1 in 310. That's your odds. (Page 3/4)
Jake_Dragon APR 02, 02:35 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

What do you know about it?



kook
noun
ˈkük
Synonyms of kook
: one whose ideas or actions are eccentric, fantastic, or insane : SCREWBALL

Or were you asking about something else?
rinselberg APR 02, 03:06 PM
Have you read through the thread?


quote
The leftists are protecting themselves from this disaster, as they had everything to do with it. They refuse to investigate the origins (to this day there is no scientific studies on pre-print or peer review studies), yet the leftist narrative is still trying to say it is a wet market natural zoonotic virus (which everyone knows is a lie).



What's your take on these remarks? I've called this a lie because I documented some of the scientific studies on the origin(s) of the Covid pandemic that according to these remarks, do not exist. Am I misunderstanding what was said here?

I'm not usually one for strongly derogatory language, so if I call it a "lie", you can be assured that I am excited (in a negative way) about these remarks.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-02-2023).]

rinselberg APR 07, 11:19 AM
Prologue

quote
The leftists are protecting themselves from this disaster, as they had everything to do with it. They refuse to investigate the origins (to this day there is no scientific studies on pre-print or peer review studies), yet the leftist narrative is still trying to say it is a wet market natural zoonotic virus (which everyone knows is a lie).



The best available scientific evidence kicks the "lab leak" origin theory in the proverbial "Aspercreme"

quote
There is ample precedent for the seeding of pandemics and more geographically limited outbreaks from nonhuman species. Common-cold CoVs, SARS-CoV, Ebola virus, HIV, influenza A virus, mpox virus, and others all have zoonotic origins. SARS-CoV-2 is the ninth documented coronavirus to enter the human population. The best existing scientific evidence supports a direct zoonotic origin. As new evidence continues to emerge from scientific studies or other investigations, our understanding of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 will continue to evolve. Nevertheless, it is possible that its origin may never be known with certainty.


This newly published editorial appeared on March 28, 2023, in the American Society for Microbiology's Journal of Virology. The lead author is James C. Alwine, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Cancer Biology at the University of Pennsylvania.

"A Critical Analysis of the Evidence for the SARS-CoV-2 Origin Hypotheses"
James C. Alwine, et al.; ASM Journal of Virology; March 28, 2023.
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.00365-23


[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-07-2023).]

MidEngineManiac APR 07, 12:32 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:







Your going to need truckloads of that butt-hurt creme to distribute to all the vaxxers and maskers who are still crying about being told to eff off.
rinselberg APR 08, 10:05 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:

[Second] link is the same damn author and the same damn paper... so much for the [second] bit of wild hyperbolic BS... **DOUBLE SNERK**

ANYONE WANT TO BET WHAT THE FIRST PAPER AND AUTHOR IS ON THE 3rd BS LINK???

LEFTOIDS: ITCDYWB,TTTBYWB


In case anyone is actually reading any of this stuff, I want to expose the total idiocy of this "parrot drop" from... well, you can see who it's from.

We had this remarkable assertion from forum member Wichita:

quote
The leftists are protecting themselves from this disaster, as they had everything to do with it. They refuse to investigate the origins (to this day there is no scientific studies on pre-print or peer review studies), yet the leftist narrative is still trying to say it is a wet market natural zoonotic virus (which everyone knows is a lie).


I knew that could not be factual. I knew that there have been scientific reports on the Covid origin(s) that have been published in specialists' journals. So I posted these links to Internet pages that anyone could look at, to see with their own eyes that what Wichita said was not true.
  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00827-2
  2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36944776/
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih...ed&from_uid=36944776

Going to the last of these 3 Internet page links, there is a catalog of all of the specialists' journal articles that were called up by my search parameters. There are more than 100 such articles, and the catalog itself is 11 pages. This is the first page:

Show me the first page

So if you just had a look, what you have seen is 10 articles in the specialist journals about the origin(s) of Covid-19. The first one listed is the recently published "Raccoon Dogs" report, and then there are 9 more articles of this kind. Of the 10 articles, 8 were published in the journal Nature, 1 was published in Science and 1 was published in the Journal of Medical Virology.

That's just the first page of this 11-page catalog. The second page is similar. I see 10 more journal articles, and 6 of them, judging by the titles, are research into the origin(s) of Covid-19. Page 3... 4 more articles for sure, and possibly 1 or 2 more, depending on what you make of the titles and whether they look like articles that are about the origin(s) of Covid-19, or just articles that are about some other aspect of Covid-19 or about other coronaviruses. I see at least 2 more "origins" articles on page 4 of this catalog. So that's at least 22 of these "Covid-19 origins" articles in specialist journals, and I haven't even gone all the way through the entire catalog that I produced with my search parameters.

That's enough evidence for me to say that the assertion from Wichita does not hold up. Wichita's assertion is that there are no such articles, and yet, I just found 22 such articles with an online search.

So, an assertion from Wichita is shown to be a false assertion, and an assertion from that other forum member, examined and revealed to be exactly the childish babble that it looks like from the "get-go".

Can anyone say otherwise?

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 04-08-2023).]

rinselberg APR 10, 07:15 AM
Woman with Long Covid finally wakes up and (literally) smells the coffee

quote
A woman who lost her sense of smell and taste due to [what is attributed to] "long" COVID [was able] to [savor] coffee again for the first time in [the last] 2 years .The woman underwent an experimental treatment involving pain-killer injections.


brief YouTube video clip
https://youtu.be/ZIc9hU76oz4

Will any of the forum members who have engaged in nonsensical remarks in this thread "wake up and smell the coffee"..? Nonsensical remarks like the remarks I singled out in the message on this thread that immediately precedes this one.

Update on XBB.1.16... the new Covid "kid" on the block. But don't "sleep" on XBB.1.9.1.
https://abcnews.go.com/Heal...ia/story?id=98405058
rinselberg APR 15, 12:03 PM

quote
The leftists are protecting themselves from this disaster, as they had everything to do with it. They refuse to investigate the origins (to this day there is no scientific studies on pre-print or peer review studies), yet the leftist narrative is still trying to say it is a wet market natural zoonotic virus (which everyone knows is a lie).


Just another reminder that I demolished this misleading assertion, which was part of the first Reply in this thread.

But here's something about Covid that you probably do not already know:
Show me what I don't know about Covid

This online page from the National Institutes of Health, where "Fauci" rose to worldwide fame:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coronavirus/

It's a convenient way to search for actual research reports about Covid in the specialist's journals, like Nature, or the Journal of Virology.

To demolish the misleading assertion that I quoted at the beginning of this post, I could use the "Magnifying Glass" search field at the top of this page, entering words and phrases that are relevant to scientific study of the origins of Covid, such as: "zoonotic", "lab leak", "bat species", "wet market", or "Gain of Function"—and so also, could you.

This demolishes the misleading assertion that I quoted at the beginning of this post, by revealing the published scientific research into the origin(s) of Covid that the misleading assertion that I quoted at the beginning of this post misleadingly asserts does not exist, because of the "leftists".

If this published research does not exist, how could it be revealed in this manner?

Think about it.
rinselberg MAY 30, 01:34 AM

quote
Originally posted by Wichita:

We may never really get under the hood to really see what was really involved, swept under, conspired in this whole human tragedy of humanity.

. . .


"Covid: Top Chinese scientist says don’t rule out lab leak"
John Sudworth and Simon Maybin for BBC News; May 30, 2023.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-65708746

A "rinse-recommended read."

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 05-30-2023).]

Wichita MAY 30, 04:40 AM
The coersive Covid policies that forced an experiment on healthy people and children by threatening their employment, freezing bank accounts, denying services and etc that were enacted gleefully by leftists is one of the shames of our modern era.

These leftists violated the Nuremberg Code. Remember that we tried doctors in a separate trial of their own in Nuremberg, for which 7 were hanged and 9 were sent to prison for crimes against humanity for doing exactly what Fauci and leftist employees of the WHO, NIH, CDC and leftist government politicians did. They forced people to take a medical experiment without proper protocols and illegally gave immunity to pharmaceutical companies who raped the taxpayers of many billions of dollars while gaslighting people, hiding the harms and out right lying on the data.

We will look back at this as the Tuskegee Experiment of our times and we should never forgive the leftists for their crimes against humanity.
ray b MAY 30, 11:54 AM
the trump shot/jab/vax not joe's

there were no libs just medical officials and a rump who paid for it

what libs were in charge under the rump reich ?

if you must attack the life saving vax
you need to admit it was the orange ones vax

yes there were MINOR side effects
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/vo...s/72/wr/mm7206a3.htm



but still 5 times more unvaxed DIED then the people who got two shots
and the 3 or 4 shot has far less death then the 2 shot group

my history is I have had cv-19 twice one before and one after 2 vax shots
the difference was a very bad case 3 weeks in bed lost 25lbs off 150 start
vs after 2 shots I have had worse colds

anti-vax is nuts

my new puppy gets all her shots cv-19 is in the mix now even for dogs

remember 5 times the risk for the unjabbed OF DEATH is REAL

[This message has been edited by ray b (edited 05-30-2023).]