 
     |
| TRUMP 2024 (Page 29/59) |
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 04, 03:00 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
Sorry [BingB], I don't engage in hypothetical question circle jerks with Leftoids.
Additionally, I never allow a Leftoid to frame the question or set the premise. You are invariably dishonest. |
|
Are these remarks from randye like the sight and sound of someone childishly sucking their thumb? (I guess that's redundant, unless there's an adult way of sucking one's thumb.)
Are these remarks from randye the pettiness and petulance of randye doing the "take his ball and go home" thing, because randye has encountered someone with a different opinion than randye's, or someone who isn't ready to agree with what randye is saying?
One thing these remarks are not: the remarks of someone who is open to any kind of substantive and mannered or civil discussion.
Here are three articles I quickly found online that connect Trump with Keynesian economic theory:
"Call Trump’s tax cut what it was: Keynesian"
David J. Berger for The Hill; May 9, 2019.
https://thehill.com/opinion...at-it-was-keynesian/
"Even Trump Is a Keynesian"
Noah Smith for Bloomberg; November 18, 2016.
https://www.bloomberg.com/v...trump-is-a-keynesian
"The Growing Fiscal Deficit, the Keynesian Stimulus Policies of Trump, and the FY20/21 Budget Agreement"
An Economic Sense; August 9, 2019.
https://aneconomicsense.org...21-budget-agreement/
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
All I am pointing out is that Trump cut taxes and raised federal spending.
What would a person who "worships at the feet of John Maynard Keynes" say about that?
Do you even know? |
|
These remarks from BingB were greeted with the customary churlish and childish derision from randye and olejoedad—olejoedad to a lesser extent, perhaps—but in light of these articles that I've just found online, connecting Trump with Keynesian economic theory, I think the derision is because randye and olejoedad think they are on solid ground with their ideas in this discussion, when they are not. Their customary churlishness and childishness is an ill-mannered manifestation of their hubris.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-04-2024).]
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
FEB 04, 11:49 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
Sorry, I don't engage in hypothetical question circle jerks with Leftoids.
Additionally, I never allow a Leftoid to frame the question or set the premise. You are invariably dishonest.
|
|
Okay, sorrry. No more questions. Just a comment.
Trump used the Keynesian policy of cutting taxes and increasing federal spending to stimulate economic growth.
So you can either run away and ignore this or respond how ever you chose. But at least you don't have to be afraid of answering any questions that are too "dishonest" for you.
|
|
|
|
Raydar
|
FEB 04, 12:12 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Raydar:
If it comes down to Trump and Biden (or "Cackles", for that matter), Trump is going to clean house.
If it's Trump against anyone "sane and capable", he might not. "Sane and capable" does not include Gavin Newsom, but does include RFK, IMHO. Some may take issue. 
It's probably the best opportunity for a 3rd party candidate or independent that we've seen in a long time.
|
|
I'll just leave this here...
"Democratic and Republican elites fear RFK Jr.’s growing path to victory"
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
FEB 04, 12:39 PM
|
|
I pray for a legitimate third party candidate, but Kennedy isn't it. He is just dragging the bottom of the barrel to dredge up the conspiracy theorist vote. First it was the anti-vaccine crowd. Now he is working the anti wi-fi radiation crowd.
Third party is what is needed to save this country, but there just are not any viable candidates or parties.
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
FEB 04, 02:12 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
I pray for a legitimate third party candidate, but Kennedy isn't it. He is just dragging the bottom of the barrel to dredge up the conspiracy theorist vote. First it was the anti-vaccine crowd. Now he is working the anti wi-fi radiation crowd.
Third party is what is needed to save this country, but there just are not any viable candidates or parties. |
|
Gee whiz, Bing, why don't you throw your hat into the ring?
You've convinced all of us of your qualifications for high office.
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
FEB 04, 02:21 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
rinse, I can't see you tearing yourself away from your keyboard long enough to socialize with anyone but your brother. |
|
As an adherent of Kemetic Orthodoxy—a modern version of the religion of pharaonic Egypt—I hope to be favored in the afterlife by the deity Seshat, who is often encapsulated as the Goddess of Writing.
Seshat is the figure on the right in this temple inscription from the Early Dynastic Period.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
FEB 04, 02:45 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
So you get your copy & paste propaganda from some chucklehead using the name "badlatitude" on your "Sailing Anarchy" website and to top it off "badlatitude's" post is a copy & paste of a Twatter post by some Demorat House Rep from Illinois....
No wonder your posts are chock full of whackadoodle nonsense. |
|
why are the very people
the best people the rump could find to put in office to do his program ''MAGA'' BS
all now say the rump is a threat to our freedoms ?
his personal lawdog to his att general even the kraken now hate him
ever wonder why or is the CULT TOO STRONG ?
WHAT % OF THE TRUMP APPOINTED PEOPLE LASTED HIS FULL TERM
lots of burn and churn there
and most now no longer support the rump
U N had 3
att G had 2 +3 temps
state had 2
epa had 2
cia had 2
sm biz had 2
m/b had 2
nsa had 2
homeland had 3
energy had 2
int had 2
only the totally NUTS like bitty deVos or purdue or ross or carson
stayed the whole term
|
|
|
|
randye
|
FEB 04, 11:03 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
his usual unintelligible, illiterate, ranting
|
|
In Antarctica there are 21 million penguins and in Malta there are 502,653 inhabitants.
So if the penguins decide to invade Malta, each Maltese citizen will have to fight an average of 42 penguins.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
FEB 05, 12:15 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
quote
Originally posted by ray b:
AN ON POINT POST randye CAN NOT OR WILL NOT ANSWER
SO HE DISHONESTLY CHANGES WHAT I WROTE
THEN
his usual unintelligible, illiterate, ranting
|
|
reality
WHEN THE RUMP LIES PANTS ON FIRE % 18.4
NORMAL LIES % 37.7
SEMI ;LIES % 19.5
HALF TRUE % 12.3
MOSTLY TRUE % 8.5
TRUTH - % 3.6
OR 1/4 OR LESS SOME TRUTH
3/4 LIES
https://twitter.com/SethAbr...twcon%5Es1_&ref_url=
SO THE USUAL bs from the cult
“He didn’t say that. If he did say that, he didn’t mean it. If he meant it, you don’t understand what he means. Stop trying to attack him by quoting what he says. And, even if he did say those things,
ANY LIB would have been FAR worse!”[This message has been edited by ray b (edited 02-05-2024).]
|
|
|
|
Valkrie9
|
FEB 05, 01:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|