 
     |
| Why Alito must recuse himself from cases involving Donald Trump. (Page 3/7) |
|
randye
|
JUN 01, 02:22 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
Ever heard of "checks and balances". Roberts can be impeached by congress if he keeps insisting that the Supreme Court answers to no one.
|
|
Got the votes Leftoid?[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-01-2024).]
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JUN 01, 03:15 PM
|
|
Congress can't directly impeach an Article III judge.
It requires a recommendation from the Judicial Conference.
Guess who heads the Judicial Conferance and who the members are.....[This message has been edited by olejoedad (edited 06-01-2024).]
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JUN 01, 09:45 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Congress can't directly impeach an Article III judge.
It requires a recommendation from the Judicial Conference.
Guess who heads the Judicial Conferance and who the members are.....
|
|
Defined in: 28 USC ยง331, Judicial Conference of the United States
We can just imagine fredBing's, childlike, wide eyed wonderment when confronted with the fact that neither Chief Justice Roberts nor any of the Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court answer solely to the Demorat party......(with the obvious exceptions of Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.)
Leftists gotta Leftist
....because American civics is too hard for them[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-01-2024).]
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JUN 02, 07:37 AM
|
|
Yeah, coming from a teacher of History, I was somewhat amused by his ignorance of the subject.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JUN 02, 10:22 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Congress can't directly impeach an Article III judge.
It requires a recommendation from the Judicial Conference.
|
|
No it doesn't. What makes you think this? I don't see anything in the law that says this.
It would not be a "check" on the power of the legislative branch if the legislative branch controlled its own power to impeach.
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JUN 02, 10:41 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
No it doesn't. What makes you think this? I don't see anything in the law that says this.
It would not be a "check" on the power of the legislative branch if the legislative branch controlled its own power to impeach.
|
|
You should research the topic more thoroughly.
Maybe you should employ the Socratic method
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JUN 02, 10:46 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
You should research the topic more thoroughly.
Maybe you should employ the Socratic method |
|
I researched it very thoroughly. I found nothing.
Is this going to be another one of those little games where you guys say something make-believe and then refuse to post any source to support it?
Do you all have no shame? Don't you realize how silly that makes you all look?
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JUN 02, 11:10 AM
|
|
Reading and research evidently is not one of your strong points.
It has been posted.
'So easy, even a caveman can do it'
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JUN 02, 12:44 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Reading and research evidently is not one of your strong points.
It has been posted.
'So easy, even a caveman can do it' |
|
No it has not been posted.
Do you understand what "checks and balances" means? How can impeachment of a justice be a "check" on power if the Justice determine who can be impeached. Simple common logic should tell you that what you are claiming is false.
I didn't think Christians were supposed to lie.[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 06-02-2024).]
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JUN 02, 12:46 PM
|
|
|
You're reading comprehension skills are lacking if you don't see the information
|
|
|
