 
     |
| Radical leftists destroy everything they touch... (Page 4/32) |
|
fredtoast
|
AUG 03, 08:26 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
DEI is code for political classism and ideological fighting. |
|
No it isn't. That is a classic straw man argument. You can not argue against what it really is so you make up a strawman to attack.
Weak.
|
|
|
|
fredtoast
|
AUG 03, 08:30 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:
Allowed ???
Dont need their permission or consent to exclude them from my existence. By definition it is mine and they are trespassers. |
|
You are running in circles chasing your own tail. How are schools trespassing on your existence? They aren't. They have nothing to do with you. Everyone agrees you have the right to ignore them. But they are doing NOTHING to you.
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
AUG 03, 09:25 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by fredtoast:
No it isn't. That is a classic straw man argument. You can not argue against what it really is so you make up a strawman to attack.
Weak. |
|
I don't think you know what a Strawman is. This is not a strawman.
A strawman argument is if you were to tell me that you liked McDonalds, and then I was to tell you that you were a bigot because you must then hate Taco Bell, and thus all central-Americans.
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
AUG 03, 09:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
AUG 03, 10:23 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
We should give parents a choice: state controlled indoctrination or private education.
Taxes are confiscated. Vouchers would return control to the people.
Government of, by and for the people instead of in spite of the people. What a radical concept. |
|
NO your side want to steal for JESUS SCHOOLS
YOU KNOW TAXES ARE NOT TO SUPPORT RELIGION
but want a trick scam to do exactly that
we allow that BUT only if the sucker pays for the religious indoctrination themselves
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
AUG 03, 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
AUG 03, 11:40 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jdv:
[URL=https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1686768216201179136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1686768216201179136%7Ctwgr%5E0ec3f4f9f28c0c3f54069515faa8b5231909e670%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oann.com%2Fnewsroom%2Fstock s-tan]https://twitter.com/laurenb...ewsroom%2Fstocks-tan[/URL] k-after-fitch-downgrades-u-s-credit-rating%2F |
|
I am shocked too that this isn't making news... this is truly a big deal, and to be completely honest, we are totally deserving of it as well. If I was to take an unbiased view of the United States credit rating, I would list it as an A at most... possibly less. There are only two times in modern history that I would possibly view our credit rating as AAA... and that would be 1987 under Reagan, and then around 1997 under Clinton. I might even give it to Trump in 2019... just before the Pandemic. Before he passed the liberal COVID spending bill, he was actually poised to run a budget surplus for the first time since Clinton. But at that point, we still had so much insurmountable debt that I think it would be disingenuous... even if he inherited it at that point.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
AUG 03, 12:35 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I am shocked too that this isn't making news... this is truly a big deal, and to be completely honest, we are totally deserving of it as well. If I was to take an unbiased view of the United States credit rating, I would list it as an A at most... possibly less. There are only two times in modern history that I would possibly view our credit rating as AAA... and that would be 1987 under Reagan, and then around 1997 under Clinton. I might even give it to Trump in 2019... just before the Pandemic. Before he passed the liberal COVID spending bill, he was actually poised to run a budget surplus for the first time since Clinton. But at that point, we still had so much insurmountable debt that I think it would be disingenuous... even if he inherited it at that point. |
|
absolutely insane all most traitorous as the rump idea
what does replace the USD ?
putin's rubble rubles
the reds china controled yuan
saudi oil barrels giving them more power
englands depressed pounds
german marks now call euro's
every little person with a USA 100D BILL KNOWS
THAT IS THE BEST LONG TERM WORLD WIDE STASH
any one trying to change that is NOT loyal
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
AUG 03, 04:35 PM
|
|
|
Todd, you are correct that this is a big deal. Once again Joe owns this because he is pushing an agenda. Remember it's Trumps fault.
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
AUG 03, 04:40 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
absolutely insane all most traitorous as the rump idea
what does replace the USD ?
putin's rubble rubles
the reds china controled yuan
saudi oil barrels giving them more power
englands depressed pounds
german marks now call euro's
every little person with a USA 100D BILL KNOWS
THAT IS THE BEST LONG TERM WORLD WIDE STASH
any one trying to change that is NOT loyal |
|
Ray, we can blame Nixon if you want... but I think the USD should never have been taken off the gold standard. It's basically worthless... like, what makes it valuable? Because we print it?
I think the USA is awesome too... don't get me wrong, but it takes one black swan event at this point, and the world will shift to whatever currency isn't being manipulated. Obviously I don't think it's the Ruble... but I know that China has been pushing hard to either make the Yuan the next world reserve currency, or to create something else through BRICS. Even the Europeans are tired of our **** ...
|
|
|
