Abortion thread (Page 3/43)
ray b MAR 29, 01:42 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


This stretch is silly to me. Life begins at conception, scientists can figure that out. Periods waste eggs by apparent design.

Related to as you said the Christian opinion : Doesn't it seem like the argument that we don't need a foundation to be "moral" people crumbles when we see that we are ok with dismembering our own offspring in the womb when we decide what we feel is right based simply on public opinion?




look up onan

there have been laws in the home of the free forbidding any birth control devices
AND EVEN TEACHING ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL

WHY DO YOU THINK IT IS OK TO IMPOSE YOUR MORALITY ON OTHERS
MidEngineManiac MAR 29, 01:52 PM

quote
Originally posted by randye:


Almost ALL of our laws are based on the bedrock of Judeo-Christian teachings.




And THERE is the main problem with humans and "society'.

Each and every religion is DETERMINED, one way or another, using whatever means required, to force the entire global population to live as "they" think is right and to think the way they do.

As with most things in life, it really isnt about "abortion". It's about power and control. Abortion simply happens to be the means of the moment, and will be replaced with something else later on. Like always.
2.5 MAR 29, 02:02 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


look up onan

there have been laws in the home of the free forbidding any birth control devices
AND EVEN TEACHING ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL

WHY DO YOU THINK IT IS OK TO IMPOSE YOUR MORALITY ON OTHERS



Irrelevant re read my post.
2.5 MAR 29, 02:06 PM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:

Each and every religion is DETERMINED, one way or another, using whatever means required, to force the entire global population to live as "they" think is right and to think the way they do.

As with most things in life, it really isnt about "abortion". It's about power and control. Abortion simply happens to be the means of the moment, and will be replaced with something else later on. Like always.



Wrong, context matters. Later down the road would it be ok to kill if they are less than 1 year old (12 months outside the womb)? 1 month? Maybe the elderly, if public opinion says thats what we feel like?
MidEngineManiac MAR 29, 02:17 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


Wrong, context matters. Later down the road would it be ok to kill if they are less than 1 year old (12 months outside the womb)? 1 month? Maybe the elderly, if public opinion says thats what we feel like?



Or Commie....Or Alcada...or Taliban.....or Nazi.....or Jap.....or....or.....or....

Killing is nothing new. It's just a matter of who is expedient and acceptable at the particular time and place. And to who.
ray b MAR 29, 03:31 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


Wrong, context matters. Later down the road would it be ok to kill if they are less than 1 year old (12 months outside the womb)? 1 month? Maybe the elderly, if public opinion says thats what we feel like?



UNDER ROMAN LAW
the father could kill any member of his family
inc an adult son as there is a famous story about that

that was moral under their rules

point being morals change

greeks exposed kids if ...
Fats MAR 29, 04:14 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


look up onan

there have been laws in the home of the free forbidding any birth control devices
AND EVEN TEACHING ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL

WHY DO YOU THINK IT IS OK TO IMPOSE YOUR MORALITY ON OTHERS



Why do you think it's OK to impose YOUR morality on others?
2.5 MAR 29, 05:24 PM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:


Or Commie....Or Alcada...or Taliban.....or Nazi.....or Jap.....or....or.....or....

Killing is nothing new. It's just a matter of who is expedient and acceptable at the particular time and place. And to who.



Sure I was asking what you think though.
2.5 MAR 29, 05:25 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

point being morals change




My point as well.
MidEngineManiac MAR 29, 05:45 PM

quote
Originally posted by 2.5:


Sure I was asking what you think though.



I really dont care either way, I'm not female.

BUT---it seems to me banning it might be a good idea simply to equalize the power dynamic. Right now basically women hold financial slavery power over men. THEIR choice but if they choose to keep it males get to pay for that choice.

So by taking the "choice" away from them, it might smarten them up a little (I doubt it ). See how THEY like forced slavery when "choice" is taken away from them.

(Yeh, I'm not much of a fan of feminazism.)

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 03-29-2022).]