School shootings... what changed? (Page 32/33)
MidEngineManiac JUN 20, 10:29 PM
No matter how hard we try, we just cant get through can we Rinsey ???

Guns and swords and crossbows and bombs and airplanes and mixing bleach with ammonia to make gas are TOOLS......TOOLS. Nothing more. So are chainsaws, wood-chippers and big tanks of electric eels (as amusing as those are )...

They do nothing on their own. Not one damn thing. I have a hatchet and drywall hammer that have never in their existence gotten off the tools shelf and gone and attacked somebody....Neither have my projectile weapons.....

Tools.....I can read a magazine, or I can roll it tight and use it as a kaboton. THAT is a person's choice, not the magazines (BAN PLAYBOY !!!!!!)

Until you lefties get the idea through your head that tools are not the problem, entitled people with no self-control are.....the problem the left created...then the problem wont be fixed...

You folks are just like neandethals sacrificing sheep to a rain god, and when rain doesnt happen more sheep are needed....

Ya just cant handle thinking things through to cause and effect....Critical thinking. But yeah, thats offends them and hoooiiiissssttttsssss da feeeewwwwiiinnngggssss.

<sigh>

<edit>

Keep poking at a hibernating bear to take selfies, then get SOOOOOO scared, offended and angry when the bear wakes up mad and goes after ya. Call for banning and controlling bears. Not very bright are ya'as. Ya'all CA lefties probably shouldn't come to northern Ontario. Bears dont give a **** how scared, offended or shittin your pants you are, they only care that you bothered them when you shouldnt have. And ya went into his home to do it. That was the 1st bad idea. The stick isnt the problem. The ******* holding it is.

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 06-20-2022).]

rinselberg JUN 21, 12:21 AM
If you go with the idea that "When X (whatever that is) is criminalized, only criminals will have (or do) X," and take that to an extreme... what argument could be made for having any kind of law or government?

That's about all I can say about the previous message. The message that comes right before this one. It's extreme.
Fats JUN 21, 12:38 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

For the sake of discussion, I put aside whatever it was (specifically) that was legal for him to purchase from a firearms retailer in Pennsylvania, but not legal for him to purchase from a firearms retailer in his own state of New York. I'll just call that "X".

If there were a national law against X, he wouldn't have been able to travel to the adjacent state (Pennsylvania) or any other of the other 49 states and bring his newly and legally purchased X back with him to New York. (I think he violated New York state law when he returned to New York with X in his possession.)

He didn't get his X by pursuing it in some clandestine way in New York. He took advantage of the circumstance that he could go to Pennsylvania and buy it legally, in a straightforward, "over the counter" firearms or firearms accessory kind of transaction.

So I don't know about X. I don't even know exactly what X was. Maybe it was a larger-sized clip or magazine that New York state has put a law against. Maybe it was something else.

I wonder if any new legislation will come out of this "bi-partisan" effort among certain Democratic and Republican U.S. Senators.



You know you can buy whatever you want in New York, right? It just takes more money and isn't as easy, or legal.

Your theory is that someone willing to drive wouldn't be willing to pay more if driving doesn't work.

Let's compare this to other prohibitions. Estimates were that when the US banned alcohol sales, people started drinking more. But it was illegal everywhere... How is that possible?

War on Drugs. That's been awesome.

Fats JUN 21, 12:45 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

If you go with the idea that "When X (whatever that is) is criminalized, only criminals will have (or do) X," and take that to an extreme... what argument could be made for having any kind of law or government?

That's about all I can say about the previous message. The message that comes right before this one. It's extreme.



It's not an extreme. People that are "law-abiding" by definition follow the law. People who break the law don't follow the law. Slippery slopes are real. I could go off on a rant about pedos and the warnings the Right gave years ago when probably you defended gay marriage and we said it would lead to diddling little kids... And here we are.

Disarming the US is just a way of getting us to a Communist "utopia".
MidEngineManiac JUN 21, 12:58 AM

quote
Originally posted by Fats:


It's not an extreme. People that are "law-abiding" by definition follow the law. People who break the law don't follow the law. Slippery slopes are real. I could go off on a rant about pedos and the warnings the Right gave years ago when probably you defended gay marriage and we said it would lead to diddling little kids... And here we are.

Disarming the US is just a way of getting us to a Communist "utopia".



"Law abiding" are the the controlled ones....licking the masters hand like a dog for permission to live....OH, look at me, I licked your ass and gave you 900 dollua....do I have a licence for a dog now....????

Free men dont ask, and dont need permission,

If you pay tax on a roll of toilet paper, and ask permission to take a **** .......

then on the most basic level, you are not free.....

A bear can **** in the woods and wipe his ass with a rabbit without problems....the bear is free. Can you do the same, without cops shooting at you ????

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 06-21-2022).]

MidEngineManiac JUN 21, 01:31 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED




What part are you too stupid to understand ???

(not you, dude....them...)

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 06-21-2022).]

MidEngineManiac JUN 21, 02:35 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

Joe,
Some will never agree on the intent of the 2nd Amendment. Some don't deserve the freedoms and guarantees the Constitution provides.

Rams




Excuse me ??? RON, the entire idea was it apples to everbody equally....

Not just those the government decides who can be armed....like when the government can use lawyers and "laws" to shoot at those who throw 20=puond bags f tea into a party ??

5 pounds of tea costs 6 bucks...wanna play those games again....
Some will cower and hide while others do stand up. Figuring out who, well that's the easy part.

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 06-21-2022).]

2.5 JUN 22, 11:22 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

If I were responsible for titularizing ...



Trying to distract people with words. lol
2.5 JUN 22, 11:24 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

If you go with the idea that "When X (whatever that is) is criminalized, only criminals will have (or do) X," and take that to an extreme... what argument could be made for having any kind of law or government?

.



You are conflating things.
The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed.
MidEngineManiac JUN 22, 09:18 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


You are conflating things.
The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed.



Agreed whole-heartedly.

The only reason people dont want you(us) armed, is because they are planning on doing things they know damn well would get them shot.

Attention libs.....

Nope, you aint "safe" here in my home, this isnt a safe-space. It's a redneck free-speech and free thought zone. You will encounter words, beer, black coffee, rebel flags, country music, weapons, and a whole lot of other things you dont like. It's my home, not yours. Your consent or approval is neither sought, nor required. The door works 2 ways, and if you dont like free speech then you can apply your own standard to yourself, shut your mouth, and get the **** out. Or be removed. Your choice.

Oh, your offended...good, find a complaints department somewhere. I don't work in one.

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 06-22-2022).]