Abortion thread (Page 28/43)
ray b MAY 04, 05:33 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

Of course you don't.

Electoral College, as defined in the Constitution, elects the President, and is nothing new.

The Supreme Court decided Bush v Gore.

I won't even address the rest of your rant.

Your bias and dearth of knowledge of history is on display.

Edited for spelling.




yes my bias is one man one vote
all count the same EVERYWHERE

NO realestate votes just people
and dred scott 3/5's and jim crow are states rights that were and are WRONG

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

randye MAY 04, 05:36 PM

quote
Originally posted by Raydar:


Are you suggesting that this might be a "false flag"? If so, that's kind of my thought.

The general consensus is that the Dems are going to take a shellacking in the mid-terms. Might this "leak" just be a ploy to energize them, and maybe to minimize their losses?
Wouldn't surprise me a bit.




Not sure what you mean by this being a "false flag".

The leak did indeed happen and Chief Justice Roberts confirmed it yesterday.

He also directed the Marshall of the Court to investigate to find the leaker.

I firmly believe that it was an activist law clerk and he or she will be, at a minimum, ushered out of the Supreme Court and disbarred for life from practicing law and will forever be a pariah in the legal community......which of course makes them a prime candidate scumbag to be employed by MSNBC or CNN

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-04-2022).]

olejoedad MAY 04, 06:27 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


yes my bias is one man one vote
all count the same EVERYWHERE

NO realestate votes just people
and dred scott 3/5's and jim crow are states rights that were and are WRONG





Perhaps you should find another country to live in then, as the People have never elected the President directly by popular vote. Brush up (or maybe read for the first time) on the written arguments by the Founding Fathers concerning the establishment of the Electoral College and the safeguards it builds in to our process.

Jim Crow and the 3/5's?
Oh, I agree, but did you know that both those were due to the Democratic slave holders wanting to strip rights from the freed slaves (Jim Crow laws) and Democratic slave holders wanting to count slaves as whole persons in the population of their states (even though the slaves had no vote at the time) in order to get more seats in the House of Representatives. The 3/5ths Compromise prevented over representation by the South.

Both of your examples are Democrat dirty tricks from ages ago, as are your examples from earlier posts.

If you're gonna express your arguments, you should have some facts behind your arguments - not the disinformation you have been fed from where ever you get it from.

Have you ever taken a History class?
ray b MAY 04, 07:05 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


Perhaps you should find another country to live in then, as the People have never elected the President directly by popular vote. Brush up (or maybe read for the first time) on the written arguments by the Founding Fathers concerning the establishment of the Electoral College and the safeguards it builds in to our process.

Jim Crow and the 3/5's?
Oh, I agree, but did you know that both those were due to the Democratic slave holders wanting to strip rights from the freed slaves (Jim Crow laws) and Democratic slave holders wanting to count slaves as whole persons in the population of their states (even though the slaves had no vote at the time) in order to get more seats in the House of Representatives. The 3/5ths Compromise prevented over representation by the South.

Both of your examples are Democrat dirty tricks from ages ago, as are your examples from earlier posts.

If you're gonna express your arguments, you should have some facts behind your arguments - not the disinformation you have been fed from where ever you get it from.

Have you ever taken a History class?



WHY IS IT EVERY CON WHO TRYS THE GOP TALKING POINTS OF THE MYTH

and try to blame the democratic party forgets totally
all those bygone demo's WERE CON'S FIRST AND FOREMOST
and at that time the LIBERAL'S WERE THE REPUBLICANS

perhaps why you say ''Both of your examples are Democrat dirty tricks from ages ago, as are your examples from earlier posts.''
not understanding the evil of the conned has NO one home IT SLITHERS AS IT MOVES

and rather then call the slave owners members of a party
why not ID them by their ideology that is the same as yours ''screw you I got my stuff and I will not care or share'' IE THE NUT CON'S

those slavers are your guys not the GOP of 1865
but sadly became the Gop of the raygun by 1985
understand where and how they really came from NOT THE MYTH

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

randye MAY 04, 07:11 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


Perhaps you should find another country to live in then, as the People have never elected the President directly by popular vote. Brush up (or maybe read for the first time) on the written arguments by the Founding Fathers concerning the establishment of the Electoral College and the safeguards it builds in to our process.

Jim Crow and the 3/5's?
Oh, I agree, but did you know that both those were due to the Democratic slave holders wanting to strip rights from the freed slaves (Jim Crow laws) and Democratic slave holders wanting to count slaves as whole persons in the population of their states (even though the slaves had no vote at the time) in order to get more seats in the House of Representatives. The 3/5ths Compromise prevented over representation by the South.

Both of your examples are Democrat dirty tricks from ages ago, as are your examples from earlier posts.

If you're gonna express your arguments, you should have some facts behind your arguments - not the disinformation you have been fed from where ever you get it from.

Have you ever taken a History class?




Now you did it.

We will get "treated" to another round of the old Leftist myth that "the parties switched sides".

--------


OOPS....too late.
I see Leftist Fairytale Story Hour already started.

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-04-2022).]

ray b MAY 04, 07:13 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

Have you ever taken a History class?



IN 1964 i SUPPORTED AuH2O

BY 66 I quit the Gop too many racists were joining

I lived thru it in real life in real time

why can't the modern con every remember who was a con back then
randye MAY 04, 07:20 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


IN 1964 i SUPPORTED AuH2O




PROVE IT
ray b MAY 04, 07:25 PM

quote
Originally posted by randye:


Now you did it.

We will get "treated" to another round of the old Leftist myth that "the parties switched sides".



I guess when the real history is that bad
you have to LIE
AS THE TRUTH SUCKS RANDYE
ray b MAY 04, 07:29 PM

quote
Originally posted by randye:


PROVE IT



DUMB
find someone I went to school with
or just understand most people do not have to lie all the time like your hero the rump does

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

randye MAY 04, 07:34 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


DUMB

find someone I went to school with




PROVE THAT YOU WENT TO SCHOOL

All we ever see from you are incomplete sentences and incoherent strings of words replete with misspelled words and made-up words.

There is never a concise point or conclusion in any of the weird "haiku" that you write.

What precious little we can make out of your posts is wildly twisted, and / or false history and bizarre rhetoric.

Based on all of that that I don't believe that you have any formal education past the very elementary level.

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-04-2022).]