 
     |
| Carbon dioxide hysteria (Page 44/170) |
|
Valkrie9
|
APR 07, 04:08 PM
|
|
Trojan Horse
Think of all the CO² we could prevent !
' Say, that would work on human populations too. Your political and military enemies, infected with a virus that you and your minions could grow in a lab, in, say, a city in a communist country. '
' That would be swell, we could reduce the population to like, twenty percent of the 2K census. '
Luckily, it would only be the far left end of the bell curve that gets the nix, you know, you know, the untermenschen, the radicals, and their ilk.
Sound familiar ?
It should, the same errors repeated, because of insane ideologies, repeated, doing again, expecting different results.
Think of it as a pest control applied to marxists and their collaborators, a horrific phase of an American Civil War, Parte Du, duh.
1.45 B X 0.2 = 0.29 B, a manageable size for a war.
Works on giant communist armies too, in a jiffy.
Things will get very ugly, very soon, because ' Aspirations of World Domination ', again.
Have to burn that truth into their leader's minds, again.
But then, they don't teach those truths in schools anymore.
' Politically Incorrect '
fjb for the fraud
fjb for the nuke war
|
|
|
cliffw
|
APR 07, 07:43 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
It's called "global dimming", and it had a cooling effect that effectively overcame the warming effect of carbon dioxide. |
|
What's the name of your Cult's dance ? "The Wiggle" ?
I have known about the "global dimming" step in that dance. What a mash up of steps in "the Wiggle". Global Warming became climate change, the iceberg melt became the glacier melt, flooded coastal cities became flailing crops, more severe storms, blah blah blah.
If you scroll back to various posts where I was asked you some questions, you will see that you avoided answering them.
If you would do some critical thinking on what you were told then spouted it to us, you would see the fallacies in the Global Warming fleece and the UN's International Climate Control Panel's corruption in the scam. Are you so blinded by your ideological beliefs that you can not even protect yourself ? Is your memory so short that you can not even remember the proven lies we have been told ? If someone lies to you do you always believe them again ?
Would you like some hints about the different lies we have been told. Or do you choose to ignore them for the ideological lies you are telling us ?
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
APR 07, 07:57 PM
|
|
Know how I see this entire green movement ?
If some rando puts a gun to my head, threatens me and steals my money, he is a criminal.
If the government does, it's "taxation"
If some enviro-nut does it, then it's saving the world...
I dont give a crap. I'm still sitting here with an empty wallet.
Kill 'em all. Problem solved.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
APR 07, 08:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cliffw:
What's the name of your Cult's dance ? "The Wiggle" ?
I have known about the "global dimming" step in that dance. What a mash up of steps in "the Wiggle". Global Warming became climate change, the iceberg melt became the glacier melt, flooded coastal cities became flailing crops, more severe storms, blah blah blah.
If you scroll back to various posts where I was asked you some questions, you will see that you avoided answering them.
If you would do some critical thinking on what you were told then spouted it to us, you would see the fallacies in the Global Warming fleece and the UN's International Climate Control Panel's corruption in the scam. Are you so blinded by your ideological beliefs that you can not even protect yourself ? Is your memory so short that you can not even remember the proven lies we have been told ? If someone lies to you do you always believe them again ?
Would you like some hints about the different lies we have been told. Or do you choose to ignore them for the ideological lies you are telling us ? |
|
That was unintended Global Dimming, during the years from (roughly) 1940 to 1975. The aerosol and particle emissions were just accepted as a necessary evil, until the U.S. and other Western nations realized that cleaner air was a necessity, not just a luxury, and so the era of EPA-regulated Air Quality Standards began in the U.S. and like measures were taken in the other Western nations and eventually by almost all other nations, to a certain degree—some, obviously, more than others.
When people talk about ideas like purposely seeding the atmosphere with aerosols to counteract Global Warming, they are talking about Global Dimming by design.
What else would be in that category? That "moon dust" idea that I described just a week or two back. I"m sure that "cliffw" remembers it. The idea of creating a "sun shield" for the earth by installing one or more catapult-like devices on the lunar surface to catapult lunar dust towards the Lagrange point, where the dust would orbit around the earth and block some of the sun's energy from reaching the earth.
GDD... Global Dimming by Design. I guess it's not a no-brainer. Does that make it a brainer?
|
|
|
|
cliffw
|
APR 07, 08:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
Blah blah blah ...
|
|
Wow ! I never noticed avoiding questions and concerns presented to you is a step of "The Wiggle".[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 04-07-2023).]
|
|
|
|
Fitz301
|
APR 08, 11:58 AM
|
|
"Global dimming"...? WTF?
The eco-terrorists should be more concerned with "mental dimming", from the perpetual brain fog they suffer from.
Ever notice that everything the eco-nuts post ("facts", "figures" and the made up "graphs") they claim is "science" and should be believed as the gospel truth or else, and anything that contradicts their claim, even if it's from accredited scientists and PHD holders is immediately dismissed as "lies", even if there's proof of what they claim?
Sounds like a one-sided argument to me, like everything else they "believe". That's why they must, at all costs, censor any and all opposing arguments.
And, once you realize that, then you also realize that the arguments that are "allowed" are the ones that are BS.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
APR 08, 12:28 PM
|
|
Try one of these.
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
APR 08, 12:46 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
Try one of these.
|
|
They dont really work as advertised. I've tried the whole scrying and psycomantium thing.
The demon that came out of it took one look at me, started shaking and crying and ran back into it screaming something about daddy, daddy help...
<shrug> I dunno....
|
|
|
|
cliffw
|
APR 08, 01:36 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
Try one of these.
|
|
Ah, ... the bob and weave is also a dance step of the "Wiggle".
| quote | Originally posted by Fitz301:
Ever notice that everything the eco-nuts post ("facts", "figures" and the made up "graphs") they claim is "science" and should be believed as the gospel truth or else, and anything that contradicts their claim, even if it's from accredited scientists and PHD holders is immediately dismissed as "lies", even if there's proof of what they claim? |
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fitz301:
... even if there's proof of what they claim? |
|
There never is.
Have you ever noticed that everything the Damnocrats try to claim true they dismiss if they are challenged with logic ? I guess we need to also use bullzhit figures and graphs.
Have you noticed that rinselberg dances the wiggle.
Have you ever noticed that they try to wear sane people down into believing what they claim. By repetition, over and over and over. Have you ever noticed their sheet is so weak that they need to have an echo chamber to support their bull sheet, to help sell us their bull sheet ? Have you ever noticed they do not respond to logical concerns ? Because they can not defend their bull sheet ?
If not, you have not been paying attention to rinselberg. He quit dancing with me because I dance the Logic. Never the Wiggle.
Rinseberg, may I have this dance ?
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
APR 08, 02:25 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fitz301:
"Global dimming"...? WTF? |
|
"L.A.'s Smoggy Past, in Photos"
Nathan Masters for KCET; March 17, 2011.
https://www.kcet.org/shows/...moggy-past-in-photos
If you scroll through this photo gallery, there are photos of the Los Angeles area from the 1950s and 1960s and some maybe even before that. This is what Los Angeles was like during the period from (roughly)1940 to 1975, when global temperatures were trending cooler, rather than warmer. You see the famous L.A. smog. That's the effect of aerosol and particle emissions.
I just described how aerosol and particle emissions were high during this 1940-1975 period, before the U.S. and other countries began to limit these emissions as a way to (literally) clear the air.
The geography and topography of the Los Angeles Basin created the dramatic smog episodes caused by heat inversions of the atmosphere, but all around the world, cities and the surrounding areas had air above that was hazier and less transparent because of the aerosol and particle emissions that were endemic to that time in world history.
You can look at these photographs and sense that the temperature around you (if you were there) would be somewhat lower, because of the sunlight being weaker at ground level because a certain percentage of it was being blocked from ever reaching the ground by these aerosols and particles.
That part of the sunlight was being reflected away from the ground and oceans and turned into a diffuse or indirect lighting that did not light up the ground and oceans with the same warming effect as direct or high angle sunlight... like the sun's warmth from mid-morning to mid-afternoon on a day with clear or mostly clear skies.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-08-2023).]
|
|
|
|