For Rinse... we won't need to eat the bugs... (Page 3/3)
rinselberg OCT 24, 12:29 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I guess he assumed my intent in the original post was non-genuine.


What makes you think that?

I haven't hailed this research report about converting CO2 into a digestible product (starch) as a "game changer" because I've seen a lot of other reports of this kind over the years.

I await future developments.
williegoat OCT 24, 12:41 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

What makes you think that?

I haven't hailed this research report about converting CO2 into a digestible product (starch) as a "game changer" because I've seen a lot of other reports of this kind over the years.

I await future developments.


You could make chemoenzymatic buns for your Impossible Burgers.

olejoedad OCT 24, 12:50 PM
Which of the two gases, methane or CO2, has more power to trap heat in the atmosphere, on a pound per pound basis?

[This message has been edited by olejoedad (edited 10-24-2023).]

82-T/A [At Work] OCT 24, 01:09 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

What makes you think that?

I haven't hailed this research report about converting CO2 into a digestible product (starch) as a "game changer" because I've seen a lot of other reports of this kind over the years.

I await future developments.




When someone says, "Hey Rinse..." and then shares some information with you, usually there's a response back... haha, just saying... normal flow of conversation.

It would be like if I walked up to you and struck up a conversation with you, and you stared blindly at me, and then as soon as a third person walked up, you start arguing with that person... hahah...

williegoat OCT 24, 01:10 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

Which of the two gases, methane or CO2, has more power to trap heat in the atmosphere, on anoound per pound basis?


The way I understand it, CO2 contributes more than CH4 to the greenhouse effect only because it is more plentiful. However, neither can hold a candle to good ol’ H2O.

I propose that we outlaw water. It kills more than 200,000 people each year.
rinselberg OCT 24, 01:45 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
When someone says, "Hey Rinse..." and then shares some information with you, usually there's a response back... haha, just saying... normal flow of conversation.

It would be like if I walked up to you and struck up a conversation with you, and you stared blindly at me, and then as soon as a third person walked up, you start arguing with that person... hahah...


Whatever else could be said, the way that you set up this topic ,"For Rinse... we won't need to eat the bugs...," reminded me of Wichita.

It reminded me of what used to be his "harping" on Greta Thunberg, as if Greta Thunberg were the totality—the "A to Z"as it were—of the global conversation about climate.

It reminded me of a plethora of Greta Thunberg "Eat Ze Bugs!" memes that were posted on this forum.

That was tiresome to witness.

But if I had chosen to say anything as soon as I saw this topic, I would have said (in so many words) that it was an interesting new report, but too early to hail it as a "game changer" or anything of that kind. I did scroll through the report.

I think I saw right away that your new topic had already garnered some Reply messages, so I didn't feel there was a particular onus on me to respond.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 10-24-2023).]

82-T/A [At Work] OCT 24, 02:27 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

Whatever else could be said, the way that you set up this topic ,"For Rinse... we won't need to eat the bugs...," reminded me of Wichita.

It reminded me of what used to be his "harping" on Greta Thunberg, as if Greta Thunberg were the totality—the "A to Z"as it were—of the global conversation about climate.

It reminded me of a plethora of Greta Thunberg "Eat Ze Bugs!" memes that were posted on this forum.

That was tiresome to witness.

But if I had chosen to say anything as soon as I saw this topic, I would have said (in so many words) that it was an interesting new report, but too early to hail it as a "game changer" or anything of that kind. I did scroll through the report.

I think I saw right away that your new topic had already garnered some Reply messages, so I didn't feel there was a particular onus on me to respond.







I'm all about genuine solutions. I assumed you misinterpreted my intentions. It's OK for me to make fun of "Eat ze bugs!" hahah...
cliffw OCT 25, 08:54 AM
.

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 10-25-2023).]

cliffw OCT 25, 08:55 AM

quote
Originally posted by williegoat:
The way I understand it, CO2 contributes more than CH4 to the greenhouse effect only because it is more plentiful.



hmm, ze bugs produce methane too, .