TRUMP 2024 (Page 28/59)
olejoedad FEB 03, 09:38 AM

quote
Originally posted by BingB:

All I am pointing out is that Trump cut taxes and raised federal spending.

What would a person who "worships at the feet of John Maynard Keynes" say about that?

Do you even know?



It sad to think about how outclassed you are on this Forum.
Keep on keeping on if you must, we find it immensely entertaining.
Pitiful, but entertaining nonetheless.
BingB FEB 03, 10:12 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:
It sad to think about how outclassed you are on this Forum.
Keep on keeping on if you must, we find it immensely entertaining.
Pitiful, but entertaining nonetheless.




So you also don't get the point that Trump was lock step with Keynesian economic theory of lowering taxes and increasing government spending?

The numbers prove I am right. Do you want to discuss them. Or are you limited to just personal attacks?

[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 02-03-2024).]

rinselberg FEB 03, 10:17 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:
It's sad to think about how outclassed you are on this forum. Keep on keeping on if you must, we find it immensely entertaining. Pitiful, but entertaining nonetheless.


That—very unfortunately—is "randye-esque." The attitude of talking down to someone from a higher level, but without anything specific to establish a higher level. The childish assertion of the "Royal We," in which olejoedad indulges the fantasy that he's like a spokesman for some group, instead of just another forum member. The condescending but not very credible assertion that olejoedad's thinking is so elevated that anyone who presents a different view—in this case, BingB—can only be dissed as "entertaining."

Psychologists call this "Swollen Head Syndrome" and sometimes, the "Popsicle Stick Up One's Ass" phenomenon.

Economics? Not my strong suit. This is about the best that I can do: Copy and Paste!

quote
  • New Keynesian economics is a modern twist on the macroeconomic doctrine that evolved from classical Keynesian economics principles.
  • Economists [argue] that prices and wages are “sticky," causing involuntary unemployment and monetary policy to have a big impact on the economy.
  • This way of thinking became the dominant force in academic macroeconomics from the 1990s through to the financial crisis of 2008.


These bullet points are from a very brief and recent article.

"New Keynesian Economics: Definition and Vs. Keynesian"
Daniel Liberto for Investopedia:October 20, 2023.
https://www.investopedia.co...nesian-economics.asp

I'm waiting for my next opportunity to attend a cocktail party and open up to someone with "I've always been a disciple of Milton Friedman. Lately, I've become conspicuously 'New Keynesian'..."

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 02-03-2024).]

olejoedad FEB 03, 10:40 AM
rinse, I can't see you tearing yourself away from your keyboard long enough to socialize with anyone but your brother.

BingB, I don't think that your argument about DJT holds water at all. I think you are full of BS.
blackrams FEB 03, 11:28 AM
While being a fan of a balanced budget, there are times a deficit is justified. But, for me it depends on what the excessive spending is going toward. The funds currently being expended for Biden's immigration effort seems to be way out of line to me and costing the American taxpayer so the Dems can eventually gain millions of friendly votes. Buying votes goes against my whole character values.

Showing what the last two years of Biden's or Obama's expenditures versus Trump's would be worth knowing.

Rams
ray b FEB 03, 04:11 PM
lets do jobs first

Since 1989, there have been 6 Presidents: 3 R and 3 D. We've created over 50 million jobs during that period. 49 million of them were created under Democratic Presidents. That's not a coincidence.

https://forums.sailinganarc...anuary.240754/page-5
Patrick FEB 03, 05:21 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

That—very unfortunately—is "randye-esque." The attitude of talking down to someone from a higher level, but without anything specific to establish a higher level. The childish assertion of the "Royal We," in which olejoedad indulges the fantasy that he's like a spokesman for some group, instead of just another forum member. The condescending but not very credible assertion that olejoedad's thinking is so elevated that anyone who presents a different view—in this case, BingB—can only be dissed as "entertaining."



Yep, this has been the modus operandi of the usual suspects here for years. It's a self-defense mechanism they employ when faced with a challenge to their narrow-minded beliefs. Just be grateful that they're only names on a screen and not your next door neighbor.
randye FEB 03, 11:01 PM

quote
Originally posted by BingB:

All I am pointing out is that Trump cut taxes and raised federal spending.

What would a person who "worships at the feet of John Maynard Keynes" say about that?

Do you even know?





Sorry, I don't engage in hypothetical question circle jerks with Leftoids.

Additionally, I never allow a Leftoid to frame the question or set the premise. You are invariably dishonest.
Patrick FEB 04, 02:01 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:

Sorry, I don't engage in hypothetical question circle jerks with Leftoids.



It's no surprise that your preference is engaging in circle jerks with other RWNJs.
randye FEB 04, 02:01 AM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

lets do jobs first

Since 1989, there have been 6 Presidents: 3 R and 3 D. We've created over 50 million jobs during that period. 49 million of them were created under Democratic Presidents. That's not a coincidence.

https://forums.sailinganarc...anuary.240754/page-5





So you get your copy & paste propaganda from some chucklehead using the name "badlatitude" on your "Sailing Anarchy" website and to top it off "badlatitude's" post is a copy & paste of a Twatter post by some Demorat House Rep from Illinois....

No wonder your posts are chock full of whackadoodle nonsense.