 
     |
| Martha's Vineyard NIMBY (Page 5/10) |
|
ray b
|
SEP 18, 09:53 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
It's interesting how those illegal aliens are telling a different story. You know, one of agreeing to fly to Mass and signing that agreement. No guns were held to their heads either.  All you really needed to do was back up your accusation with some evidence. Such lies are why so little of what you post is accepted. Well, that and the attitude presented along with the very poor grammar and punctation or postings that appear a five-year-old got hold of a computer.
Rams
|
|
''At his [ die satan] request this year, Republican lawmakers set up a $12 million fund to transport unauthorized migrants out of Florida. There's no word if that fund allows for transporting them out of Texas. But there's also been a suggestion by some that this may run afoul with federal anti-trafficking laws.''
and '' Again, just to be very clear, 12 million to move migrants out of Florida - how many of the migrants had previously been in Florida?
ALLEN: Well, those - these were all from Texas. They were taken from a shelter in San Antonio.''
NPR
what fiction are you now spreading about an unseen unknown agreement
there was NO stinking agreement just lies and a con
the refugees said '' WHERE ARE WE why are we here where do we stay
where are the jobs the Gop shills promise why did the lie to us ''
non said thanks to die satan all said why did you do this to us[This message has been edited by ray b (edited 09-18-2022).]
|
|
|
|
Wichita
|
SEP 18, 10:17 AM
|
|
Why is it not called "human trafficking" when the left does it? 🤔
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
SEP 18, 10:46 AM
|
|
you do understand
immigrants are taken into federal custody
and the feds can and do move them where the fed wants legally
the texas registered asylum applicants are semi legal and NOT subject to state custody
and were never in fla except for as stop on the flight up north
is that too hard to understand ?
die satan has no legal way to move anyone in texas
except to LIE to them
|
|
|
|
blackrams
|
SEP 18, 12:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
semi legal |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong but, isn't that kind of like being semi-pregnant?
Pretty sure immigration laws haven't been changed lately, Brandon has chosen to ignore them.
If you don't like the law(s), get them changed. Oh wait, as a whole, American citizens are for Legal Immigration but not Illegal Immigration.
Rams
|
|
|
|
Hudini
|
SEP 18, 12:21 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
<snip>
What do we have now? Asylum seekers being bussed or flown to various places like near the Vice President's home in DC, or New York City, or Martha's Vineyard, and a lot of self-congratulatory but mostly fictional memes and messages online (like this very forum thread) about how traumatizing this is for the residents of DC, New York City, Martha's Vineyard (etc.)
|
|
I see your issue. You called them "Asylum seekers". This is incorrect. There is no such thing as economic asylum. There is political asylum but these folks are not fleeing an oppressive government. They are seeking a job. And once employed here they will send a big chunk of that money back home. This is not their home. If they want to immigrate it needs to be legal.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
SEP 18, 12:31 PM
|
|
well they are registered asylum seekers
so trying for legal status
and not currently in a illegal or deportable status under the fed laws
non-arrestable under state laws
and yes most were from V that is a semi-socialist state
with both political and economic distress so have a chance at getting
political refugee status
I think that law is not in our best interests
and we should only let in the ones we see a value in admitting
not just ones with the most evil home governments
but only ones that can be best for our nation
|
|
|
blackrams
|
SEP 18, 01:26 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
I think that law is not in our best interests
and we should only let in the ones we see a value in admitting
not just ones with the most evil home governments
but only ones that can be best for our nation |
|
Wow, I'm impressed Ray, although punctuation is lacking, that's a very readable and understandable statement. (Please tell me that's your own original statement and not a cut and paste._
So, tell me this, who gets to decide which ones are best for our nation? You do realize that we may not agree on who has value?
BTW, laws are what regulate how our society operates, the problem is, many are not enforced.
If you don't like the law(s), get them changed or IMHO, enforce them.
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 09-18-2022).]
|
|
|
|
WonderBoy
|
SEP 18, 02:17 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
and yes most were from V that is a semi-socialist state
with both political and economic distress so have a chance at getting
political refugee status
I think that law is not in our best interests
and we should only let in the ones we see a value in admitting
not just ones with the most evil home governments
but only ones that can be best for our nation |
|
Funny, when da-rump said that, he's a PROFILING deplorable racist Walmart shopping white supremacist....
Unbelievable Hypocrisy.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
SEP 18, 08:22 PM
|
|
We know how to shut them up.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
SEP 18, 08:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
