

 |
| 2022 CONGRESSIONAL MIDTERM ELECTIONS (Page 5/10) |
|
randye
|
JAN 09, 03:47 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
About 15 years ago my youngest sister of around 17 was wearing a Santana shirt at Mom's house.
I said, "Oh, you like Santana?"
She responded that "It's a new band, you wouldn't understand them."
You see randye, you just wouldn't understand the ins and outs of the Libertarian Party. It's cool and hip, and goes with the least offensive Politicians available. They are OK with Communism, as long as it's not that mean tweater. Join them about two months before the next Presidential election when they will once again push forward someone you've never heard of before and profess them the greatest thing since sliced bread! |
|
That's funny and also sadly too accurate.
Having 2 grown children and 6 Grandchildren I've heard that familiar old refrain "you're too old, you wouldn't understand" countless times.
All of the "Bern victims", a/k/a Bernie Sanders supporters, said the same crap. "You don't understand "Democratic Socialism", you're too old, out of touch".....(all while the dumb children, and retarded adults, that they are supported a 75 year old Marxist !!)
I also watched with mild bemusement during presidential campaigns in 2016 and again in 2020 as Leftists tried SO hard to woo Libertarians over to their side by trying to convince them they had so much in common.
There's an old saying - "Libertarians are like house cats. They think they're completely independent when in reality they're completely dependent. They just ignore all the things they depend on."
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-09-2022).]
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JAN 10, 03:26 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
...I’m a Libertarian 
The way I see it, Democrats are currently in a war between Democrats and Progressives. Republicans had their war between the Republicans and Trumpians already, and the Trumpians won. So there aren’t that many left that I’d support. |
|
I'd like to have a reasonable discussion here, and I'm not attacking you, to be clear. But you state this above, and the questions that first pop into my head are:
1 - What exactly is a Democrat today? 2 - What exactly does a Democrat stand for? 3 - What do you think the significant difference is between them... socialism comes to mind for me.
I then also see that you say you are a libertarian, and I question how'd you define that in the scope of what you consider libertarian values, and which ones you agree with? I reckon (since I lived in Texas for 4 years) that abortions and illicit drugs would fall into the category of being "legal" under a true libertarian ideology. But beyond that, I'm interested to know where you stand.
I then echo Fats' comment:
| quote | Originally posted by Fats: So you are a Libertarian that's trying to figure out if you support the Democrats or Republicans?
|
|
And I would agree strongly with what Fats asks. I say that because quite honestly, other than abortion, there is literally nothing even remotely close to the idea of being a libertarian on the Democrat side. So I guess either I have a completely different understanding of what a libertarian is, or it's changed significantly?
On that, Trump is the most liberal "Republican" the party has ever had. Trump is basically Bill Clinton circa 1996, in most ways. Trump has the same immigration views, the same fiscal views, and the same trade views. Trump is not like most Republicans when it comes to tariffs, and Trump is also by and large, a supporter of several unions.
So you continue with this:
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub: I won’t vote for another Republican until they denounce Trumpian fascism. The Republican Party lost me as a voter, along with many other moderates, when they refused to listen to or even consider their vote in Trump’s impeachment.
So no I’m not really trying to figure out who I support. I don’t support the Democrats, but when a moderate Democrat is an option, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. |
|
Honestly... you lose credibility here with me, for whatever that matters, and that's "ok." But there's no such thing as "Trump fascism." Trump is absolutely a nationalist, but if you think that defines fascism, you'd be incorrect. I also question if you've ever lived under a fascist rule, or understand what it's like. To be clear, I haven't either... but I did pretty much grow up in Miami, and my mom fled a fascist dictatorship in Argentina in the early 1960s, and my dad literally was born in a shack during the NAZI fascist occupation of the Netherlands. Fascism is more appropriately like what we're seeing right now with tearing down statues, re-writing history, regulating speech, and the government controlling everything.
And on that, I again ask, in what way, shape, or form do the Democrats more closely align with libertarianism? For as long as I've known you, you've mostly always been a Democrat. I remember you were a big fan of Kusinich (or whatever his name is) back in the day. I think you lose credibility in your argument (whatever that is) when you start going down that path of regurgitating "radical" language that only ultra-progressives push.
It's OK if you're a Democrat and perhaps embarrassed to be defined as one. Maybe you really don't like the Democrats at all, and that's OK. Help me understand exactly (without throwing meaningless "Trump is a fascist" comments) where you are on this? I'd be willing to bet that if you legitimately are a libertarian, we are probably pretty close in ideologies... and you're further apart from Democrats than you are from Republicans.[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 01-10-2022).]
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 10, 05:46 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I'd like to have a reasonable discussion here, and I'm not attacking you, to be clear. But you state this above, and the questions that first pop into my head is:
1 - What exactly is a Democrat today? 2 - What exactly does a Democrat stand for? 3 - What do you think the significant difference is between then... socialism comes to mind for me.
I then also see that you say you are a libertarian, and I question how you define that, in the scope of what you consider libertarian values, and which ones you agree with?
|
|
- Democrats are in two camps - when I describe it above, I talk to a difference between Democrat and Progressive for simplicity, but I mean the more moderate crew from the progressive. My view of Democrats is that they're loud on rhetoric but quiet on action, and that's largely because I think most of the old Democrats today are Clinton-esque fairly moderate Democrats, who say words that progressives want to hear to capture their vote but have no intention of following through.
- I don't think Democrats or Republicans have a single foundation they build on for their conflicting beliefs... so this is fairly unanswerable by me. It's a collection of almost random ideas, similar to Republicans, but flipped. Take their party platform and put it on ice - they don't firmly believe in everything in there, but it's directionally there.
- To me, Progressives do have a fairly firm foundation (even if I disagree with it). They believe strongly in all positive rights, and believe the government has an obligation to provide for those rights. Moderate Democrats don't believe in all positive rights, and when they do, they provide for it in the form of a program built for low-income populations, not everyone. To me, it's the difference between erasing all student loan debt (Progressive) and expanding a loan-forgiveness program (Democrat).
I define Libertarian as believing in all negative rights without positive rights. It's the Non-Aggression Principle personified. I take a pledge each year that I renew my membership, which states "I hereby certify that I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals." If you go to the Libertarian Party Platform, I'm in agreement with everything, with the possible exception of the idea that a government should never incur debt. Responsible debt is not always a bad thing. In sum, that seems like a pretty small disagreement, though. On a practical level, I recognize the enforcement of some negative rights require positive rights (i.e., law enforcement is necessary to enforce that you cannot steal my property, and the public has some positive rights due to this relationship), but that's fairly nuanced and not really the spirit of the distinction. I have other "practical beliefs" like understanding basic infrastructure and education is more efficiently cared for by a government than a loose collection of private parties, but honestly, it just doesn't really come up so I don't have to make tough voting decisions based on the intersection of my "practical" vs. "theoretical" beliefs.
| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
So you are a Libertarian that's trying to figure out if you support the Democrats or Republicans?
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
And I would agree strongly with what Fats asks.
I say that because quite honestly, Trump is the most liberal "Republican" the party has ever had. Trump is basically Bill Clinton circa 1996, in a lot of ways. Trump has the same immigration views, the same fiscal views, and the same trade views. Trump is not like most Republicans when it comes to tariffs, and Trump is also by and large, a supporter of several unions.
|
|
This isn't exhaustive, just some of the top items I think of: Where I disagree with Trump
- Abortion
- Civil Asset Forfeiture
- Immigration
- Healthcare (I'm closer to Republicans, while Trump wanted to artificially force lower prices)
- Law enforcement (I would go further)
- Section 230
- Drugs (his actions removed protections, though his words indicated he thought otherwise)
- Arbitrary tariffs
Where I agree with Trump:
- Second amendment
- Pulling out of Syria, Afghanistan (I give Trump credit for the decision, Biden and Trump both fault in implementation)
- Individual taxes
- Business taxes
Since you brought it up, I have very little opinion on unions. Individuals should always have a right to unify and collectively bargain. The government shouldn't do anything to put them down. They also shouldn't protect them more than any other voluntary agreement.
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: So you continue with this:
And honestly... you lose credibility here with me, for whatever that matters, and I don't think it matters much, and that's "ok." But there's no such thing as "Trump fascism." Trump is absolutely a nationalist, but if you think that defines fascism, you'd be incorrect. I also question if you've ever lived under a fascist rule, or understand what it's like. To be clear, I haven't either... but I did pretty much grow up in Miami, and my mom fled a fascist dictatorship in Argentina in the early 1960s, and my dad literally was born in a shack during the NAZI fascist occupation of the Netherlands.
Fascism is more appropriately like what we're seeing right now with tearing down statues, re-writing history, regulating speech, and the government controlling everything.
Not that it really matters, because for as long as I've known you, you've mostly always been a Democrat. I remember you were a big fan of Kusinich (or whatever his name is) back in the day.
I think you lose credibility in your argument (whatever that is) when you start going down that path of regurgitating "radical" language that only ultra-progressives push. |
|
I don't know who Kusinich is? So I don't think I was a big fan
I absolutely believe the Trumpian movement falls under the fascist umbrella. He continued to push lies about the election in an effort to sow distrust in the voting process and overthrow the election results. He tried to get Vice President Pence to toss the electors' votes out and not certify the election, because of these lies. But even then, my statement isn't just about Trump himself. It's the "Trumpian" movement that is fascist. Attempting to overthrow the election with violence, calls to limit the freedom of the press, limit religious freedom with Muslims... But it's not any of these taken at face value, it's more the collection of this combined with them essentially overtaking the Republican Party and being increasingly comfortable with the idea of political violence. If we stop the movement today, would it be called fascism in 2030? No. But we have seen the beginning stages, and I do think it's fair to say it's going in that direction if the Republican Party doesn't take itself back from the Trumpians and denounce some of that behavior.
---
Edit to address your edit:
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
And on that, I again ask, in what way, shape, or form do the Democrats more closely align with libertarianism? For as long as I've known you, you've mostly always been a Democrat. I remember you were a big fan of Kusinich (or whatever his name is) back in the day. I think you lose credibility in your argument (whatever that is) when you start going down that path of regurgitating "radical" language that only ultra-progressives push.
It's OK if you're a Democrat and perhaps embarrassed to be defined as one. Maybe you really don't like the Democrats at all, and that's OK. Help me understand exactly (without throwing meaningless "Trump is a fascist" comments) where you are on this? I'd be willing to bet that if you legitimately are a libertarian, we are probably pretty close in ideologies... and you're further apart from Democrats than you are from Republicans.
|
|
Just to be clear, I do not align closely with either major party, especially on their methods. But on a broad stroke... Where I align with Democrats:
- Abortion
- Voting rights
- Immigration
- LGBTQ+ rights, and similar things I'd associate with the First Amendment, as we have a right from religion just as much as a right for religion
- Capital Punishment
- Generally, more lax sentences for crime
- Privacy and internet protections
- Social justice (I oppose most government action in this area, except where government action caused the imbalance, but it's worth mentioning)
Where I align with Republicans:
- Second amendment
- Healthcare, kinda
- Taxes
Where neither party gets me:
- Military spending
- Environmental policies, kinda
- Police reform
- Justice system reform
- Education, especially higher education
When it comes to the "big rocks," I'm really not aligned with either party. So it's fairly easy for me to drop support of Republicans until they figure their **** out. Neither party supports my goals, and taxes are not the only thing I need to consider when voting.
I hope this is enough context for you to understand that it's not just lip service. The Republican Party is not just losing votes of people who are just "Democrat-lite." They'll win 2022, handily, but I'm desperately hoping they rediscover themselves before 2024.[This message has been edited by theBDub (edited 01-10-2022).]
|
|
|
ray b
|
JAN 11, 10:34 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye: Please allow me to help illustrate your, (correct), point:
A group of Demorats posing:

From freeing the Demorat's slaves all the way to civil rights legislation, the Republican party has led the way in righting wrongs.
Oh and "that Civil War thing"....that is STILL the only real insurrection that ever happened in this country and that was Demorats.
|
|
yes those are all CON'S THAT IS THE BIT OUR CON'S FORGET ON PURPOSE [and that is lying to others here] NONE OF THOSE GUYS WOULD BE A CURRENT MEMBER/VOTER OF THE 2022 DEMOCRATIC PARTY they would be trump supporters maga hat haters every last one
those are your people randy not my guys and you know it
|
|
|
sourmash
|
JAN 11, 11:01 AM
|
|
Really, so why didn't the Democrat Party reform under a different name and separate itself from it's history?
Sen Byrd served until recent times, having been revered within a Klan.
You take the whole thing or you don't. It's still the same party.[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 01-11-2022).]
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JAN 11, 11:06 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
yes those are all CON'S THAT IS THE BIT OUR CON'S FORGET ON PURPOSE [and that is lying to others here] NONE OF THOSE GUYS WOULD BE A CURRENT MEMBER/VOTER OF THE 2022 DEMOCRATIC PARTY they would be trump supporters maga hat haters every last one
those are your people randy not my guys and you know it |
|
History wasn't your favorite topic I school, was it?
|
|
|
Fats
|
JAN 11, 11:08 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
yes those are all CON'S THAT IS THE BIT OUR CON'S FORGET ON PURPOSE [and that is lying to others here] NONE OF THOSE GUYS WOULD BE A CURRENT MEMBER/VOTER OF THE 2022 DEMOCRATIC PARTY they would be trump supporters maga hat haters every last one
those are your people randy not my guys and you know it |
|
You are deflecting. There was no switch in the parties. Anyone that tries to push that is lying, and knows they are lying. Just as the Democrats acted in the past, they act in the present.
|
|
|
Fats
|
JAN 11, 11:18 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
Just to be clear, I do not align closely with either major party, especially on their methods. But on a broad stroke... Where I align with Democrats:
- Abortion
- Voting rights
- Immigration
- LGBTQ+ rights, and similar things I'd associate with the First Amendment, as we have a right from religion just as much as a right for religion
- Capital Punishment
- Generally, more lax sentences for crime
- Privacy and internet protections
- Social justice (I oppose most government action in this area, except where government action caused the imbalance, but it's worth mentioning)
Where I align with Republicans:
- Second amendment
- Healthcare, kinda
- Taxes
Where neither party gets me:
- Military spending
- Environmental policies, kinda
- Police reform
- Justice system reform
- Education, especially higher education
When it comes to the "big rocks," I'm really not aligned with either party. So it's fairly easy for me to drop support of Republicans until they figure their **** out. Neither party supports my goals, and taxes are not the only thing I need to consider when voting.
I hope this is enough context for you to understand that it's not just lip service. The Republican Party is not just losing votes of people who are just "Democrat-lite." They'll win 2022, handily, but I'm desperately hoping they rediscover themselves before 2024.
|
|
I'm curious about a few things. Abortion: The Democrat parties stance is that the "Government" pays for anyone who wants one to get an abortion. We all know that this is forcing taxpayers to support something the majority doesn't believe in, and should go directly against Libertarian beliefs as I understand them. Voting Rights? Are you getting these talking points from CNN? Allowing anyone to vote with no way to track who has voted and how many times takes votes away from everyone who follows the rules. Immigration? You mean removing our borders? That's the "immigration plan" from the Democrats. LGBTQRSTUV rights? Do you not see these people as people because they are gay? We all have the same rights regardless of your beliefs. That's one of the basic foundations of our country.
Reading through your response, you aren't Libertarian, you want the Government to provide for you, and keep you safe, even if it harms other people.
|
|
|
theBDub
|
JAN 11, 11:42 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
I'm curious about a few things. Abortion: The Democrat parties stance is that the "Government" pays for anyone who wants one to get an abortion. We all know that this is forcing taxpayers to support something the majority doesn't believe in, and should go directly against Libertarian beliefs as I understand them. Voting Rights? Are you getting these talking points from CNN? Allowing anyone to vote with no way to track who has voted and how many times takes votes away from everyone who follows the rules. Immigration? You mean removing our borders? That's the "immigration plan" from the Democrats. LGBTQRSTUV rights? Do you not see these people as people because they are gay? We all have the same rights regardless of your beliefs. That's one of the basic foundations of our country.
Reading through your response, you aren't Libertarian, you want the Government to provide for you, and keep you safe, even if it harms other people. |
|
I already stated that I don't always agree on their methods, or even often. I would not characterize the Democrat party's stance on abortion primarily being about who pays for it, it's about access. Abortion should be just as accessible as any other healthcare procedure, and my stance on healthcare is that it is not a right, as that would be a positive right. Healthcare is, instead, an agreement between a healthcare provider and a healthcare recipient, and I don't believe government should be involved.
I provided simple bullets because I don't think anyone is interested in a full dissection of every one of those bullets and how I think of them. I can expand on this all day, but you'll see a common theme here - less government restriction.
Voting rights - Any citizen of the United States should be able to vote in an election. I believe felons should be able to vote, those on probation, etc. You shouldn't have to register to vote--any citizen should be able to. I don't believe in any restrictions to vote. I do believe a form of identification should be required as a matter of logistics.
Immigration - yes, I believe in removing many barriers to immigration. It should be incredibly easy. You can refer to the Libertarian Party platform: https://www.lp.org/issues/immigration/
LGBTQ+ - Unfortunately, the Republican Party doesn't recognize everyone has equal rights. The current Republican Party Platform still, today, notes marriage as being defined between man and woman and rejects same-sex marriage. The government shouldn't even care about marriage or have any say in it, but because it does, it should be defined in terms that are not based on religious principles. Also, I am against the recent Republican laws against trans* participation in a number of activities, and access to transitionary healthcare.
|
|
|
ray b
|
JAN 11, 12:28 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
History wasn't your favorite topic I school, was it? |
|
actually it was
and I am a member of several history sites today
I just learn real HISTORY NOT SPUN BS that you and others here push
and I was in the Gop in the 60's lived this bit of history myself I saw the racists join the Gop and I quit as a direct result
I attended segregated southern schools before integration and heard all the lies I know the racists before and after they learned to hide and claim the BS we summered in detroit and wintered in miami every year I saw both school systems and segregation in society
the dark side never can tell the truth as it will expose them for what they are
|
|

 |
|