Trump campaign by releasing information damaging to Hillary Clinton. This has been 100% confirmed by every group that has looked at the FACTS.
Hillary Clinton did nothing to suggest that the Russians had damaging information and used it to help Trump win the election. That proof comes from dozens of emails between Trump's campaign advisors and Russian nationals with ties to Putin. This is the same information that led to all the indictments and charges against Russian nationals.
Please post a link to the source that backs up your claim. I guarantee it is an opinion piece from the right-wing echo chamber because it is not based on any FACTS at all.
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JUL 24, 10:26 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by fredtoast: This is 100% false.
The FBI started the investigation because Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulus told an ambassador from Australia, Alexander Downer, that the Russians would assist the Trump campaign by releasing information damaging to Hillary Clinton. This has been 100% confirmed by every group that has looked at the FACTS.
Hillary Clinton did nothing to suggest that the Russians had damaging information and used it to help Trump win the election. That proof comes from dozens of emails between Trump's campaign advisors and Russian nationals with ties to Putin. This is the same information that led to all the indictments and charges against Russian nationals.
Please post a link to the source that backs up your claim. I guarantee it is an opinion piece from the right-wing echo chamber because it is not based on any FACTS at all.
|
|
I mean, it's been well-established that Hillary funded the Steele Dossier, and then gave it to the FBI, who then leaked it to news media sites in order to generate news from it. This has been reaffirmed by whistleblowers, as well as the follow-on investigation. So, you're basically living in denial... which makes no real difference to me.
|
|

 |