Carbon dioxide hysteria (Page 43/170)
Fitz301 APR 07, 09:10 AM
Nah, that's just the "people"...

Have any of you ever seen India?

If it wasn't for garbage the wouldn't have anything at all. It's one big garbage dump.

[This message has been edited by Fitz301 (edited 04-07-2023).]

cliffw APR 07, 12:23 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
... one of the things that caught my eye when I scrolled through the article: "cooling period from 1940-1975..."




quote
The globe also would not have had a thirty-five-year cooling period from 1940-1975, so significant that a dire ice age where billions would die from starvation was predicted if all the things we are told cause warming actually did. Again, it does not take any intelligence to understand that.



What are you trying to say ?
Did you look at the last sentence.


quote
Again, it does not take any intelligence to understand that.



What are you trying to say ?
That your not intelligent enough to believe what was said ?
That your Green Gawds have been wrong before ?

Did we not have a cooling period from 1940 till 1975 even though we were emitting more CO2 every year ?

Good news rinselberg, you are saved.

Climate Lock Downs are coming !

Report: World Needs Equivalent Of Pandemic Lockdown Every Two Years To Meet Paris Carbon Emission Goals

That is a hyperlink. How do you think the general masses will respond ?

I feel sad for you in that you seem to be traumatized with fear of the temperature rising 2o degrees in 100 years. Traumatized with fear that crops will cease to grow. Traumatized with fear that mankind will cease to exist. Traumatized with fear that all animals will die. Traumatized with fear that the planet will become unihabital. Traumatized with fear that coastal cities will be underwater.

I have a solution for you. Quit using fossil fuels. If all of your Cult did the same, you would be able to sleep at night knowing you made big difference in your belief in Global Warming, and that your Cult solved the demise of the planet.


quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
They're (Global Warming scientists) concerned about the elevation of sea levels that happens when ice bergs are created by calving from land-based glaciers.



I guess you haven't seen the movie [b]Inconvenient Truth . We then were bombarded with doom and gloom if the icebergs melt then coastal cities would be underwater. We were then fed the fear of the icebrgs were melting. I guess you have not considered that to go to the North Pole by submarine, it goes under a iceberg already floating in water.

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 04-07-2023).]

ray b APR 07, 12:39 PM
WHY POST BS

if the Greenland ice goes world ocean lever goes up 23 ft NASA

IF HALF THE ICE GOES

FLORIDA IS UNDER WATER [mostly]

the questions is no long IF [WE KEEP ADDING MORE co2]

it has moved to WHEN DO THE WATERS RISE

HOW SOON ???
williegoat APR 07, 12:44 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

WHY POST BS

if the Greenland ice goes world ocean lever goes up 23 ft NASA

IF HALF THE ICE GOES

FLORIDA IS UNDER WATER [mostly]

the questions is no long IF [WE KEEP ADDING MORE co2]

it has moved to WHEN DO THE WATERS RISE

HOW SOON ???


Maybe you should move to Colorado. When will Mar-a-Lago go underwater?
MidEngineManiac APR 07, 02:06 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


HOW SOON ???



Not nearly soon enough. Not even close.
ray b APR 07, 02:17 PM
BETTER LONG TERM IS LESS PEOPLE BY A LOT

but hard to do

for sure what abouting will do NOTHING
ray b APR 07, 02:18 PM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:


Not nearly soon enough. Not even close.



THE NUT-CON WILL NEVER GET IT
rinselberg APR 07, 02:51 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Did we not have a cooling period from 1940 [until] 1975, even though we were emitting more CO2 every year?


During these years, human CO2 emissions were on the "up", but so, also, human emissions of other substances that "dirtied up" the air and blocked sunlight from penetrating the atmosphere all the way down to the ground and oceans. It's called "global dimming", and it had a cooling effect that effectively overcame the warming effect of carbon dioxide.

In the years after 1975, new clean air standards for the U.S. and other Western countries began to "clear the skies" by reducing the amounts of smog-forming aerosol and particle emissions. Other countries followed the U.S. and Western Europe in reducing their aerosol and particle emissions, and as the skies around the world cleared and global dimming gave way to global brightening, the upwards trend in temperatures, fed by human carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, became the dominant trend.

If you scroll back to where I was discussing this, I provided two Internet page links for articles that explain this in more detail.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-07-2023).]

MidEngineManiac APR 07, 02:53 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


THE NUT-CON WILL NEVER GET IT



We get it just fine.

We get that the ONLY way we are ever going to take our lives and rights back, and live in some resemblance of left alone in peace, is a genocidal slaughter in size not seen since Noah floated his boat.

We get it. AND, we welcome it.
rinselberg APR 07, 03:47 PM

quote
Originally posted by Wichita:

If you notice that these leftist brainwashed pseudoscience believing cultist always use fear, often lies, to push their agenda, why would anyone take these leftist cranks seriously on the topic of climate shift?

If the anti-science response to Covid and their bigotry towards females is any tell that they are mad and thought controlled puppets, we can go back to their historical adoption of communism and fascism will give you plenty of evidence.




"Smoke 'em if you got 'em... and some have got 'em Big Time."