 
     |
| Mr Projected Sea Level Rise Skeptic, that glass of water and ice cube meme is BULL*** (Page 8/9) |
|
MidEngineManiac
|
DEC 03, 11:05 PM
|
|
OK...but I still gotta ask..
Who were the ones catching the sale property. ?
Never mind the buyers (disgusting as it is)
But the ones who wacked them over the head and sold them ?????
WHO were those ?
We dont (as a society) tolerate tusk-hunting for piano keys anymore, and hold the hunters responsible.
So whats different with those hunters ?
Or...IOW.... 
(Willie...., my ex is from Guyana. Black and Portuguese. 2 kids (boys)...You aint gonna win dude, I been at this for 25 years. I also learned Portugese women are nuts, and do NOT put pee-pee into insane black mama's who do the sideways head thing)
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
DEC 03, 11:21 PM
|
|
This research is focused on the years from about 1500 to 1750, when the CO2 in the air all around the world was somewhere below or close to just 280 ppm. This is known by various evidence including air samples from that time, which have been preserved as air bubbles in glacial ice. The ice has been "cored out" and analyzed to measure the CO2 in the air bubbles and zero in on the years when the air was trapped within the newly frozen ice.
The latest data confirms CO2 levels are now hovering closely around 421 parts per million—the greatest concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide in at least 4 million years (by various kinds of evidence), and significantly more than the 280 ppm or under that was prevalent during the Little Ice Age in Europe.
So, 420 ppm today, vs 280 (or below) ppm during the Little Ice Age in Europe.
This Little Ice Age research does not undermine or detract from the "big picture" from climate researchers about greenhouse gas emissions and continuing and predictably accelerating global warming. Neither this Little Ice Age research or the current "big picture" are silly. But this is:
A "refresher" on the Silly concept.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 12-03-2022).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 03, 11:28 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:
(Willie...., my ex is from Guyana. Black and Portuguese. 2 kids (boys)...You aint gonna win dude, I been at this for 25 years. I also learned Portugese women are nuts, and do NOT put pee-pee into insane black mama's who do the sideways head thing) |
|
I'm not trying to "win" anything, but it is important for everyone to understand that the USA played a very small part in the history of slavery.
Of course I think most people understand that Africans captured Africans and sold them to Europeans. Asians also caught Europeans and sold them to other Asians. The indigenous population of the western hemisphere did the same.
Humans still enslave other humans.
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 03, 11:46 PM
|
|
The Transatlantic Slave Trade by the numbers:
I have posted these numbers before.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
DEC 04, 02:07 AM
|
|
|
|
cliffw
|
DEC 04, 06:52 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
"[Abraham] Lincoln himself owned slaves." (According to MEM.)
I don't think so. Unless MEM is talking about some other Lincoln.
"The Lincolns had servants, but they weren't slaves." |
|
Who bought them for him ? Did he go to Africa and enlist foreigners to serve him ?
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
DEC 04, 07:55 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cliffw:
Who bought them for him ? Did he go to Africa and enlist foreigners to serve him ? |
|
You should scroll through the article at the link that I posted.
|
|
|
|
cliffw
|
DEC 04, 09:07 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
You should scroll through the article at the link that I posted. |
|
Ok. I will.
It is getting harder to indulge you.
|
|
|
|
cliffw
|
DEC 04, 02:07 PM
|
|
Ok. I read your dribble. Do you want to talk about it ?
| quote |
Now, here’s the really funny part. The proof that Mary Johnson was a free woman is right there in the 1860 census, the very source being offered as evidence that she was a slave. In other words, the problem here is that the blogger in question simply doesn’t know how to read the document.
Here’s the page in question. |
|
#blah blah blah#
| quote |
See the very top, where it says “SCHEDULE 1.—Free Inhabitants ?
That’s sort of an indicator that all the folks in that list were, you know, free inhabitants of Springfield. The 1860 census counted slaves separately. You’re not going to find any slaves officially listed in a census list of free inhabitants.
Of course, you’re not likely to find many slaves documented in the census lists for Illinois at all, since Illinois was a free state.Of course, you’re not likely to find any slaves documented in the census lists for Illinois at all, since Illinois was a free state. |
|
 You are not going to find any slaves documented officially listed, to, your not not likely to find many.
I once opined to you that you lack critical thinking skills. I am more inclined to believe now that they are definitely limited. As are mine.
Not to worry. We are here to help you.
What color helps you understand better. I wonder,  , will the forum support cryan ? .
No.
hmm . Turquoise is the best that I can do for you.
Ok. According to your opinion source, Well, let's just start right here.
| quote | rinselberg's information feedbag
The 1860 census counted slaves separately. blah blah blah. |
|
From the same feedbag.
Ok
Of course, you’re not likely to find many slaves documented in the census lists for Illinois at all, since Illinois was a free state.[/b]
So, you would have us believe, ..., Illinois was a free state, yet, didn't have many slaves documented on the census. How many were ... not declared, to flow with the political winds ? Was there a place on the census to claim slaves ?
What would rinselberg think ? Mr Abraham's census report. Is that because the servants had to stay there, at Lincoln's residence ?
You are almost as fun as my sex life. I will let you imagine of how great it is,  .[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 12-04-2022).]
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
DEC 04, 02:29 PM
|
|
I don't think Abraham Lincoln ever owned any slaves. I agree with the article linked by rinselberg.
I happen to have a copy of a similar document from the 1900 census in Alabama which lists Victoria Richardson, a 24 years old black female, as a servant. Why do I have a copy of this document? Because the family she lived with was my family.
 | | CLICK FOR FULL SIZE |
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 12-04-2022).]
|
|
|
|